题名

亞太菁英Fun Taipei-文化嚮導體驗營課程介紹與辦理反思

并列篇名

The Summer Camp- Elites from Asia Pacific Got Fun in Taipei: The Introduction of the Course and Feedbacks

作者

游健弘(Chien-Hong Yu)

关键词

夏令營 ; 資優生活動 ; 服務學習 ; Summer camp ; Activities for gifted students ; Service-learning

期刊名称

資優教育論壇

卷期/出版年月

14卷(2016 / 03 / 01)

页次

73 - 83

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

2015年暑假由臺灣師範大學承辦的國中資優生夏令營“亞太菁英fun台北”規劃了一場很特別的文化交流與服務學習課程。透過夏令營的課程,學員們學習擔任文化嚮導的角色去帶領參加第一屆亞太科學資優論壇的外國學生認識臺北這個美麗的城市。四天的課程包括了服務學習的認識、問題解決能力、實際執行能力及反思等豐富的內容。筆者有幸參與此次課程規劃與執行,透過自身的經驗與學生的回饋,提出了數點建議,包括了1.建立人力資料庫。2.增加資優生交流與觀摩的機會。3.加強資優生的情意教育與服務熱忱。4.建立方案特色。5.能繼續延伸課程。6.增加營隊的多元性與適性化。希望提供未來辦理相關營隊者參考。

英文摘要

In 2015, National Taiwan Normal University hosted "Elites from Asia Pacific Got Fun in Taipei" summer camp for junior high gifted students, a course including exceptional cultural exchange and service-learning. The camp allowed Taiwan gifted students to be the cultural guides to introduce Taipei City to the guest students who participated in The first Asia-Pacific Forum for Science Talented. The four-day course included getting to know service-learning, building up problem solving , executive, introspection skills. The editor participated in the course planning and implementing, and several suggestions are proposed based on his experience and students' feedback : 1. To build up human resource database 2. To create more opportunities for international gifted students to exchange information and emulate their counterparts. 3. To improve the affective education and service enthusiasm. 4. To build the program features. 5. Able to extend the curriculum. 6. To make the camps more diversified and adaptive These suggestions are for the reference of future summer camp course planners.

主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 任恩儀(2011)。以大學為基礎的周六資優教育充實方案:以普度大學資優中心為例。資優教育季刊,119,9-16。
    連結:
  2. Bangel, N. J.,Moon, S. M.,Capobianco, B. M.(2010).Preservice teachers' perceptions and experiences in a gifted education training model.Gifted Child Quarterly,54(0),209-221.
  3. Davis, G. A.,Rimm, S. B.,Siegle, D.(2010).Education of the gifted and talented.New York:Pearson.
  4. Hertzberg-Davis, H. L.(2009).Myth7: Differentiation in the regular classroom is equivalent to gifted programs and is sufficient, classroom teachers have the time, the skill, and the will to differentiate adequately.Gifted Child Quarterly,53(4),251-253.
  5. Steinmiller, G.,Steinmiller, R(2004).Gifted and talented summer program: You can design one easily.Rural Special Education Quarterly,23(1),96-98.
  6. 毛連塭(1995)。資優教育-課程與教學。臺北市:五南。
  7. 吳武典(1982)。聯考、夏令營與資優教育。資優教育季刊,7
  8. 教育部(2008)。資優教育白皮書。臺北:教育部。
  9. 郭靜姿編、王曼娜編(2011)。資優教育充實方案〜理論與案例分享。臺北市:教育部。
  10. 陳美芳、陳台瓊、蕭淑憶、李明香、蘇祐秋、仇惟善、張錦程、柯淑菁、鄭惠萍、陳宣延(1995)。北區中小學資優生假日充實方案評介。資優教育季刊,54(4-8),25。
  11. 臺北市教育局(2010)。臺北市資賦優異教育白皮書。臺北市:教育局。