跨界與高度洄游種群的保育與管理制度

The Conservation and Management Regime of Straddling and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks

黃異(I Hwang)；周怡良(Yi-Liang Chou)

跨界與高度洄游種群 ； 保育與管理 ； 合作 ； straddling and highly migratory fish stocks ； conservation and management ； cooperation

臺灣海洋法學報

23期（2015 / 12 / 01）

35 - 55

繁體中文

論文的目的在於闡明1995 年魚種群協定所建置的跨界與高度洄游種群保育與管理制度。1995 年魚種群協定仍然植基於傳統的漁業保育觀念，但卻融入生態系方法。1995 年魚種群協定所植基的原則之一是合作原則。公海捕撈國與相關沿海國應在跨界與高度洄游種群的保育與管理方面，直接或透過次區域或區域漁業管理組織或安排，進行合作。公海捕撈國應在保育與管理措施的實施與執法方面，進行合作。

The purpose of the article is to elaborate the conservation and management regime established by the 1995 Fish Stocks Agreement for straddling and highly migratory fish stocks. The 1995 Fish Stocks Agreement still bases on the traditional fisheries management concept but integrates ecosystem approach into it. One of the fundamental principles which underpin the 1995 Fish Stocks Agreement is principle of cooperation. High seas fishing states and relevant coastal states shall cooperate, either directly or through subregional or regional fisheries management organization or arrangement, in the conservation and management of straddling and highly migratory fish stocks. High seas fishing states are obliged to cooperate in compliance and enforcement of conservation and management measures.

1. Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries(1995).
2. United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea(1982).
3. Agreement for the Implementation of the Provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982 relating to the Conservation and Management of Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks(1995).
4. Agreement to Promote Compliance with International Conservation and Management Measures by Fishing Vessels on the High Seas(1993).
5. Bang, Ho-Sam,Jang, Duck-Jong(2012).Recent Developments in Regional Memorandums of Understanding on Port State Control.Ocean Development & International Law,43,170-187.
6. Caron, David D.(ed.),Scheiber, Harry N.(ed.)(2004).Bringing New Law to Ocean Waters.Leiden:
7. Ellis, Jaye(2001).The Straddling Stocks Agreement and the Precautionary Principles as Interpretive Device and Rule of Law.Ocean Development & International Law,32,289-311.
8. Henriksen, Tore(2009).Revisiting the Freedom of Fishing and Legal Obligations on States Not Party to Regional Fisheries Management Organizations.Ocean Development & International Law,40,80-96.
9. Hey, Ellen(1989).The Regime for the Exploitation of Transboundary Marine Fisheries Resources, The United Nations Law of the Sea Convention Cooperation between States.Dordrecht:
10. Hey, Ellen(ed.)(1999).Development in International Fisheries Law.The Hague:
11. Juda, Lawrence(1997).The 1995 United Nations Agreement on Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks: A Critique.Ocean Development & International Law,28,147-166.
12. Kasoulides, George C.(1993).Port State Control and Jurisdiction, Evolution of the Port State Regime.Dordrecht:
13. Molenaar, Erik Jaap(2007).Port State Jurisdiction: Toward Comprehensive, Mandatory and Global Coverage.Ocean Development & International Law,38,225-257.
14. Pereira Pinto, Daniela Diz(2013).Fisheries Management in Areas beyond National Jurisdiction, The Impact of Ecosystem Based Law-Making.Leiden:
15. Sage, Bénédicte(2006).Precautionary Coastal States' Jurisdiction.Ocean Development & International Law,37,359-360.
16. Tahindro, André(1997).Conservation and Management of Transboundary Fish Stocks : Comments in Light of the Adoption of the 1995 Agreement of Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks.Ocean Development & International Law,28,1-58.
17. Vicuña, Francisco Orrego(1999).The Changing International Law of High Sea Fisheries.Cambridge:
18. Vidas, Davor(ed.),Ostreng, Willy(ed.)(1999).Order for the Oceans at the Turn of the Century.The Hague:
19. Yturriaga, José A.(1997).The International Regime of Fisheries, From UNCLOS 1982 to the Presential Sea.The Hague:
20. 黃異(2010)。國際法。臺北: