题名

經理人薪酬與認股權是否影響公司股利政策?

并列篇名

Is Corporate Dividend Policy Associated with Executive Compensation and Employee Stock Option?

作者

張元(Yuan Chang);方馥恩(Fu-En Fang)

关键词

Executive Compensation ; Employee Stock Option ; Dividend Policy

期刊名称

兩岸金融季刊

卷期/出版年月

4卷3期(2016 / 09 / 01)

页次

51 - 89

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

公司的股利政策一直是公司財務與公司治理中的重要議題。股利發放的多寡牽涉到公司如何回應股東投資其資金應拿回的報酬與未來投資所需資金的權衡,股利發放與其穩定性也是公司治理機制中的一項重要指標,因為股利降低了管理階層挪用公司資源所可能產生的代理成本。公司通常透過提高經理人的薪酬或誘因報酬機制(如認股權)增進其為公司努力的動機,如果經理人薪酬與認股權足以增進公司的經營成果,則公司的股利高低將與經理人薪酬與認股權之多寡呈正相關;另一方面,認股權占總薪酬比例的增加促使管理階層形成降低股利並投資未來的政策,從而在認股權的執行上產生更大獲利的機會,如此一來將有可能降低公司的股利發放而增進公司投資。本文根據2008-2013 年間台灣上市、櫃公司的資料,以現金股利、股利(現金股利+股票股利)、現金股利發放率、股利(現金股利+股票股利)發放率、股利(現金股利+股票股利)的標準差,做為公司股利政策的代理變數,檢驗這些變數是否受經理人薪酬與認股權占薪資之比例所影響。主要實證結果發現,公司管理階層的平均薪酬愈高,股利發放水準與股利的發放率有愈高的傾向,但股利發放穩定性則傾向愈低;當認股權占薪酬的比率愈高時,股利發放的水準與發放率傾向愈低,但不會顯著影響股利發放的穩定性。本文考慮以Heckman (1979)之兩階段估計以降低公司發放認股權之樣本選擇偏誤,並採取落遲自變數以降低同期相關謬誤,主要實證結果並未有明顯的改變。

英文摘要

Dividends policy has been long-standing important financial decision. The amount of dividends paid and its stability are also important indicators of corporate governance mechanism. While executive in company often pursuit his/her own interests but the interests of shareholder/stakeholder as their main goal, increasing executive compensation enhancing incentive as well as reducing agency problem to improve the firm performance. Based on annual data of listed company on Taiwan Stock Exchange/GTSM through 2008-2013, this paper examines the linkage between the level of executive compensation/the amount of employee stock option to total compensation and corporate dividend policy. Company's dividend policy is proxied by cash dividends, dividends (cash dividend plus stock dividend), cash dividend payout ratio, dividend payout ratio and dividend payout variability. Greater level of compensation tends to increase firm's performance and thus dividends, but greater level of employee stock option to total compensation may encourage the management to retained firm's earnings to exploit future profitability. The latter decreases the motivation of dividend payout. Empirical result shows the higher the corporate executive average compensation, the higher the company's dividend level and dividend radio but the lower the degree of variation dividend. The higher the ratio of employee stock option to total compensation, the lower the company's dividend ratio level and payout ratio, but does not significantly affect the degree of variability of dividends. Two-step estimation to reduce sample selection bias and using lagged independent variable to reduce contemporaneous correlation did not change the result significantly.

主题分类 社會科學 > 經濟學
参考文献
  1. 李馨蘋、鄭誌偉(2008)。從管理者薪酬與機構法人持股之觀點看企業創新投資之影響因素。東吳經濟商學學報,62,47-68。
    連結:
  2. 林穎芬、黃麗津、陳思源(2012)。經理人薪酬、公司治理與現金股利政策。中山管理評論,20(4),1213-1251。
    連結:
  3. 張瑞當、林國欽、沈文華、侯佩秀(2007)。高階經理人薪酬績效敏感度對自願性資訊發佈之影響。會計與公司治理,4(1),57-84。
    連結:
  4. Ganor, M. (2011), “Agency Costs in the Era of Economic Crisis –The Enhanced Connection between CEO Compensation and Corporate Cash Holdings,” Working paper.
  5. Berger, P. G.,Ofek, E.,Yermack, D. L.(1997).Managerial Entrenchment and Capital Structure Decisions.Journal of Finance,52,1411-1438.
  6. Bettis, R. A.(1981).Performance Differences in Related and Unrelated Diversified Firms.Strategic Management Journal,2,379-394.
  7. Bhattacharya, S.(1979).Imperfect Information, Dividend Policy, and the Bird-in-the-hand Fallacy.Bell Journal of Economics,10,259-270.
  8. Bhattacharyya, N.,Mawani, A.,Morrill, C.(2008).Dividend Payout and Executive Compensation: Theory and Evidence.Accounting and Finance,3,189-220.
  9. Black, F,Scholes, M.(1973).The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities.The Journal of Political Economy,6,37-59.
  10. Carpenter, M. A.,Sanders, W. G.(2004).The Effects of Top Management Team Pay and Firm Internationalization on MNC Performance.Journal of Management,30,509-528.
  11. Carpenter, M. A.,Sanders, W. G.(2002).Top Management Team Compensation: the Missing Link between CEO Pay and Firm Performance?.Strategic Management Journal,23,367-375.
  12. Chatterjee, S.,Wernerfelt, B.(1991).The Link between Resources and Type of Diversification: Theory and Evidence.Strategic Management Journal,12,33-48.
  13. Core, J. E.,Guay, W. R.(2001).Stock Option Plans for Non-Executive Employees.Journal of Financial Economics,61,253-287.
  14. Core, J. E.,Holthausen, R. W.,Larcker, D. F.(1999).Corporate Governance, Chief Executive Officer Compensation, and Firm Performance.Journal of Financial Economics,51,371-406.
  15. Defusco, R.,Zorn, T.,Johnson, R.(1991).The Association between Executive Stock Option Plan Changes and Managerial Decision Making.Financial Management,20,36-43.
  16. Demsetz, H.,Lehn, K.(1985).The Structure of Corporate Ownership: Causes and Consequences.Journal of Political Economy,93,1155-1177.
  17. Ducy, M.,Iqbal, Z.,Akhigbe, A.(1997).Employee Stock Ownership Plans and Cash Flow Performance of Publicly Traded Firms.American Business Review,15,31-36.
  18. Fama, E. F.(1980).Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm.Journal of Political Economy,88,288-307.
  19. Fama, E. F.,French, K. R.(2001).Disappearing Dividends: Changing Firm Characteristics or Lower Propensity to Pay?.Journal of Financial Economics,60,3-43.
  20. Fenn, G. W.,Liang, N.(2001).Corporate Payout Policy and Managerial Stock Incentives.Journal of Financial Economics,60,45-72.
  21. Finkelstein, S.,Boyd, B. K.(1998).How Much Does the CEO Matter? The Role of Managerial Discretion in the Setting of CEO Compensation.Academy of Management Journal,41,179-199.
  22. Gordon, M. J.(1963).Optimal Investment and Financing Policy.Journal of Finance,18,264-272.
  23. Hall, B.,Liebman, J.(1998).Are CEOs Paid like Bureaucrats?.Quarterly Journal of Economics,103,653-691.
  24. Hoskisson, R. E.,Hitt, M. A.,Hill, C. W. L.(1993).Managerial Incentive and Investment in R&D in Large Multiproduct Firms.Organization Science,4,325-41.
  25. Ittner, C. D.,Lambert, R. A.,Larcker, D. F.(2003).The Structure and Performance Consequences of Equity Grants to Employees of New Economy Firms.Journal of Accounting and Economics,34,89-127.
  26. Jensen, M.,Meckling, W.(1976).Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.Journal of Financial Economics,3,305-360.
  27. Kato, T.,Kubo, K.(2006).CEO Compensation and Firm Performance in Japan: Evidence from New Panel Data on Individual CEO Pay.Journal of the Japanese and International Economies,20,1-19.
  28. Lee, T. S.,Shu, P. G.,Su, Y. H.,Yeh, Y. H.(2009).Non-Tradable Share Reform and Corporate Governance in the Chinese Stock Market.Corporate Governance: An International Review,17,457-475.
  29. Lewellen, W. G.,Loderer, C.,Martin, K.(1987).Executive Compensation and Executive Incentive Problems: An Empirical Analysis.Journal of Accounting and Economics,9,287-310.
  30. Lintner, J.(1962).Dividends, Earnings, Leverage, Stock Prices and Supply of Capital to Corporations.The Review of Economics and Statistics,64,243-269.
  31. Miller, M. H.,Modigliani, F.(1961).Dividend Policy, Growth and the Valuation of Shares.Journal of Business,34,411-433.
  32. Miller, M. H.,Rock, K.(1985).Dividend Policy under Asymmetric Information.The Journal of Finance,40,1031-1051.
  33. Minnick, K. L.,Rosenthal, L.(2014).Stealth Compensation: Do CEOs Increase Their Pay by Influencing Dividend Policy?.Journal of Corporate Finance,25,435-454.
  34. Mitton, T.(2004).Corporate Governance and Dividend Policy in Emerging Markets.Emerging Markets Review,5,409-426.
  35. Myers, S. C.(1997).Determinants of Corporate Borrowing.Journal of Financial Economics,5,147-175.
  36. Ofer, A. R.,Siegel, D. R.(1987).Corporate Financial Policy, Information, and Market Expectations: An Empirical Investigation of Dividends.Journal of Finance,42,889-911.
  37. Pound, J.(1988).Proxy Contests and The Efficiency of Shareholder Oversight.Journal of Financial Economics,20,237-265.
  38. Pozen, R. C.(1994).Institutional Investors: The Reluctant Activists.Harvard Business Review,72,140-149.
  39. Prevost, A. K.,Rao, R. P.(2002).Determinants of Board Composition in New Zealand: a Simultaneous Equations Approach.Journal of Empirical Finance,9,373-397.
  40. Rajgopal, S.,Shevlin, T.(2003).Empirical Evidence on the Relation Between Stock Option Compensation and Risk Taking.Journal of Accounting and Economics,34,145-171.
  41. Robbins, S. P.(1978).The Management of HR Resource.Englewood Cliffs. N.J:Prentice-Hall.
  42. Ryan, H. E., Jr.,Wiggins, R. A., III(2002).The Interactions between R&D: Investment Decisionsand Compensation Policy.Financial Management,31,5-29.
  43. Smith, C. W.,Watts, R. L.(1992).The Investment Opportunity Set and Corporate Financing, Dividend and Compensation Policies.Journal of Financial Economics,32,263-292.
  44. Van, B.,Levrau, A.(2002).The Role of the Venture Capitalist as Monitor of the Company: A Corporate Governance Perspective.Corporate Governance: An International Review,10,124-135.
  45. Weisbach, M. S.(1988).Outside Directors and CEO Turnover.Journal of Financial Economics,20,431-461.
  46. White, L. F.(1996).Executive Compensation and Dividend Policy.Journal of Corporate Finance,2,335-358.
  47. Yermack, D.(1996).Higher Market Valuation of Companies with a Small Board of Directors.Journal of Financial Economics,40,185-211.
  48. Yermack, D.(1995).Do Corporations Award CEO Stock Options Effectively?.Journal of Financial Economic,39,237-269.
  49. 朱芳慧(2014)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立成功大學財務金融研究所碩士在職專班。
  50. 林東寬(2009)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。實踐大學財務金融與保險研究所。
  51. 林斐嬋(2009)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立政治大學會計研究所。
  52. 祝懿箴(2009)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立中正大學會計與資訊研究所。
  53. 張元、沈中華、李卿企(2011)。員工認股選擇權與公司績效—反事實分析架構之應用。經濟論文叢刊,39(3),325-372。
  54. 張簡富桂(2009)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。朝陽科技大學財務金融系碩士班。
  55. 莊予珊(2014)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。大葉大學企業管理學系碩士班。
  56. 溫育芳、楊鈞棠(2012)。公司治理與舉債融資在降低代理問題替代性之探討。臺灣銀行季刊,63(2)
  57. 劉綠萍(2003)。博士論文(博士論文)。國立臺北大學企業管理學系博士班。
被引用次数
  1. 官晁安(2017)。公司特性與現金股利發放之關聯性。義守大學財務金融學系學位論文。2017。1-77。
  2. 鄭秝穎(2017)。股權結構、資本結構、股利政策與台灣網絡通訊公司績效之研究。臺中科技大學財務金融研究所碩士班學位論文。2017。1-58。