Management of Employee Stock Option Pricing Model Input Assumptions

員工認股選擇權訂價模型參數假設之管理

10.6538/TAR.2012.0801.01

郭啟賢(Chii-Shyan Kuo)；黎明淵(Leon Ming-Yuan Li)

員工認股選擇權 ； 選擇權訂價模型參數假設 ； 盈餘管理 ； Employee stock option ； Earnings management ； Option-pricing model input

中華會計學刊

8卷1期（2012 / 01 / 01）

1 - 27

英文;繁體中文

本文探討台灣高科技公司是否藉由管理選擇權訂價模型參數假設來低估員工認股選擇權價值。我們選取台灣310家高科技公司為樣本，期間涵蓋2004至2009。我們估算員工認股選擇權每權價值低估約新台幣1.2元。另外，低估現象主要是發生在早期。隨後，該價值低估程度呈逐年遞減趨勢。此外，選擇權價值低估主要是預期股價波動率低估所致。再者，證據顯示股價波動率低估的現象是系統性低估而非隨機造成。同時我們也發現選擇權存續年限亦有低估的情形，但其低估對選擇權每權價值的影響數不具經濟意義。我們總結如下，在2008年之前，認股權發行公司確有投機性低估員工認股權價值的現象。但是，或因新經驗的累積，或因第39號公報自2008年起生效，因而所揭露的參數假設將受更嚴格外部審計查核之故，公司在後期較能審慎地估計選擇權模型參數，因而所估計的認股權價值較過去精確。

This study examines whether managers in Taiwan are motivated to systematically understate their employee stock option (ESO) values by managing the option-pricing model input assumptions. Using 310 high-tech firms in Taiwan from 2004-2009, we find that the dollar amount of the discretionary ESO value per option, i.e., the difference between per option value using reported inputs and that using historical inputs, is NT $-1.20. Further, we find that the magnitude of the discretionary ESO value per option is more salient for the period prior to 2008 and exhibits a decreasing trend over time. Additionally, we find the understated ESO value is mainly caused by the stock return volatility, which apparently is determined in an opportunistic manner. We also find that firms tend to report a lower than expected option life; however, the corresponding economic implication is negligible. Taken together, we conclude that the economic consequence of the management of inputs mainly happened in the early stage of the sample period. Managers subsequently become more sophisticated and cautious, probably because firms gain more experience from the past or because disclosed inputs become subject to more rigorous scrutiny by external auditors due to the mandated recognition of ESO expenses starting from 2008.

1. Balsam, S., E. Bartov, and J. Yin. (2006) Disclosure versus recognition of option expense: An empirical investigation of SFAS No. 148 and stock returns. Working Paper. Temple University, New York University and University of Texas at San Antonio.
2. Li, H. (2002) Employee stock options, residual income valuation and stock price reaction to SFAS 123 footnote disclosures. Working paper. The University of Iowa.
3. Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 39. Accounting for stock-based compensation. Financial Accounting Standard Board (FASB) of Taiwan..
4. Bartov, E., P. S. Mohanram, and D. Nissim. (2004) Stock option expense, forward-looking information, and implied volatilities of trade options. Working paper. New York University.
5. Aboody, D.(1996).Market valuation of employee stock options.Journal of Accounting and Economics,22,357-391.
6. Aboody, D.,Barth, M. E.,Kasznik, R.(2004).SFAS No.123 stock-based compensation expenses and equity market values.The Accounting Review,79(2),251-275.
7. Aboody, D.,Barth, M. E.,Kasznik, R.(2006).Do firms understate stock-based compensation expense disclosed under SFAS 123?.Review of Accounting Studies,11(4),429-461.
8. Balsam, S.,Mozes, H. A.,Newman, H. A.(2003).Managing pro forma stock option expense under SFAS No. 123.Accounting Horizons,17(1),31-45.
9. Bell, T. B.,Landsman, W. R.,Miller, B. L.,Yeh, S.(2002).The valuation implication of employee stock option accounting for profitable computer software firms.The Accounting Review,77(4),971-996.
10. Burgstahler, D.,Dichev, I.(1997).Earnings management to avoid earnings decreases and losses.Journal of Accounting and Economics,24(1),99-126.
11. Burgstahler, D.,Eames, M.(2006).Management of earnings and analysts' forecasts to achieve zero and small positive earnings surprises.Journal of Business Finance & Accounting,33(5-6),633.
12. Canina, L.,Figlewski, S.(1993).The information content of implied volatility.The Review of Financial Studies,6(3),659-681.
13. Chatterjee, S.,Hadi, A. S.,Price, B.(2000).Regression Analysis by Example.New York:John Wiley & Sons.
14. Dye, R.(1988).Earnings management in an overlapping generations model.Journal of Accounting Research,195-235.
15. Hodder, L.,Mayew, W.,McAnally, M.L.,Weaver, C. D.(2006).Employee stock option fair-value estimates: do managerial discretion and incentives explain accuracy?.Contemporary Accounting Research,23(4),933-975.
16. Johnston, D.(2006).Managing stock option expense: The manipulation of option-pricing model assumptions.Contemporary Accounting Research,23(2),395-425.
17. Kuo, C.,Yu, S.(2012).Market valuation of employee stock option expenses- evidence from Taiwan.Review of Securities and Futures Markets,24(4)
18. Maddala, G.S.,Lahiri, K.(2009).Introduction to Econometrics.The John Wiley and Sons, Ltd..
19. Teoh, S. H.,Welch, I.,Wong, T. J.(1998).Earnings management and the post-issue performance of seasoned equity offerings.Journal of Financial Economics,50,63-99.
20. Teoh, S. H.,Welch, I.,Wong, T. J.(1998).Earnings management and the long-term market performance of initial public offerings.Journal of Finance,53,1935-1974.
21. Trueman, B.,Titman, S.(1988).An explanation for accounting income smoothing.Journal of Accounting Research,26(Supplement),127-39.
22. Yermack, D.(1998).Companies' modest claims about the value of CEO stock options awards.Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting,10,207-226.

1. 陳昭蓉、許崇源、何里仁(2017)。董事會在新會計準則過渡期間所扮演之角色：以發行員工認股權為例。中山管理評論，25(4)，875-933。