题名

屏東演藝廳服務品質屬性之研究-以Kano二維品質模式之應用

并列篇名

RESEARCH ON THE SERVICE QUALITY ATTRIBUTE OF PINGTUNG PERFORMING ARTS CENTER--APPLICATION OF KANO TWO-DIMENSIONAL QUALITY MODEL

DOI

10.6338/JDA.202008_15(4).0003

作者

許昌賢(Chang-Hsien Hsu);藍佑亘(Yu-Hsuan Lan)

关键词

屏東演藝廳 ; Kano二維品質模式 ; 服務品質 ; 藝術管理 ; Pingtung Performing Arts Hall ; Kano two-dimensional quality model ; service quality ; art management

期刊名称

Journal of Data Analysis

卷期/出版年月

15卷4期(2020 / 08 / 01)

页次

49 - 68

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

屏東演藝廳在2016年興建完成,其外觀設計上以兩架鋼琴對彈的樣貌作為場館呈現,結合建築體外框架的連接,更在兩棟主體建築物中間圍繞成「埕」。而除了外部建築,屏東演藝廳的展演廳更擁有全國第二座的巨大管風琴,而除了管風琴本身主體琴座與2793支音管管件等主要結構,更擁有全球獨一無二的兩支特殊音栓,並取名為「Flute Formosa」,亦為「福爾摩沙台灣笛管」,此笛管同時也是全球第一次將36支竹子以及25支錫合金音管進行搭配的創舉。然而,該類型演藝廳在經營上,除了上述在各個硬體設備需要具備一定水平外,再者,就是在軟體上也同樣需要達到相對水準,而這部分則是以館方人員之服務品質好壞佔很大的影響程度。如何透過服務品質的提升或精進吸引更多觀眾群前來觀賞演出,並藉此進一步培養固定客群,對於已經是「藝文沙漠」的屏東來說就更顯重要與立即性。綜觀上述,因此筆者便根據曾前往演藝廳欣賞演出之觀眾進行相關問卷訪談,且應用Kano二維品質模式來探討屏東演藝廳之服務品質屬性,藉由問卷調查了解觀眾群對於屏東演藝廳在各項服務要素的重視度為何。而根據統計結果發現,屏東演藝廳在服務品質要素裡,有一維品質要素15項、魅力品質要素6項、無差異品質要素5項、當然品質要素3項。

英文摘要

The Pingtung Performing Arts Center was built in 2016. The design is presented as a venue with two piano-like bullets, it naturally produces light and shadow effects, and is surrounded by two main buildings with a share like a Chinese word "埕". In addition to the exterior buildings, the exhibition hall of the Pingtung Performing Arts Center has the second largest organ in the country. In addition to the main structure of the main organ of the organ itself and 2793 sound tube fittings, it also has two unique special plugs in the world. It is also called "Flute Formosa", also known as "Formosa Taiwan Flute". This flute is also the first amazement in the world to match 36 bamboos and 25 tin alloy sound tubes. However, in this type of performance center, in addition to the above, it needs to have a certain level in each hardware device. Furthermore, it is also required to reach the relative level in software, and is based on the service quality of the library personnel. Looking at the above, the author conducted interviews with the audience based on the audience who had visited the performance center, and applied the Kano two-dimensional quality model to explore the service quality attributes of the Pingtung Performing Arts Center. The questionnaire survey was conducted to understand the audience for the Pingtung Performing Arts Center. What is the importance attached to each service element? According to the statistical results, the Pingtung Performing Arts Center has 15 quality attributes, 6 attractive quality elements, 5 non-differential quality elements, and 3 quality elements.

主题分类 基礎與應用科學 > 資訊科學
基礎與應用科學 > 統計
社會科學 > 管理學
参考文献
  1. 廖淑容,周志龍,古宜靈(2000)。文化產業生根與地方發展。都市與計畫,27(3),117-139。
    連結:
  2. 蔡怡怡,黃靖惠(2013)。類博物館的地方文化館參與節慶與地方意識之連結。博物館學季刊,27(1),05-32。
    連結:
  3. 謝宏仁(2015)。非都會區表演藝術設施觀眾特性及願付價格之案例研究—以宜蘭演藝廳為例。建築學報,91,179-195。
    連結:
  4. (2012).2011表演藝術年鑑.台北市:國立中正文化中心.
  5. Bateson, H.G.(2002).Essential of Service Marketing: Concepts,Strategy,and Cases.Orlando:Harcourt.
  6. Carman, J. M.(1990).Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality: An Assessment of the SERVQUAL Dimensions.Journal of Retailing,66(1),33-55.
  7. Churchill,Surprenant, C.(1982).An Investigation Into the Deierminants of Customer Satisfaction.Journal of Marketing Research,19,491-504.
  8. CQM(1993).Special issues on kano’s Methods for understanding customer-defined quality.Center for Quality Management Journal,2,3-35.
  9. Crosby, P.B.(1979).Quality is Free.New York:McGraw-Hill Book Co..
  10. Etzel, M. J.,Walker, B. J.,Stanton, W. J.(2001).Marketing of Management.New York:McGraw-Hill.
  11. Herzberg, F.(1959).The Motivation to Work.NY:John Wiley and Sons.
  12. Kano, N.,Seraku, N.,Takahashi, F.,Tsuji, S.(1984).Attractive quality and must-be quality.Hinshitsu, Quality, the Journal of Japanese Society for Quality Control,14,39-48.
  13. Kuo, Y.F.,Wub, C.M.,Deng, W.J.(2012).IPA-Kano model:A new tool for categorising and diagnosing service quality attributes.Total Quality Management & Business Excellence,23(7-8),731-748.
  14. Kuo, Y.F.,Wub, C.M.,Deng, W.J.(2009).The Relationships among Service Quality, Perceived Value, Customer Satisfaction, and Post-purchase Intention in Mobile Value-added Services.Computers in Human Behavior,25(4),887-896.
  15. Matzler, K.,Hinterhuber H. H.(2004).Employee Satisfaction: Does Kano's Model Apply?.Total Quality Management and Business Excellence,15(9/10),1179-1198.
  16. Matzler, K.,Hinterhuber, H.H.(1998).How to make product development projects more successful by integrating kano’s model of customer satisfaction into quality function deployment.Technovation,18(1),25-38.
  17. Parasuraman, A.,Zeithaml, V. A.,Berry, L.L.(1985).A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research.Journal of Marketing,49,41-50.
  18. Parasuraman, A.,Zeithaml, V.A.,Berry, L.L.(1991).Refinement and reassessment of the SERVQUAL scale.Journal of Retailing,67,420-450.
  19. Presbury, R.,Fitzgerald, A.,Chapman, R.(2005).Impediments to improvements in service quality in luxury hotels.Managing Service Quality,15(4),357-373.
  20. Solomon, M. R.,Marshall, G. W.,Stuart, E.W.(2005).Marketing Real People, Real Choices.NJ Upper Saddle River:Prentice Hall.
  21. Tan, K. C.,Pawitra, T. A.(2001).Integrating SERVQUAL and Kano’s Model into QFD for Service Excellence Development.Managing Service Quality,11(6),418-430.
  22. Yang, C. C.(2003).Establishment and Applications of the Integrated Model of Service Quality Measurement.Managing Service Quality,13(4),310-324.
  23. 大元建築事務所(2014)。屏東演藝廳音樂、光影與建築。文化生活,78,13-17。
  24. 多聯活動策展(股)公司(2014)。屏東演藝廳開幕創意數位多人互動遊戲—當「音樂」遇上「遊戲APP」。文化生活,78,36-40。
  25. 李虹叡(2014)。樂器之王,屏東演藝廳亮麗登場。文化生活,78,07-12。
  26. 郭漢辰(2014)。向世界舞台奔躍—專訪曹縣長,屏東演藝廳元年展新姿。文化生活,78,02-06。
  27. 陳茂康(2016)。以「埕」的概念出發開啟藝術的想像。RAR表演藝術雜誌,287,108-109。
  28. 劉信宏(2014)。聽見屏東在歌唱—德國Schuke管風琴在屏東演藝廳。文化生活,78,24-30。
  29. 謝玉玲,謝宏仁,賴榮平(2015)。台灣地區文化表演設施服務圈域之研究。國立宜蘭大學工程學刊,11,111-128。
  30. 謝育穎(2014)。琴聲藝動—談屏東縣演藝廳聲學設計。文化生活,78,18-23。
  31. 藍佑亘,陳孟辰(2018)。藝文產業的發展與管理-探討屏東演藝廳營運層面與功能性之策略運用。永續發展與產業管理學術研討會論文集,台南: