题名

財政與金融支農縮小了城鄉收入差距嗎?-基於協同效應與仲介效應的研究

并列篇名

DID FISCAL AND FINANCIAL SUPPORTS FOR AGRICULTURE NARROW DOWN URBAN-RURAL INCOME GAP?-A RESEARCH BASED ON SYNERGETIC EFFECT AND MEDIATING EFFECT

DOI

10.6338/JDA.202206_17(2).0003

作者

聂丽(Nie Li);石凯(Shi Kai);庞博(Pang Bo)

关键词

新型城鎮化 ; 財政支農 ; 金融支農 ; 城鄉收入差距 ; New Urbanization ; Fiscal Support for Agriculture ; Financial Support for Agriculture ; Urban-rural Income Gap

期刊名称

Journal of Data Analysis

卷期/出版年月

17卷2期(2022 / 06 / 01)

页次

59 - 76

内容语文

簡體中文

中文摘要

本文運用空間面板模型實證檢驗了財政支農、金融支農對城鄉收入差距的直接影響、協同效應與時空差异,揭示了新型城鎮化的仲介效應。研究發現:(1)城鎮化可顯著縮小城鄉收入差距;(2)提高金融支農效率可顯著縮小城鄉收入差距,但財政支農(無論效率、規模還是結構)卻在一定程度上擴大了城鄉收入差距;(3)財政、金融支農規模在2014年前後對縮小城鄉收入差距的協同效應均顯著為正,且可以借助城鎮化的仲介作用縮小城鄉收入差距;(4)從政策效果的時空差异看,無論是單個變數的縮小或擴大效應,還是變數間的協同效應、仲介效應均在2014年後變强;(5)東部地區財政金融支農對縮小城鄉收入差距的影響强於中、西部地區,而城鎮化的縮小效應在西部地區更顯著。囙此,應進一步發揮新型城鎮化的主導作用,注重財政金融政策的協調配合,提高城鎮化的仲介作用。

英文摘要

We build the spatial panel model to test the direct impacts and synergetic effects of new urbanization as well as fiscal and financial supports for agriculture on the urban-rural income gap, as well as their spatial and temporal difference, and reveal the mediating effect of urbanization. The empirical findings are interesting. (1) Urbanization is the important factor of narrowing down income gap. (2) In total sample analysis, enhancing the efficiency of financial support for agriculture is able to effectively narrow the income gap while fiscal support policies enlarge the income gap to some extent. (3) In subsample analysis, increasing the size of fiscal and financial supports could not only generate significantly positive synergetic effect on narrowing down income gap either before 2014 or after, but also work through the mediating effect of urbanization. (4) In terms of the spatial and temporal difference of policy effects, all effects no matter direct impacts, synergetic effect or mediating effect, have became stronger since 2014. (5) The effect of fiscal and financial support in the east is larger than that in the middle and west, while urbanization in the west reveals more powerful impact. Thus, in order to narrow down the income gap, new urbanization should play an important leading role. Meanwhile, fiscal and financial policies should be coordinated with each other and the mediating effect of urbanization should be paid more attention to. Furthermore, the structure of financial support should be optimized and the public service system in rural area should be improved.

主题分类 基礎與應用科學 > 資訊科學
基礎與應用科學 > 統計
社會科學 > 管理學
参考文献
  1. Baron, R.M.,Kenny, D. A.(1987).The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,51(6),1173-1182.
  2. Kapoor, M.,Kelejian, H. H.,Prucha, I.R.(2007).Panel Data Models with Spatially Correlated Error Components.Journal of Econometrics,140(1),97-130.
  3. Lipton, M.(2008).Why Poor People Stay Poor; a Study of Urban Bias in World Development.Modern Asian Studies,13(1),167-173.
  4. Liu, S.,Wang, J.,Zeng, Y.(2015).Existing Problems in Financial Support for New Urbanization and Recommendations.Asian Agricultural Research,7(10),5-7.
  5. Millo, G.(2017).A Simple Randomization Test for Spatial Correlation in the Presence of Common Factors and Serial Correlation.Regional science and urban economics,66,28-38.
  6. Park, D.,Shin, K.(2017).Economic Growth, Financial Development and Income Inequality.Emerging Markets Finance and Trade,53(1),2794-2825.
  7. Sehrawat, M.,Giri, A. K.(2016).Panel Data Analysis of Financial Development, Economic Growth and Rural-urban Income Inequality: Evidence from SAARC Countries.International Journal of Social Economics,43(10),998-1015.
  8. Wu, D.,Rao, P.(2016).Urbanization and Income Inequality in China: An Empirical Investigation at Provincial Level.Social Indicators Research,131(1),1-26.
  9. 丁志国,张洋,高启然(2014)。基于区域经济差异的影响农村经济发展的农村金融因素识别。中国农村经济,2014(3),4-13。
  10. 王征,鲁钊阳(2011)。农村金融发展与城乡收入差距——基于我国省级动态面板数据模型的实证研究。财贸经济,2011(7),55-62。
  11. 余菊,刘新(2014)。城市化、社会保障支出与城乡收入差距——来自中国省级面板数据的经验证据。经济地理,34(3),79-84。
  12. 李燕凌,欧阳万福(2011)。县乡政府财政支农支出效率的实证分析。经济研究,2011(10),111-123+150。
  13. 李晓龙,冉光和(2019)。农村产业融合发展如何影响城乡收入差距——基于农村经济增长与城镇化的双重视角。农业技术经济,2019(8),17-28。
  14. 肖育才,姜晓萍(2017)。财政支农支出对城乡收入差距影响的实证研究。经济问题探索,2017(11),39-49。
  15. 徐斌,陈建宝(2015)。财政支农支出、经济增长、收入差距与区域农村居民消费——基于非参数可加模型的实证研究。数理统计与管理,2015(5),13-27。
  16. 莫亚琳,张志超(2011)。城市化进程、公共财政支出与社会收入分配——基于城乡二元结构模型与面板数据计量的分析。数量经济技术经济研究,2011(3),80-90。
  17. 葛蕾,陶小马,汪宏(2015)。地方财政金融、城市化与城乡收入差距实证。中国人口·资源与环境,25(9),93-99。
  18. 刘贯春(2017)。金融结构影响城乡收入差距的传导机制——基于经济增长和城市化双重视角的研究。财贸经济,38(6),98-114。
  19. 刘赛红,朱建(2017)。金融发展、城镇化与城乡居民收入差距关系实证。经济地理,37(8),46-52。
  20. 张宏彦,何清,余谦(2013)。中国农村金融发展对城乡收入差距影响的实证研究。中南财经政法大学学报,2013(1),83-88。
  21. 杨森平,唐芬芬,吴栩(2015)。我国城乡收入差距与城镇化率的倒U关系研究。管理评论,27(11),3-10。
  22. 邓金钱,何爱平(2016)。城镇化、地方财政支出规模与城乡收入差距——基于面板门槛模型的实证检验。管理学刊,29(2),35-42。