中學數學實習教師之學生參與概念心像探究

Concept Images for Mathematics Teaching of Mathematics Intern Teachers: The Aspect of Student Engagement

10.6278/tjme.20140904.001

謝佳叡(Chia-Jui Hsieh)

學生參與 ； 數學教學概念心像 ； 數學實習教師 ； student engagement ； concept image for mathematics teaching ； mathematics intern teacher

臺灣數學教育期刊

1卷2期（2014 / 10 / 01）

1 - 24

繁體中文

本研究試圖從數學教學概念心像的角度，探討中學數學實習教師在面對數學教學問題時，所展現出的教學決策與其背後認知結構。在各個不同的教學面向中，本文從學生參與面向出發，檢視中學數學實習教師在面對教學問題時所喚起之數學教學概念心像，以及其與教學決策之間的關聯。研究資料收集主要採用問卷調查方式，研究樣本則採方便取樣對2009年1月之臺師大數學實習教師進行普測，共計回收有效問卷62份。資料分析方式主要採取內容分析、歸納分析等方法。研究的主要發現包含：一、臺灣中學數學實習教師在學生參與面向概念心像的自發展現中，主要呈現讓學生專注課堂、讓學生自主學習，以及教學生活化等三種類型。二、對於學生參與的程度與方式，實習教師首重於學生的情感參與，在作法上則多偏向將課程與生活做連結。三、在含教學情境問題方面，半數以上的實習教師在新概念引入教學上展現出學生參與的心像，其中又以情感參與為主；而在學生不專心上課的處理上，大多數的實習教師則與行為參與產生聯繫，其次才是情感參與，此現象也反映出不同的教學情境將喚起實習教師不同的學生參與心像。研究也發現多數展現學生參與心像的實習教師也經常伴隨著其他面向的概念心像，尤其在學生情意面向心像與教學方法面向。

While observing teachers working, we found that they must make numerous decisions in managing the teaching situations that can occur within only a few moments. Based on the concept image for mathematics teaching (CIMT), this study investigated the bases on which secondary school intern teachers of mathematics in Taiwan choose certain strategies when engaging in teaching tasks, and examined the cognitive structure of the responses. This paper addresses student engagement in the mathematics classroom and the type of CIMT that is evoked when mathematics intern teachers engage in tasks related to mathematics instruction. We found that (a) through various teaching concepts, most intern teachers seldom spontaneously evoke the concept images of student engagement; (b) most intern teachers lay particular stress on students' emotional engagement and their connection between the curriculum and real-life experience; and (c) in practical teaching situations, intern teachers emphasize emotional engagement when introducing a new concept, but emphasize behavioral engagement when students do not concentrate in class. This study also established that most intern teachers who evoke the image of student engagement generally evoke the image of student affection and the image of teaching methods at the same time.

1. Appleton, J. J.,Christenson, S. L.,Furlong, M. J.(2008).Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct.Psychology in the Schools,45(5),369-386.
2. Atkinson, J. W.(1965).Some general implications of conceptual developments in the study of achievement-oriented behavior.Human motivation: A symposium,Lincoln, UK:
3. Attard, C.(2013)."If I had to pick any subject, it wouldn't be maths": Foundations for engagement with mathematics during the middle years.Mathematics Education Research Journal,25(4),569-587.
4. Biggs, J. B.(1987).Student approaches to learning and studying.Hawthorn, Australia:Australian Council for Educational Research=ACER.
5. Carini, R. M.,Kuh, G. D.,Klein, S. P.(2006).Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages.Research in Higher Education,47(1),1-32.
6. Carter, C. P.,Reschly, A. L.,Lovelace, M. D.,Appleton, J. J.,Thompson, D.(2012).Measuring student engagement among elementary students: Pilot of the student engagement instrument - Elementary version.School Psychology Quarterly,27(2),61-73.
7. Chapman, E.(2003).Alternative approaches to assessing student engagement rates.Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation,8(13)
8. Christenson, S. L.(Ed.),Reschly, A. L.(Ed.),Wylie, C.(Ed.)(2012).Handbook of research on student engagement.New York, NY:Springer.
9. Cicchetti, D.(ed.)(1990).The self in transition: Infancy to childhood.Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press.
10. Cochran, K. F.,DeRuiter, J. A.,King, R. A.(1993).Pedagogical content knowing: An integrative model for teacher preparation.Journal of Teacher Education,44(4),263-272.
11. Ernest, P.(Ed.)(1989).Mathematics teaching: The state of the art.London, UK:Falmer Press.
12. Fredricks, J. A.,Blumenfield, P. C.,Paris, A. H.(2004).School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence.Review of Educational Research,74(1),59-109.
13. Glanville, J. L.,Wildhagen, T.(2007).The measurement of school engagement: Assessing dimensionality and measurement invariance across race and ethnicity.Educational and Psychological Measurement,67(6),1019-1041.
14. Griffin, L.,Dodds, P.,Rovegno, I.(1996).Pedagogical content knowledge for teachers: Integrate everything you know to help students learn.Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance,67(9),58-61.
15. Grossman, P. L.(1991).The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education.New York, NY:Teachers College Press.
16. Jackson, P. W.(1968).Life in classroom.New York, NY:Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
17. Jackson, P. W.(Ed.)(1992).Handbook of research on curriculum: A project of the American educational research association.New York, NY:Macmillan.
18. Meece, J. L.,Blumenfeld, P. C.,Hoyle, R. H.(1988).Students' goal orientations and cognitive engagement.Journal of Educational Psychology,80(4),514-523.
19. Miserandino, M.(1996).Children who do well in school: Individual differences in perceived competence and autonomy in above-average children.Journal of Educational Psychology,88(2),203-214.
20. Mosher, R.,MacGowan, B.(1985).Assessing student engagement in secondary schools: Alternative conceptions, strategies of assessing, and instruments.Madison, WI:University of Wisconsin, Research and Development Center.
21. National Council of Teacher of Mathematics(1991).Professional standards for teaching mathematics.Reston, VA:Author.
22. Newmann, F. M.(1992).Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools.New York, NY:Teachers College Press.
23. Niess, M. L.(2005).Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge.Teaching and Teacher Education,21(5),509-523.
24. Patrick, B. C.,Skinner, E. A.,Connell, J. P.(1993).What motivates children's behavior and emotion? Joint effects of perceived control and autonomy in the academic domain.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,65(4),781-791.
25. Patton, M. Q.、吳芝儀譯、李奉儒譯(1995)。質的評鑑與研究。臺北:桂冠。
26. Schunk, D. H.(Ed.),Meece, J. L.(Ed.)(1992).Student perceptions in the classroom.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
27. Shulman, L. S.(1987).Knowledge and teaching: Foundation of the new reform.Harvard Educational Review,57(1),1-22.
28. Skinner, E. A.,Belmont, M. J.(1993).Motivation in classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year.Journal of Educational Psychology,85(4),571-581.
29. Smith, K. A.,Sheppard, S. D.,Johnson, D. W.,Johnson, R. T.(2005).Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom-based practices.Journal of Engineering Education,94(1),1-15.
30. Tall, D.(Ed.)(1991).Advanced mathematical thinking.Dordrecht, The Netherlands:Kluwer Academic Publishers.
31. Tall, D.,Vinner, S.(1981).Concept image and concept definition in mathematics with particular reference to limits and continuity.Educational Studies in Mathematics,12(2),151-169.
32. Taylor, L.,Parsons, J.(2011).Improving student engagement.Current Issues in Education,14(1)
33. Vinner, S.(1983).Concept definition, concept image and the notion of function.International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology,14(3),293-305.
34. Waxman, H. C.(Ed.),Walberg, H. J.(Ed.)(1991).Effective teaching: Current research.Berleley, CA:McCutchan Publishing Corporation.
35. 孔企平(2003)。數學教學過程中的學生參與。上海:華東師範大學。
36. 林進材(1997)。博士論文(博士論文)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學。
37. 林福來(1997)。行政院國科會專題研究計畫成果報告行政院國科會專題研究計畫成果報告,臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學數學系。
38. 邱美虹(1997)。行政院國科會專題研究計畫報告行政院國科會專題研究計畫報告,臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學數學系。
39. 教育部(2010)。國民中學九年一貫課程綱要數學學習領域。臺北:作者。
40. 謝佳叡(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學。
41. 謝佳叡(2011)。博士論文(博士論文)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學。

1. 廖本煌,陳欣民(2023)。中學數學實習師資生教學知能指標之建構：改良式德懷術之應用。教育科學研究期刊，68(1)，73-108。