题名

逐步引導注意力之多媒體教學設計對圓切線性質學習之成效研究

并列篇名

The Effects of Using Stepwise Attention-Guiding Multimedia Instruction to Learn Properties of Tangents to Circles

DOI

10.6278/tjme.20161005.001

作者

陳明璋(Ming-Jang Chen)；李俊儀(Chun-Yi Lee)；李健恆(Kin Hang Lei)；楊晨意(Chen-Yi Yang)

关键词

元素互動性 ； 逐步引導注意力 ； 認知負荷 ； 圓切線性質 ； element interactivity ； stepwise-attention guiding ； cognitive load ； properties of tangents to circle

期刊名称

臺灣數學教育期刊

卷期/出版年月

3卷2期（2016 / 10 / 01）

页次

1 - 30

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

本研究旨在探討逐步引導注意力的多媒體教學設計對國中生數學學習的影響，並選取了資訊量較複雜的幾何之圓切線性質概念為教學內容，藉著適當引導學生注意圖形的重要元素，使資訊在工作記憶區能與先備知識進行有效的整合。本研究的參與者是116位新竹縣某國中來自四個班級的八年級學生，採二因子準實驗設計以探究不同的教學設計（高元素互動vs低元素互動）與不同的學習成就（高vs低）對國中生在圓切線性質學習之影響。研究結果發現使用低元素互動教材學習的學生，後測及延後測均有較好的表現，學習效率及投入都達到較高效能的水平。高學習成就的學生如預期般表現優於低學習成就的學生，說明在擁有穩固先備知識的基礎下，逐步引導注意力的設計讓被接收的資訊作更有效的整合。因此，元素互動量在教學多媒體設計中是重要的考量因素之一，其對數學教學設計與學習的遷移及保留效果值得在未來進行更深入的的探討。
英文摘要

The purpose of this study was to explore the effects of using stepwise attention-guiding multimedia instruction on mathematics learning abilities of junior high school students. The topic ＂Properties of tangents to circles＂ was chosen as the learning content for this experiment because it involved complex information. By guiding students to observe the key elements in a geometric graph, the information in their working memory was expected to integrate effectively with prior knowledge. The participants were 116 eighth grade students from four classes in a public junior high school of Hsinchu County, Taiwan. This study adopted a quasi-experimental design of pretest and posttests with nonequivalent groups. Students were randomly divided based on the kind of instruction used into the high element interactivity group and the low element interactivity group. A two-way factorial analysis of covariance was adopted to compare the impact of the teaching materials design (high element interactivity vs. low element interactivity) and students' academic achievement (high vs. low) on learning outcomes. The results showed that the students who used the instruction with low element interactivity showed significantly better performance than those who used the instructional version with high element interactivity on both the posttest and the delayed posttest. Students were attained a higher level of efficacy in both learning efficiency and involvement. As expected, students with a high level of academic achievement demonstrated a better performance than those with lower levels. The design using guided attention led to an effective integration of external information in the working memory of students who had enough prior experience. Hence, element interactivity was a key factor in the multimedia-based instructional design. The transfer and retention effects of the instructional design of element interactivity should be further examined in the future.
主题分类 基礎與應用科學 > 數學
社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 教育部（2008）。97 年國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要數學學習領域。臺北：作者。【Taiwan Ministry of Education. (2008). General guidelines of grade 1-9 curriculum of elementary and junior high school education for mathematics learning area. Taipei, Taiwan: Author. Retrieved from http://teach.eje.edu.tw/9CC/index_new.php (in Chinese)】
  2. Arzarello, F.,Olivero, F.,Paola, D.,Robutti, O.(2002).A cognitive analysis of dragging practises in Cabri environments.ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education,34(3),66-72.
  3. Atkinson, R. K.(2002).Optimizing learning from examples using animated pedagogical agents.Journal of Educational Psychology,94(2),416-427.
  4. Ayres, P.(2013).Can the isolated-elements strategy be improved by targeting points of high cognitive load for additional practice?.Learning and Instruction,23,115-124.
  5. Ayres, P.(2006).Impact of reducing intrinsic cognitive load on learning in mathematical domain.Applied Cognitive Psychology,20,287-298.
  6. Baddeley, A.(1992).Working memory.Science,255,556-559.
  7. Bodemer, D.,Ploetzer, R.,Feuerlein, I.,Spada, H.(2004).The active integration of information during learning with dynamic interactive visualisations.Learning and Instruction,14(3),325-341.
  8. Bostic, J.,Pape, S.(2010).Examining students' perceptions of two graphing technologies and their impact on problem solving.Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching,29(2),139-154.
  9. Boucheix, J. M.,Lowe, R. K.(2010).An eye tracking comparison of external pointing cues and internal continuous cues in learning with complex animations.Learning and Instruction,20,123-135.
  10. Broadbent, D. E.(1958).Perception and Communication.New York, NY:Pergamon Press.
  11. Carroll, W. M.(1994).Using worked examples as an instructional support in the algebra classroom.Journal of Educational Psychology,86(3),360-367.
  12. Chandler, P.,Sweller, J.(1996).Cognitive load while learning to use a computer program.Applied Cognitive Psychology,10,151-170.
  13. Clarke, T.,Ayres, P.,Sweller, J.(2005).The impact of sequencing and prior knowledge on learning mathematics through spreadsheet applications.Educational Technology Research and Development,53(3),15-24.
  14. Crooks, S. M.,Cheon, J.,Inan, F.,Ari, F.,Flores, R.(2012).Modality and cueing in multimedia learning: Examining cognitive and perceptual explanations for the modality effect.Computers in Human Behavior,28,1063-1071.
  15. de Jong, T.(2010).Cognitive load theory, educational research, and instructional design: Some food for thought.Instructional Science,38(2),105-134.
  16. de Koning, B. B.,Tabbers, H. K.,Rikers, R. M. J. P.,Paas, F.(2010).Learning by generating vs. receiving instructional explanations: Two approaches to enhance attention cueing in animations.Computers & Education,55,681-691.
  17. Driver, J.(2001).A selective review of selective attention research from the past century.British Journal of Psychology,92,53-78.
  18. Gerjets, P.,Scheiter, K.,Catrambone, R.(2006).Can learning from molar and modular worked examples be enhanced by providing instructional explanations and prompting self-explanations?.Learning and Instruction,16,104-121.
  19. Graig, S. D.,Gholson, B.,Driscoll, D. M.(2002).Animated pedagogical agents in multimedia educational environments: Effects of agent properties, picture features, and redundancy.Journal of Educational Psychology,94(2),428-434.
  20. Guven, B.(2012).Using dynamic geometry software to improve eight grade students' understanding of transformation geometry.Australasian Journal of Educational Technology,28(2),364-382.
  21. Hoffman, J. E.(1979).A two-stage model of visual search.Perception & Psychophysics,25(4),319-327.
  22. Hong, W.,Thong, J. Y. L.,Tam, K. Y.(2004).Does animation attract online users' attention? The effects of flash on information search performance and perceptions.Information Systems Research,15(1),60-86.
  23. Hu, F. T.,Ginns, P.,Bobis, J.(2014).Does tracing worked examples enhance geometry learning?.Australian Journal of Educational & Developmental Psychology,14,45-49.
  24. Hu, F. T.,Ginns, P.,Bobis, J.(2015).Getting the point: Tracing worked examples enhances learning.Learning and Instruction,35,85-93.
  25. Jamet, E.(2014).An eye-tracking study of cueing effects in multimedia learning.Computers in Human Behavior,32,47-53.
  26. Jamet, E.,Gavota, M.,Quaireau, C.(2008).Attention guiding in multimedia learning.Learning and Instruction,18,135-145.
  27. Jeung, H. J.,Chandler, P.,Sweller, J.(1997).The role of visual indicators in dual sensory mode instruction.Educational Psychology,17(3),329-343.
  28. Kalyuga, S.,Sweller, J.(2004).Measuring knowledge to optimize cognitive load factors during instruction.Journal of Educational Psychology,96(3),558-568.
  29. Kester, L.,Kirschner, P. A.,van Merriënboer, J. J. G.(2006).Just-in-time information presentation: Improving learning a troubleshooting skill.Contemporary Educational Psychology,31,167-185.
  30. Leahy, W.,Sweller, J.(2005).Interactions among the imagination, expertise reversal, and element interactivity effects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied,11(4),266-276.
  31. Lee, C. Y.,Chen, M. J.(2016).Developing a questionnaire on technology-integrated mathematics instruction: A case study of the AMA training course in Xinjiang and Taiwan.British Journal of Educational Technology,47(6),1287-1303.
  32. Liu, Y(2012).Effects of integrating multimedia into the third grade mathematics curriculum to improve student learning.Journal of Educational Technology Systems,43(3),251-271.
  33. Luzón, J. M.,Letón, E.(2015).Use of animated text to improve the learning of basic mathematics.Computers & Education,88,119-128.
  34. Mammana, C.(Ed.),Villani, V.(Ed.)(1995).Perspectives on the teaching of geometry for the 21st century.Dordrecht, The Netherlands:Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  35. Mautone, P. D.,Mayer, R. E.(2001).Signaling as a cognitive guide in multimedia learning.Journal of Educational Psychology,93(2),377-389.
  36. Mayer, R. E.(2009).Multimedia learning.New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
  37. Mayer, R. E.(2001).Multimedia learning.New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
  38. Mayer, R. E.(Ed.)(2005).The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning.New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
  39. Mayer, R. E.(Ed.)(2005).The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning.New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
  40. Mayer, R. E.(Ed.)(2005).The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning.New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
  41. Mayer, R. E.,Johnson, C. I.(2008).Revising the redundancy principle in multimedia learning.Journal of Educational Psychology,100(2),380-386.
  42. Mayer, R. E.,Mathias, A.,Wetzell, K.(2002).Fostering understanding of multimedia messages through pre-training: Evidence for a two-stage theory of mental model construction.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied,8(3),147-154.
  43. Mayer, R. E.,Moreno, R.(2003).Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning.Educational Psychologist,38(1),43-52.
  44. Mevarech, Z. R.,Kramarski, B.(2003).The effects of metacognitive training versus worked-out examples on students' mathematical reasoning.British Journal of Educational Psychology,73,449-471.
  45. Miller, G. A.(1956).The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.Psychological Review,63(2),81-97.
  46. Mousavi, S. Y.,Low, R.,Sweller, J.(1995).Reducing cognitive load by mixing auditory and visual presentation modes.Journal of Educational Psychology,87(2),319-334.
  47. Muhanna, W.(2012).The effectiveness of web-based curricula on seventh grade mathematics students in Jordan.Journal of College Teaching & Learning,9(4),267-276.
  48. Müller, H. J.,Krummenacher, J.(2006).Visual search and selective attention.Visual Cognition,14,389-410.
  49. Neisser, U.(1967).Cognitive psychology.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
  50. Ogochukwu, N. V.(2010).Enhancing students interest in mathematics via multimedia presentation.African Journal of Mathematics and Computer Science Research,3(7),107-113.
  51. Paas, F. G. W. C.(1992).Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive-load approach.Journal of Educational Psychology,84(4),429-434.
  52. Paas, F. G. W. C.,Tuovinen, J. E.,van Merriënboer, J. J. G.,Darabi, A. A.(2005).A motivational perspective on the relation between mental effort and performance: Optimizing learner involvement in instruction.Educational Technology Research and Development,53(3),25-34.
  53. Paas, F. G. W. C.,van Merriënboer, J. J. G.(1993).The efficiency of instructional conditions: An approach to combine mental effort and performance measures.Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society,35(4),737-743.
  54. Pashler, H.(1988).Cross-dimensional interaction and texture segregation.Perception & Psychophysics,43(4),307-318.
  55. Pashler, H.(Ed.)(1998).Attention.London, UK:University College London Press.
  56. Pollock, E.,Chandler, P.,Sweller, J.(2002).Assimilating complex information.Learning and Instruction,12,61-86.
  57. Ragasa, C. Y.(2008).A comparison of computer-assisted instruction and the traditional method of teaching basic statistics.Journal of Statistics Education,16(1)
  58. Richland, L. E.,Hansen, J.(2013).Reducing cognitive load in learning by analyogy.International Journal of Psychological Studies,5(4),69-80.
  59. Rummer, R.,Schweppe, J.,Fürstenberg, A.,Scheiter, K.,Zindler, A.(2011).The perceptual basis of the modality effect in multimedia learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied,17(2),159-173.
  60. Scheiter, K.,Gerjets, P.,Catrambone, R.(2006).Making the abstract concrete: Visualizing mathematical solution procedures.Computers in Human Behavior,22,9-25.
  61. Schmidt-Weigand, F.,Kohnert, A.,Glowalla, U.(2010).A closer look at split visual attention in system- and self-paced instruction in multimedia learning.Learning and Instruction,20,100-110.
  62. Sutherland, R.(Ed.),Mason, J.(Ed.)(1995).Exploiting Mental Imagery with Computers in Mathematics Education.Berlin, Germany:Springer.
  63. Sweller, J.(2010).Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load.Educational Psychology Review,22,123-138.
  64. Sweller, J.(1988).Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning.Cognitive Science,12,257-285.
  65. Sweller, J.(1994).Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional desegn.Learning and Instruction,4,295-312.
  66. Sweller, J.,Ayres, P.,Kalyuga, S.(2011).Cognitive load theory.New York, NY:Springer.
  67. Sweller, J.,Chandler, P.(1994).Why some material is difficult to learn.Cognition and Instruction,12(3),185-233.
  68. Sweller, J.,Chandler, P.,Tierney, P.,Cooper, M.(1990).Cognitive load as a factor in the structuring of technical material.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,119(2),176-192.
  69. Sweller, J.,Cooper, G. A.(1985).The use of worked examples as a substitute for problem solving in learning algebra.Cognition and Instruction,2(1),59-89.
  70. Treisman, A.(1986).Features and objects in visual processing.Scientific American,255(5),114-125.
  71. Treisman, A. M.,Gelade, G.(1980).A feature-integration theory of attention.Cognitive Psychology,12,97-136.
  72. van Gog, T.,Kester, L.(2012).A test of the testing effect: Acquiring problem-solving skills from worked examples.Cognitive Science,36,1532-1541.
  73. Yantis, S.,Jonides, J.(1990).Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Voluntary versus automatic allocation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,16(1),121-134.
  74. Yantis, S.,Jonides, J.(1984).Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,10(5),601-621.
  75. 左台益編(2012)。國民中學數學第五冊。臺南=Tainan, Taiwan:南一=Nani。
被引用次数
  1. 蔡浩軒,孟瑛如(2020)。擴增實境（AR）之比與比值數學教材對國小六年級學習障礙學生學習及課堂注意力成效提升之探討。特殊教育學報，51，65-99。
print cancel