以PISA 2012探究臺灣學生性情經歷因素對數學焦慮之影響

Using PISA 2012 to Explore the Effects of Dispositional Antecedents on Taiwanese Students' Mathematics Anxiety

10.6278/tjme.202210_9(2).002

林郁婷(Yu-Ting Lin)；龔心怡(Hsin-Yi Kung)

性情經歷因素 ； 國際學生能力評量計畫2012 ； 數學焦慮 ； dispositional antecedents ； PISA 2012 ； mathematics anxiety

臺灣數學教育期刊

9卷2期（2022 / 10 / 01）

33 - 62

繁體中文

本研究以Cemen（1987）所提出的數學焦慮反應模式為理論基礎，探討臺灣學生的性情經歷因素對數學焦慮之預測，以PISA 2012填答B式問卷之2,011位臺灣學生為研究樣本，依據相關理論及文獻建構性情經歷因素之高階模式，及性情經歷因素對數學焦慮的結構模式。藉由結構方程模式分析後，整體模式所獲得的適配度指標顯示模式可被接受，獲致的結果如下，第一，性情經歷因素之高階因素成立，可由「數學自信」、「數學態度」、「成就歸因」三個二階分構念代表，其中「數學態度」又由五個一階次構念所組成；第二，臺灣學生性情經歷因素與數學焦慮之結構模式成立，學生的性情經歷因素對數學焦慮具有顯著且負向的直接預測。本研究最後根據研究結果提出建議，供教師與學生及後續研究之參考。

Based on the mathematical anxiety response model proposed by Cemen (1987), this study explored the effects of dispositional antecedents on Taiwanese students' mathematics anxiety. The study participants were 2,011 Taiwanese students who completed the student questionnaire form B in the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2012 dataset. A higher-order model of the dispositional antecedents and a structural model of the dispositional antecedents on students' mathematics anxiety were constructed. Utilizing the structural equation modeling, the results indicated as follows. First, the higher-order model of dispositional antecedents can be represented by the three second-order sub-factors of ＂mathematical confidence,＂ ＂mathematical attitude,＂ and ＂achievement attribution,＂ with ＂mathematical attitude＂ composed of five first-order sub-factors. Second, the structural model of Taiwanese students' dispositional antecedents and mathematical anxiety had a reasonable fit. Students' dispositional antecedents had significant and negative direct effects on mathematical anxiety. Further, the implications of these findings were discussed and recommendations were made for teachers, students, and future researchers.

1. 周玉秀（2006）。從PISA看數學素養與中小學數學教育。科學教育月刊，293，2–21。
   連結：
2. Ahmed, W., Minnaert, A., Kuyper, H., & Van der Werf, G. (2012). Reciprocal relationships between math self-concept and math anxiety. Learning and Individual Difference, 22(3), 385–389.
   連結：
3. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230–258.
   連結：
4. Bursal, M., & Paznokas, L. (2006). Mathematics anxiety and preservice elementary teachers' confidence to teach mathematics and science. School Science and Mathematics, 106(4), 173–180.
   連結：
5. D’Agostino, A., Schirripa Spagnolo, F., & Salvati, N. (2022). Studying the relationship between anxiety and school achievement: Evidence from PISA data. Statistical Methods & Applications, 31(1), 1-20.
   連結：
6. Dew, K. H., & Galassi, J. P. (1983). Mathematics anxiety: Some basic issues. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 30(3), 443–446.
   連結：
7. Dowker, A., Sarkar, A., & Looi, C. Y. (2016). Mathematics anxiety: What have we learned in 60 years?. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 508.
   連結：
8. Dreger, R. M., & Aiken Jr, L. R. (1957). The identification of number anxiety in a college population. Journal of Educational Psychology, 48(6), 344–351.
   連結：
9. Eysenck, M. W., & Calvo, M. G. (1992). Anxiety and performance: The processing efficiency theory. Cognition and Emotion, 6(6), 409–434.
   連結：
10. Fennema, E., & Sherman, J. A. (1976). Fennema-Sherman mathematics attitudes scales: Instruments designed to measure attitudes toward the learning of mathematics by females and males. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 7(5), 324–326.
    連結：
11. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.
    連結：
12. Gresham, F. M. (2004). Current status and future directions of school-based behavioral interventions. School Psychology Review, 33(3), 326–343.
    連結：
13. Hembree, R. (1990). The nature, effects, and relief of mathematics anxiety. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(1), 33–46.
    連結：
14. Hoelter, J. W. (1983). The analysis of covariance structures: Goodness-of-fit indices. Sociological Methods & Research, 11(3), 325–344.
    連結：
15. MacLeod, C., & Mathews, A. (2012). Cognitive bias modification approaches to anxiety. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 8, 189–217.
    連結：
16. Namkung, J. M., Peng, P., & Lin, X. (2019). The relation between mathematics anxiety and mathematics performance among school-aged students: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 89(3), 459–496.
    連結：
17. OECD (2014). PISA 2012 results: What students know and can do – Student performance in mathematics, reading and science (Volume I, Revised edition, February 2014). Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
    連結：
18. OECD (2017). PISA 2015 results (Volume III): Student’s well-being. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
    連結：
19. OECD (2019). PISA 2018 results (Volume II): Where all students can succeed. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
    連結：
20. Pekrun, R. (2000). A social-cognitive, control-value theory of achievement emotions. In J. Heckhausen (Ed.), Motivational psychology of human development: Developing motivation and motivating development (pp. 143–163). Elsevier Science.
    連結：
21. Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 315–341.
    連結：
22. Rada, E., & Lucietto, A. M. (2022). Math anxiety－A literature review on confounding factors. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 5(2), 117–129.
    連結：
23. Rech, J., Hartzell, J., & Stephens, L. (1993). Comparisons of mathematical competencies and attitudes of elementary education majors with established norms of a general college population. School Science and Mathematics, 93(3), 141–144.
    連結：
24. Reyes, L. H. (1984). Affective variables and mathematics education. The Elementary School Journal, 84(5), 558-581.
    連結：
25. Richardson, F. C., & Suinn, R. M. (1972). The mathematics anxiety rating scale: Psychometric data. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 19(6), 551–554.
    連結：
26. Skinner, E., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., & Kindermann, T. (2008). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 765–781.
    連結：
27. Yuan, Z., Tan, J., & Ye, R. (2022). A cross-national study of mathematics anxiety. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher.
    連結：
28. Zan, R., Brown, L., Evans, J., & Hannula, M. S. (2006). Affect in mathematics education: An introduction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 113–121.
    連結：
29. Zimmerman, B. J., Bandura, A., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Self-motivation for academic attainment: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal setting. American Educational Research Journal, 29(3), 663–676.
    連結：
30. 余民寧（2006）。潛在變項模式：SIMPLIS的應用。臺北市：高等教育文化。
31. 涂金堂（1995）。國小學生後設認知、數學焦慮與數學解題表現之相關研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。
32. 教育部（2018）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校－數學領域。取自https://www.naer.edu.tw/PageSyllabus?fid=52
33. 臺灣PISA國家研究中心（主編）（2015）。臺灣PISA 2012結果報告。新北市：心理出版社。
34. 譚寧君（1992）。兒童數學態度與解題能力之分析探討。臺北師院學報，5，619–688。
35. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
36. Branscombe, N. R., & Baron, R. A. (2017). Social Psychology (14th ed.). London, UK: Pearson.
37. Byrd, P. G. (1982). A descriptive study of mathematics anxiety: Its nature and antecedents (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.
38. Cemen, P. B. (1987). The nature of mathematics anxiety. Stillwater, OK: Oklahoma State University.
39. Diamantopoulos, A., & Siguaw, J. A. (2000). Introducing LISREL: A guide for the uninitiated. London, UK: SAGE.
40. Feltz, D. L. (1988). Self-confidence and sports performance. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 16(1), 423–457.
41. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan.
42. Marcoulides, G. A., & Schumacker, R. E. (2013). Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques. London, UK: Psychology Press.
43. McLeod, D. B. (1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualization. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 575–596). New York, NY: Macmillan. Retrieved from https://peterliljedahl.com/wp-content/uploads/Affect-McLeod.pdf
44. Rosenberg, M. J., & Hovland, C. I. (1960). Cognitive, affective, and behavioral components of attitudes. In M. J. Rosenberg & C. I. Hovland (Eds.), Attitude organization and change (pp. 1–14). New Haven: Yale University Press.
45. Rothenberg, L. F., & Harrington II, C. F. (1994). The relationship between anxiety and achievement in adult learners. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED370996)
46. Rubin, D. B. (2004). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
47. Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2015). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
48. Spielberger, C. D. (Ed.). (1972). Anxiety: Current trends in theory and research (Volume II). New York, NY: Academic Press.
49. Sriampai, P. (1988). Attitude toward mathematics, mathematics anxiety, and mathematics achievement related to gender and academic program (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Missouri, Columbia, MI.
50. Weiner, B. (Ed.). (1974). Achievement motivation and attribution theory. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.