數學探究教學的任務與學生的回應：一位大學數學教師教學實踐歷程的觀察

Teaching Tasks and Student Responses in an Inquiry-Based College Mathematics Course: A Case Study

10.6278/tjme.202310_10(2).003

徐偉民(Wei-Min Hsu)；張國綱(Kuo-Kung Chang)；郭文金(Wen-Jin Kuo)

個案研究 ； 教學任務 ； 數學探究教學 ； 學生回應 ； case study ； teaching task ； student response ； inquiry-based mathematics instruction

臺灣數學教育期刊

10卷2期（2023 / 10 / 01）

55 - 81

繁體中文;英文

本研究旨在探討大學數學課程實施探究教學歷程中教師關注的任務與學生回應。採個案研究法，以107學年度上學期「數學探索」課程中的師生為對象，透過教學錄影與觀察、師生訪談、學生問卷和解題討論來蒐集資料。質性資料轉錄後進行歸類分析，量化資料以平均數來呈現，以不同資料與人員的比對來進行三角校正。結果發現，教師的數學探究教學在「佈題－解題」的歷程中展開，教師以挑戰性問題來佈題，以提問的方式來引導學生釐清並完成解題。從教師提問的焦點來看，其教學歷程較關注的是提供線索與搭橋、要求學生說明兩個任務，而教師關注的任務引發的學生回應聚焦在搜尋比對和解題。從學生訪談和問卷的結果來看，大都肯定與經歷了探究對數學學習的價值。

This study investigated teaching tasks and student responses in a college-level mathematics course taught through an inquiry-based approach in the fall semester of 2018. The case study method was employed, and data were collected from video footage and observations of classes, interviews with teachers and students, discussions regarding problem solving, and a questionnaire. Qualitative data were classified on the basis of the teacher's and students' performance, and quantitative data were gathered from the questionnaire. In addition, triangulation was conducted on the analytical results and data, which were gathered from multiple sources. The results of this study indicated that the teacher's inquiry-based mathematics instruction followed the process of "problem proposal and solution." Specifically, the teacher assigned challenging tasks to the students to spark their motivation for inquiry. He then adopted the strategy of posing questions to guide the students through problems that required clarification and solutions. Analyzing the teacher's questions, we found that the tasks assigned by the teacher were primarily related to "providing hints and bridging" and "asking for explanation." The students' learning process focused on the tasks of "searching and comparison" and "problem solving." According to each of the student's performance on the questionnaire and interview, most of them stated that the inquiry-based approach enabled them to understand the value of mathematics instruction.

1. 徐偉民, W.-M.(2013)。國小教師數學教科書使用之初探。科學教育學刊，21(1)，25-48。
   連結：
2. 徐偉民, W.-M.,張國綱, K.-K.(2010)。師資培育數學課程對國小教師數學教學意象影響之研究。當代教育研究季刊，18(4)，41-77。
   連結：
3. Allmond, S.,Wells, J.,Makar, K.(2010).Thinking through mathematics: Engaging students with inquiry-based learning.Curriculum Press.
4. Allmond, S.,Wells, J.,Makar, K.(2010).Thinking through mathematics: Engaging students with inquiry-based learning.Curriculum Press.
5. Allmond, S.,Wells, J.,Makar, K.(2010).Thinking through mathematics: Engaging students with inquiry-based learning.Curriculum Press.
6. Artzt, A. F.,Armour-Thomas, E.(2002).Becoming a reflective mathematics teacher: A guide for observations and self-assessment.Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Bonotto, C.(2013).Artifacts as sources for problem-posing activities.Educational Studies in Mathematics,83(1),37-55.
8. Borasi, R.(1992).Learning mathematics through inquiry.Heinemann.
9. Campos, D. G.(2010).Peirce’s philosophy of mathematical education: Fostering reasoning abilities for mathematical inquiry.Studies in Philosophy and Education,29(5),421-439.
10. Cifarelli, V. V.,Cai, J.(2005).The evolution of mathematical explorations in open-ended problem solving situations.The Journal of Mathematical Behavior,24(3–4),302-324.
11. Cilli-Turner, E.(2017).Impacts of inquiry pedagogy on undergraduate students conceptions of the function of proof.The Journal of Mathematical Behavior,48,14-21.
12. Hähkiöniemi, M.(2013).Teacher’s reflection on experimenting with technology-enriched inquiry-based mathematics teaching with planned teaching unit.The Journal of Mathematical Behavior,32(3),295-308.
13. Henningsen, M.,Stein, M. K.(1997).Mathematical tasks and student cognition: Classroom-based factors that support and inhabit high-level mathematical thinkingand reasoning.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,28(5),524-549.
14. Johnson, E.(2013).Teachers’ mathematical activity in inquiry-oriented instruction.The Journal of Mathematical Behavior,32(4),761-775.
15. Johnson, E.,Caughman, J.,Fredericks, J.,Gibson, L.(2013).Implementing inquiry-oriented curriculum: From the mathematicians’ perspective.The Journal of Mathematical Behavior,32(4),743-760.
16. Kuster, G.,Johnson, E.,Keene, K.,Andrew-Larson, C.(2018).Inquiry-oriented instruction: A conceptualization of the instructional principles.PRIMUS,28(1),13-30.
17. Lim, W.,Lee, J. E.,Tyson, K.,Kim, H. J.,Kim, J.(2020).An integral part of facilitating mathematical discussion: Follow-up questioning.International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,18(2),377-398.
18. Makar, K.(2012).The pedagogy of mathematical inquiry.Pedagogy: New developments in the learning sciences
19. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development(2018).PISA 2021 mathematics framework (Draft).OECD Publishing.
20. Rasmussen, C.,Kwon, O. N.(2007).An inquiry-oriented approach to undergraduate mathematics.The Journal of Mathematical Behavior,26(3),189-194.
21. Reitman, W. R.(1965).Cognition and thought: An information-processing approach.Wiley.
22. Richards, J.(1991).Mathematical discussions.Radical constructivism in mathematics education
23. Santos-Trigo, M.,Camacho-Machin, M.(2009).Towards the construction of a framework to deal with routine problems to foster mathematical inquiry.PRIMUS,19(3),260-279.
24. Sfard, A.(2008).Thinking as communicating: Human development, the growth of discourses, and mathematizing.Cambridge University Press.
25. Silver, E. A.(1997).Fostering creativity through instruction rich in mathematical problem solving and problem posing.ZDM−Mathematics Education,29(3),75-80.
26. Staer, H.,Goodrum, D.,Hackling, M.(1998).High school laboratory work in Western Australia: Openness to enquiry.Research in Science Education,28(2),219-228.
27. Stein, M. K.,Remillard, J.,Smith, M. S.(2007).How curriculum influences student learning.Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning
28. Strogatz, S. (2010, May 9). The Hilbert Hotel. New York Times. https://archive.nytimes.com/opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/05/09/the-hilbert-hotel/。
29. Uhling, F.(2002).The role of proof in comprehending and teaching elementary linear algebra.Educational Studies in Mathematics,50(3),335-346.
30. Wawro, M.(2015).Reasoning about solutions in linear algebra: The case of Abraham and the Invertible Matrix Theorem.International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education,1(3),315-338.
31. Wawro, M.,Rasmussen, C.,Zandieh, M.,Sweeney, G. F.,Larson, C.(2012).An inquiry-oriented approach to span and linear independence: The case of the Magic Carpet Ride sequence.PRIMUS,22(8),577-599.
32. 林勇吉, Y.-C.,秦爾聰, E.-T.,段曉林, H.-L.(2014)。數學探究之意義初探與教學設計實例。臺灣數學教師，35(2)，1-18。
33. 秦爾聰, E.-T.,林勇吉, Y.-C.,林晶珮, C.-P.,段曉林, H.-L.(2009)。數學探究教學對數學解題能力提升之個案研究。科學教育研究與發展季刊，55，83-116。
34. 歐用生, Y.-S.(2000)。內容分析法。教育研究法