The Application of Reverse Mortgages in Aging Society

反向房屋貸款在高齡社會的應用

10.30003/JRM.200811.0004

黄泓智(Hong-Chih Huang)；吳文傑(Wen-Chieh Wu)；林左裕(Tsoyu Calvin Lin)；鄭雅丰(Ya-Fu Cheng)

反向房屋抵押貸款 ； 房屋轉換計畫 ； 高齡社會 ； reverse mortgage ； home reversion ； aging society

風險管理學報

10卷3期（2008 / 11 / 01）

293 - 314

英文

人口老化及低生育率已是全世界各國共同的現象，平均壽命隨著經濟發展所帶來醫療及居住環境之改善而快速延長中，退休準備不足因此成為一個嚴重且急迫的議題，具有高可取得性的反向房屋抵押貸款是除了國民年金、企業退休金、個人儲蓄等一般之退休來源之外的一個新的選擇。本研究探討金融機構在發行反向房屋抵押貸款商品或是政府提供反向房屋抵押貸款商品之保證保險時所承受的風險，研究結果顯示性別與年齡、貸款利率、房價報酬率、房價標準差和可貸款額度對反向房屋抵押貸款之保險人或發行機構之風險都有顯著的影響。因此，金融機構在發行反向房屋抵押貸款商品或是政府提供反向房屋抵押貸款商品之保證保險時，若缺乏適當的風險控管，可能會產生高額的損失。

Due to the low mortality rates and decreased fertility, as well as the subsequent increased aging problems, insufficient pensions have become a worldwide serious issue. In addition to traditional resources, such as public and private pensions, commercial annuities, individual savings and investments, reverse mortgages provide a new resource option for retirement. We investigate the application of reverse mortgages to retirement and analyze the risk for both governments and financial institutions of issuing reverse mortgage products. Numerical results show that gender, age, loan rate, the return of house price, and the maximum loan amount have significant impact on the risk of issuing reverse mortgages. These factors are very sensitive to the loss distributions of reverse mortgages, therefore risk management is a crucial means for governments and financial institutions to control the risk of reverse mortgages to avoid huge losses.

1. Bank of Canada Working Paper
2. Arslan, Y.,B. Guler(2006).Unpublished Ph. D. Dissertation, Department of Economic, Rochester University.
3. Berg, N.,A.Y. Gu,D. Lien(2007).Dynamic Correlation: A Tool for Hedging House Price Risk?.Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management,13,18-28.
4. Boehm, T.P.,M.C. Ehrhardt(1994).Reverse Mortgages an Interest Rate Risk.Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association,22,387-408.
5. Cheng, W.H.,S.S. Fang(1995).Research report.Department of the Interior.
6. Cox, J.C.,J.E. Ingersoll,S.A. Ross(1985).A Theory of the Term Structure of Interest Rates.Econometrica,53,385-407.
7. Davidoff, T.,G. Welke(2005).UC Berkeley,Haas School of Business.
8. DiVenti, T.R.,T.N. Herzog(1990).Modeling Home Equity Conversion Mortgages.Actuarial Research Clearing House.
9. Raising Money from Your Home
10. Gau, G.W.(1987).Efficient Real Estimate Markets: Paradox or Paradigm?.Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association,15,1-12.
11. Rodda, D.T.,K. Lam,A. Youn(2004).Stochastic Modeling of Federal Housing Administration Home Equity Conversion Mortgages with Low-Cost-Refinancing.Real Estate Economics,32,589-617.
12. Stucki, B.R.(2006).Using Reverse Mortgages to Manage the Financial Risk of Long Term Care.North American Actuarial Journal,10,90-102.
13. Szymanoski, E.J.(1994).Risk and the Home Equity Conversion Mortgage.Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association,22,347-366.
14. Tsatsaronis K.,H. Zhu(2004).What Drives Housing Price Dynamics: Cross-Country Evidence.BIS Quarterly Review,March,65-78.
15. Venti, S.F.,D.A. Wise(2001).Aging and Housing Equity: Another Look.NBER Working Paper No.8608.
16. Wu, S.C.,C. Wang,W.I. Lin,Y.C. Wu,J.C. Wang(2001).Constructing the Long Term Care System-First Year Plan.Report supported by Department of the Interior.
17. Zhu, H.(2006).The Structure of Housing Finance Markets and House Prices in Asia.BIS Quarterly Review.

1. 曾明宗,林左裕(2017)。影響金融業辦理逆向抵押貸款因素之研究。土地問題研究季刊，16(2)，2-26。
2. 劉文彬、王儷玲、王正偉(2011)。臺灣實施反向房屋抵押貸款對提升退休所得之影響。風險管理學報，13(1)，25-48。
3. 劉議謙,黃綱毅,李永琮(2021)。我國反向房屋抵押貸款商品之模型與評價。證券市場發展季刊，33(2)，153-194。
4. 羅玉皓、李永琮(2016)。反向房屋抵押貸款商品結構分析。臺大管理論叢，26(2)，139-172。
5. 商懿勻、林隆儀(2015)。老年經濟安全保障、理財知識與逆向抵押貸款意願之研究。輔仁管理評論，22(2)，65-94。
6. 商懿勻、林聖薇、林隆儀、林國森(2015)。老年經濟安全保障與理財知識對逆向抵押貸款借款意願的影響─涉入的干擾效果。聯大學報，12(1)，159-177。
7. 王文楷(2019)。不動產逆向抵押貸款評價與提前解約之分析。住宅學報，28(2)，63-80。
8. 吳明哲(2018)。以房養老市場投資需求因素之研究－新均衡理論與模糊分析階層程序法之應用。住宅學報，27(1)，47-77。
9. 嚴秀容、張幸惠、姚名麗(2015)。反向房屋抵押貸款的影響因素之研究。輔仁管理評論，22(2)，95-114。
10. 楊博翔、林左裕(2001)。逆向房屋抵押貸款在臺灣推行之需求分析。住宅學報，20(1)，-109-125。
11. 張金鶚、王健安(2016)。現行所謂「公益版」不動產逆向抵押貸款之設計提供多少的「社會福利」效果？。住宅學報，25(1)，37-75。