题名

傳統市場與漁市場地板抗滑性與攤商滑跌倒經驗調查

并列篇名

Floor Slip-Resistance & Workers’ Experiences of Slip & Fall at Traditional and Fish Markets

作者

劉立文(Liwen Liu);陳志勇(Chih-Yong Chen);陳慶忠(Ching Chung Chen);李開偉(Kai Way Li);林軒丞(Hsuan Cheng Lin)

关键词

滑跌倒 ; 地板抗滑性 ; 摩擦係數 ; 現場量測 ; Slip & Fall ; Floor slip-resistance ; Coefficient of Friction ; Field measurement

期刊名称

勞動及職業安全衛生研究季刊

卷期/出版年月

24卷4期(2016 / 12 / 15)

页次

368 - 376

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

滑跌倒事故在世界各國都是職業傷害的主要成因。本研究以傳統市場與漁市場各兩處之24處攤商進行地板摩擦係數量測與人員滑跌倒經驗訪談之調查。地板摩擦係數以Brungraber Mark II量測器在每處攤商工作區域地板上之八個量測點進行量測。研究結果發現傳統市場地板摩擦係數顯著的高於漁市場;若以銷售產品別區分,地板摩擦係數最低者為魚貨攤、其次依序為雞肉攤、蔬菜攤、豬肉攤、及乾貨攤,此順序可反應各類攤位之滑跌倒風險之高低順序。人員滑跌倒經驗訪談之結果顯示漁市場攤商人員有滑跌倒經驗的比例是傳統市場人員的2.37倍,漁市場人員目睹他人滑跌倒之比例是傳統市場人員的1.78倍。此結果與地板摩擦係數量測結果一致,亦符合吾人對兩類市場地板環境之預期。

英文摘要

Slip & fall incidences are causes for major occupational safety & health events globally. This research investigated coefficients of friction (COF) of floors and workers’ experiences of slip & fall in 24 stands at two traditional and two fish markets. The measurements of COF of floors were conducted by using the Brungraber Mark II device on 8 spots in each of the stands. The results showed that the traditional markets had significant higher floor friction than those in the fish markets. Comparing the selling product, the fish stands had significant the lowest COF, next was the chicken stands, then the vegetable stands, the next pork stands, and finally the dry stuff stands. This order reflects the risk of slip & fall from high to low. Workers’ interview results showed the percentage of workers with slip & fall experience in the fish markets was 2.37 times than that of the traditional markets. The percentage of workers with experience of witness slip & fall of others in the fish markets was 1.78 times than that of the traditional markets. This was consistent with the findings in the COF measurements. It also coincides with our expectation in the market floor environments.

主题分类 醫藥衛生 > 預防保健與衛生學
醫藥衛生 > 社會醫學
工程學 > 市政與環境工程
参考文献
  1. http://www.wainjurylaw.com/
  2. http://www.noskidding.com
  3. http://www.hse.gov.uk/
  4. American Society for Testing and Materials(2005).F-1677-96. Standard method of test for using a portable inclinable articulated strut slip tester (PIAST).Annual Book of ASTM Standards. vol. 15.07,West Conshohochen, PA:
  5. Anderson, C(Ed.),Senne, J.(Ed.)(1978).Walkway surfaces: measurement of slip resistance.Philadelphia, PA:American Society for Testing and Materials.
  6. Chang, WR(2002).The effects of slip criteria and time on friction measurements.Safety Sciece,40,593-611.
  7. Chang, WR,Li, KW,Huang, YH,Filiaggi, A,Courtney, TK(2006).Objective and subjective measures in fast food restaurants in the USA and their comparison with the results obtained previously in Taiwan.Safety Science,44,891-903.
  8. Chang, WR,Li, KW,Huang, YH,Filiaggi, A,Courtney, TK(2004).Assessing floor slipperiness in fast-food restaurants in Taiwan using objective and subjective measures.Applied Ergonomics,35,401-08.
  9. Courtney, TK,Verma, S,Huang, YH,Chang, WR,Li, KW,Filiaggi, AJ(2010).Factors associated with worker slipping in limited service restaurants.Injury Prevention,16,36-41.
  10. Hanson, JP,Redfern, MS,Mazumdar, M(1999).Predicting slips and falls considering required and available friction.Ergonomics,42,1619-33.
  11. Hsu, YW,Li, KW(2010).A field assessment of floor slipperiness in a fish market in Taiwan.Safety Science,48,556-61.
  12. Leamon, TB,Murphy, PL(1995).Occupational slips and falls: more than a trivial problem.Ergonomics,38,487-98.
  13. Li, KW,Chang, W-R,Leamon, TB,Chen, CJ(2004).Floor slipperiness measurement: friction coefficient, roughness of floors, and subjective perception under spillage conditions.Safety Science,42,547-65.
  14. Li, KW,Courtney, TK,Huang, YH,Chang, WR,Filiaggi, A(2006).Slipping and Falling Experience and Perception of Floor Slipperiness: a Field Survey in Ten Fast-Food Restaurants in Taiwan.Professional Safety,34,34-38.
  15. Li, KW,Hsu, YW,Chang, WR,Lin, CH(2007).Friction Measurements on Three Commonly used Floors on a College Campus Under Dry, Wet, and Sand-Covered Conditions.Safety Science,45,980-92.
  16. Li, KW,Wu, HH,Lin, YC(2006).The effect of shoe sole tread groove depth on the friction coefficient with different sole materials, floors, and contaminants.Applied Ergonomics,37,743-48.
  17. Liu, L,Li, KW,Lee, YH,Chen, CC,Chen, CY(2010).Friction measurements on "anti-slip" floors under shoe sole, contamination, and inclination conditions.Safety Science,48,1321-26.
  18. Myung, R,Smith, JL,Leamon, TB(1993).Subjective assessment of floor slipperiness.International Journal of Industry Ergonomic,11,313-19.
  19. Strandberg, L,Lanshammar, H(1981).The dynamics of slipping accidents.Journal of Occupational Accidents,3,153-162.
  20. 行政院勞工委員會勞工檢查處(2010)。中華民國 99年勞動檢查年報
  21. 行政院勞工委員會勞工檢查處(2009)。中華民國 98年勞動檢查年報
  22. 行政院勞工委員會勞工檢查處(2011)。中華民國 100年勞動檢查年報
  23. 行政院勞工委員會勞工檢查處(2008)。中華民國 97年勞動檢查年報
  24. 行政院勞工委員會勞工檢查處(2007)。中華民國 96年勞動檢查年報
  25. 行政院勞工委員會勞工檢查處(2013)。中華民國 102年勞動檢查年報
  26. 行政院勞工委員會勞工檢查處(2012)。中華民國 101年勞動檢查年報
被引用次数
  1. 羅宜文,劉立文,陳慶忠,陳志勇,陳之璇,杜珮君(2022)。長照機構地板抗滑性與照服員跌倒經驗調查。勞動及職業安全衛生研究季刊,30(3),27-41。