题名

臺灣工時豁免相關法規與實務運作現況淺析

并列篇名

An Analysis of Relevant Regulations and Practices of Working Hours Exemption in Taiwan

作者

彭素玲(Su-Ling Peng);徐廣正(Guang-Zheng Xu)

关键词

工時豁免 ; 勞動基準法 ; 責任制 ; 白領高薪人員 ; Working time exemption ; Labor Standards Act ; Exempt Employee ; White-collar High-paying Management and Supervisor

期刊名称

勞動及職業安全衛生研究季刊

卷期/出版年月

28卷4期(2020 / 12 / 15)

页次

93 - 114

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本文透過國內外文獻與資料之研析與彙整,檢視自90年代起國內陸續公布修正之勞動基準法第84條之1的適用工作者之施行與增刪之相關背景,以及國際相關法規執行之發展趨勢與沿革,並針對歷年有關勞動基準法第84條之1的工作者之相關爭議與訴訟爭點,加以討論相關法規於實務面運作之概況與可能衍生爭議的原因;而後並針對主要縣市地方主管機關公布之勞動基準法第84條之1的適用工作者之核備名單,以及深度訪談結果,加以檢視並歸納彙整現階段勞動基準法第84條之1相關法規與實務運作的效益與觀察,作為國內工時豁免相關制度之未來發展規劃與修正建議之背景與參考。

英文摘要

By means of the analysis and review of literature and materials, this paper draws from the relevant background of the implementation, addition and deletion of applicable workers of Article 84-1 of Labor Standards Act. By referring to the implementation of relevant international regulations, the practical operation and revision of major countries, we summarize the benefits and observations of relevant regulations and practical operations of Article 84-1 of Labor Standards Act, as the future planning and reference of the working time exemption. The main findings and conclusions of the research are as follows: 1. Major countries have recently adjusted and revised the application of working time exemption due to practical needs. For example, Japan and Taiwan have included high-paying white-collar workers as applicable workers; South Korea has restricted working time exemption for applicable industries in 2018, and gradually implemented the application according to the size of the enterprise. It shows that countries can adjust applicable standards and implementation schedules according to their policy objectives and practical needs. 2. Regularly reviewing the implementation and operation of the working time exemption to meet economic development changes and actual needs. In addition, countries such as the United States, Australia, and the Netherlands have adjusted their applicable salary thresholds. 3. The application or verification of domestic working time exemption (Article 84-1 of the Labor Standards Law) is not common; moreover, related lawsuits are mostly due to incomplete administrative procedures. 4. The development trend of working time exemption: (1) Due to the epidemic situation and technological development (automatic machinery, AI smart technology application), the work/service mode of the labor market is becoming more and more diversified, and policy planning and design need to take the above considerations into consideration. (2) The importance of labor-management negotiations or group agreements, and strive for better working conditions. (3) Laws and regulations should consider the characteristics of various industries and impose different regulatory restrictions. (4) Regularly review the salary threshold setting standard, calculation method and scope of the high salary responsibility system. The relevant policy recommendations, as far as short-term plans are concerned, mainly include: 1. Considering promulgating the principles of working time guidance and examination guidelines. Understand the needs of all walks of life and resolve differences, enhancing the promotion of relevant policies, gradually expanding or customizing the promulgation of working time guidance and examination guidelines to implement the policies. 2. Enhancing social (labor-management) dialogue and participation helps both parties communicate their opinions and reduce disputes. In order to balance the negotiation advantages and skills of both parties, the role of the labor union can be strengthened to enhance its strength. 3. Standardizing the salary threshold of high-paying white-collar workers (average monthly salary of 150,000 or more) according to different professions and occupational characteristics, or set annual salary ratio and annual salary calculation standards. Regarding the job inspection of supervisory and managerial personnel, through labor-management consultations and obtaining mutual consent, they can be handled flexibly without departing from the principles of current laws and regulations. 4. Reviewing the needs and applicability of existing applicable workers, such as whether standby jobs are included in applicable workers. Due to changes in the service or employment mode of the industry, there are few actual verifications of certain categories, and should be reviewed and revised regularly to meet the actual needs of society. As for the mid- and long-term proposals, the following are included: Achieve consensus on the establishment of (professional) proprietary laws; establish communication channels and platforms for the application of working time exemption; relax policy flexibility and increase efficiency.

主题分类 醫藥衛生 > 預防保健與衛生學
醫藥衛生 > 社會醫學
工程學 > 市政與環境工程
参考文献
  1. https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_ILO_CODE:C001
  2. 朱柔若(2000)。先進國家工時制度之比較。勞資關係月刊,3(19),6-20。
  3. 行政院主計總處。106 年人力運用調查報告。臺北:行政院主計總處;2017。
  4. 行政院主計總處。107 年人力運用調查報告。臺北:行政院主計總處;2018。
  5. 李佑均(2016)。臺北,國立臺灣大學科際整合法律學研究所。
  6. 李思嫻(2012)。有關勞動基準法部分工作性質特殊工作之法規範與檢討。臺灣勞工季刊,30,72-79。
  7. 林秀蘭(2008)。臺北,東吳大學法律系。
  8. 邱駿彥,李政儒(2014).各國工時制度暨相關配套措施之比較研究.臺北:勞動部勞動及職業安全衛生研究所.
  9. 香港勞工處(2012).準工時政策研究報告.香港:香港勞工處.
  10. 勞動基準法,全國法規資料庫。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=N0030001
  11. 曾仁凱:主管納責任制林伯豐肯定。經濟日報:2019-05-03 23:22 臺北報導。
  12. 劉士豪(2016)。,臺北:勞動部。