题名

探討失效機率模型對風險基準檢查結果的影響

并列篇名

Investigating the Impact of Failure Probability Models on Risk-Based Inspection Outcomes

作者

陸彥儒(Yen-Ju Lu);王振華(Chen-Hua Wang)

关键词

風險基準檢查 ; 失效機率分析 ; 安全關鍵設備 ; 重大事故危害 ; Risk-based inspection (RBI) ; Failure probability analysis ; Safety critical equipment ; Major accident hazard

期刊名称

勞動及職業安全衛生研究季刊

卷期/出版年月

31卷3期(2023 / 09 / 20)

页次

21 - 31

内容语文

繁體中文;英文

中文摘要

風險基準檢查(Risk Based Inspection, RBI)技術已被廣泛使用於石化與化工業之固定設備的洩漏風險評估與檢查計畫制定。同時,該方法的分析結果可做為安全關鍵設備鑑別、安全關鍵任務制定之基礎。因此,方法本身的準確性影響重大事故危害(Major Accident Hazaed, MAH)的風險控制有效程度。儘管已有許多文獻探討RBI,但RBI分析中,有關失效機率的評估部份仍無法完全反應設備的真實狀況。本文為先期研究,目的是回顧RBI的執行過程及細部分析方法中,可能造成失效分析有保守之虞的狀況,並參考相關文獻研擬出實務上的可行解決方案,提供業者參考。

英文摘要

The technology of Risk Based Inspection (RBI) has been widely adopted for the assessment of leakage risks and the formulation of inspection plans for fixed equipment in the petrochemical and chemical industries. Concurrently, the analytical results of this method have been utilized as the foundation for the identification of safety critical equipment and the establishment of safety critical tasks. Consequently, the intrinsic accuracy of the approach has been critical in influencing the efficacy of Major Accident Hazard (MAH) risk management. Despite the abundance of literature discussing RBI, the segment of the RBI analysis concerning failure probability evaluations has not completely captured the real state of the equipment. This article represents a preliminary investigation, aiming to retrospectively analyze the implementation process of RBI and pinpoint situations within the detailed analysis methods that might engender unduly conservative failure assessments. Practical solutions, informed by related literature, have been formulated for industry reference.

主题分类 醫藥衛生 > 預防保健與衛生學
醫藥衛生 > 社會醫學
工程學 > 市政與環境工程
参考文献
  1. BS EN. BS EN 16991. Risk-based inspection framework, European Standard; 2018.
  2. GIS Geography. Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW) Interpolation. (Available from: URL: https://gisgeography.com/inverse-distance-weighting-idw-interpolation/ ; 2023.)
  3. Ablitt, C.,Speck, J.(2005).Experiences in implementing risk-based inspection.3rd MENDT-Middle East Nondesctructive Testing Conference
  4. Agistina, A.,Budiasih, E.,Pramoso, A.(2021).Determination of risk level, remaining life prediction, and risk based inspection planning based on API 581.IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering,1034(1)
  5. Ali, A.,Sabry, H.(2019).Implementing a successful risk based inspection program.Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition & Conference
  6. BSI. BS 7910, Guide to methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structures; 2019.
  7. Chang, M. K.,Chang, R. R.,Shu, C. M.,Lin, K. N.(2005).Application of risk based inspection in refinery and processing piping.Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,18(4-6)
  8. Crawl, D. A.,Louvar, J. F.(1990).Chemical process safety fundamentals with application.New Jersey:Prentice.
  9. DNV(2021).DNV.DNV-RP-G101 Risk based inspection of offshore topsides static mechanical equipment; 2021..
  10. Faber, M. H.(2002).Risk-based inspection: the framework.Structural engineering international,12(3)
  11. Freeman, R. A.(1990).CCPS guidelines for chemical process quantitative risk analysis.Plant/Operations Progress,9(4)
  12. Helle, H. P.,BV, C. N.(2012).Five fatal flaws in API RP 581.NACE 13th Middle East Corrosion Conference,Bahrain:
  13. Hurd, C.,Nunez, J.,Sapienza, F.(2018).Risk Based Inspection Utilizing Monte Carlo Simulation.CORROSION 2018
  14. International Association of Oil & Gas Producers. Safety performance indicators - Process safety events - 2020 data; 2020.
  15. Kamsu-Foguem, B.(2016).Information structuring and risk-based inspection for the marine oil pipelines.Applied Ocean Research,56
  16. Lee, H. C.,Cho, J. H.,Kwon, H. M.,Ham, B. H.,Char, S. C.,Kim, I. T.,Kim, T. O.(2007).Introduction of Risk Based Inspection System Suitable for Domestic Circumstances.Proceedings of the Safety Management and Science Conference
  17. Lee, S. M.,Park, S. H.,Chang, Y. S.,Choi, J. B.,Kim, Y. J.,Yoon, K. B.,Kim, J. Y.(2005).Development of risk-based inspection software for petrochemical plant.ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference
  18. Mohamed, R.,Che Hassan, C. R.,Hamid, M. D.(2019).Critical success factors of risk‐based inspection.Process Safety Progress,38(1)
  19. Mokhtar, A. A.,Che Ismail, M.,Muhammad, M.,Hussin, H.(2012).Assessing Piping Failure Probability subject to Corrosion under Insulation using Markov Model.2012 The 3rd International Conference on Production, Energy and Reliability (ICPER)
  20. Mokhtar, A. A.,CheIsmail, M. C.,Muhammad, M.(2009).Comparative study between degradation analysis and first order reliability method for assessing piping reliability for risk-based inspection.Studies,4
  21. Palazzi, E.,Currò, F.,Fabiano, B(2015).A critical approach to safety equipment and emergency time evaluation based on actual information from the Bhopal gas tragedy.Process safety and environmental protection,97
  22. Paleh, J. H.,Haga, R. A.,Favarò, F. M.,Bakolas, E.(2014).Texas City refinery accident: Case study in breakdown of defense-in-depth and violation of the safety–diagnosability principle in design.Engineering Failure Analysis,36
  23. Perumal, K. E.(2014).Corrosion risk analysis, risk based inspection and a case study concerning a condensate pipeline.Procedia Engineering,86
  24. Rachman, A.,Ratnayake, R. C.(2019).Machine learning approach for risk-based inspection screening asse.Reliability Engineering & System Safety,185
  25. Ramuna, Mohamed,Che Hassan, Che Rosmani,Diana, Mahar(2018).Hamid Implementing risk-based inspection approach: Is it beneficial for pressure equipment in Malaysia industries?.Process Safety Progress,37(2)
  26. Reynolds, J. T.(1996).The application of risk-based inspection methodology in the petroleum and petrochemical industry (No. CONF-960706-).New York:American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
  27. Reynolds, J. T.(2000).Risk Based Inspection-Where Are We Today?.CORROSION 2000
  28. Sanders, J. D.(2002).Effectively Using Risk-Based Inspection Results to Implement a Corrosion Under Insulation Program.Engineering Technology Conference on Energy 2002
  29. Shishesaz, M. R.,Bajestani, M. N.,Hashemi, S. J.,Shekari, E.(2013).Comparison of API 510 pressure vessels inspection planning with API 581 risk-based inspection planning approaches.International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping,111
  30. Shuai, J.,Han, K.,Xu, X.(2012).Risk-based inspection for large-scale crude oil tanks.Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,25(1)
  31. Siswantoro, N.,Priyanta, D.,Ramadhan, J.,Zaman, M. B.(2021).Implementation of Risk-Based Inspection (RBI) in Condensate Separator and Storage Vessel: A Case Study.International Journal of Marine Engineering Innovation and Research,6(1)
  32. Sklet, S.(2006).Safety barriers: Definition, classification, and performance.Journal of loss prevention in the process industries,19(5)
  33. Straub, D.,Faber, M. H.(2005).Risk based inspection planning for structural systems.Structural safety,27(4)
  34. The American petroleum institute(2021).API RP 754 Process Safety Performance Indicators for the Refining and Petrochemical Industries.
  35. The American petroleum institute(2016).Risk-Based Inspection Methodology.
  36. The American petroleum institute(2021).The American petroleum institute. API 579-1 / ASME FFS-1, Fitness-For-Service, 2021..
  37. The American petroleum institute(1996).The American petroleum institute. API Publication 581 Risk-Based Inspection Base Resource Document; 1996..
  38. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers(2018).Managing System Integrity of Gas Pipelines.
  39. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers(2021).ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section II: Materials - Part D: Properties (Customary).
  40. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers(2018).ASME PCC-3 Inspection Planning Using Risk-Based Methods.
  41. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers(2007).Inspection Planning Using Risk-Based Methods, ASME PCC-3.
  42. The center of chemical process safety(2016).Guidelines for Asset Integrity Management.
  43. The center of chemical process safety(2018).Dealing with Aging Process Facilities and Infrastructure.
  44. Tien, S. W.,Hwang, W. T.,Tsai, C. H.(2006).Research on Risk-Based Piping Inspection Guideline System in the Petrochemical Industry.International Journal of Quality Innovation,7(2)
  45. Vinod, G.,Sharma, P. K.,Santosh, T. V.,Prasad, M. H.,Vaze, K. K.(2014).New approach for risk based inspection of H2S based process plants.Annals of Nuclear Energy,66
  46. WRC(2014).Improvements in the Thinning Damage Factor Calculation Planned for the 3rd Edition of API RP 581.
  47. 張明(2009).结构可靠度分析:方法与程序.
  48. 陸彥儒,王振華(2017)。從可靠度觀點探討含缺陷承壓設備負載調降之安全性。中華環安衛研討會