题名

CLIL Lesson Planning and Material Development in an English Wonderland

DOI

10.6294/EaGLE.201712_3(2).0003

作者

Chin-Wen Chien

关键词

Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) ； English Wonderland ； native English-speaking teachers (NESTs) ； non-native English speaking teachers (NNESTs)

期刊名称

English as a Global Language Education (EaGLE) Journal

卷期/出版年月

3卷2期（2017 / 12 / 01）

页次

45 - 82

内容语文

英文
中文摘要

Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) has been practiced in Harriet's English Wonderland (pseudonym) in Taiwan. This study explored four NESTs (native English-speaking teachers) and one NNEST (non-native English speaking teacher) in terms of collaboration and identity negotiation on lesson planning and material development for CLIL lessons. The data in this case study included lesson plans, interviews, and observation field notes. This study developed two major findings. First, the CLIL, lessons featured language skills grammar, vocabulary, and functions integrated into subject content areas (e.g., science and social science) with the outputs focused on hands-on activities, word and grammatical exercises, and recaps. Secondly, the NEST and the NNEST identities were shaped through the negotiation of topics, sources, and activity designs for both the input and output of CLIL lessons.
主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. Education Bureau of New Taipei City Government (2017). Plan on summer camps in English Wonderland. Retrieved from http://www.ntpc.edu.tw/content/?parent_id=10174&type_id=10174
  2. (2009).CLIL Practice: Perspectives from the Field.
  3. Aiello, J.,Di Martino, E.,Di Sabato, B.(2017).Preparing teachers in Italy for CLIL: Reflections on assessment, language proficiency and willingness to communicate.International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism,20(1),69-83.
  4. Albakri, R. H.(2013).Teaching scientific vocabulary to EFL learners using English: content and language integrated learning.Arab World English Journal,4(1),269-284.
  5. Alexandrou, A.,Swaffield, S.(2012).Teacher leadership and professional development: Perspectives, connections and prospects.Professional Development in Education,38(2),159-167.
  6. Andrews, S. J.(2001).The language awareness of the L2 teacher: Its impact upon pedagogical practice.Language Awareness,10(2&3),75-90.
  7. Baecher, L.,Farnsworth, T.,Ediger, A.(2014).The challenges of planning language objectives in content-based ESL instruction.Language Teaching Research,18(1),118-136.
  8. Banegas, D. L.(2015).Sharing views of CLIL lesson planning in language teacher education.Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning,8(2),104-130.
  9. Banegas, D. L.(2012).Motivation and autonomy through CLIL. A collaborative undertaking.Views on motivation and autonomy in ELT: Selected papers from the XXXVII FAAPI Conference,San Martín de los Andes:
  10. Banegas, D. L.(2012).CLIL teacher development: Challenges and experiences.Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning,5(1),46-56.
  11. Banegas, D.,Pavese, A.,Velázquez, A.,Vélez, S. M.(2013).Teacher professional development through collaborative action research: Impact on foreign English-language teaching and learning.Educational Action Research,21(2),185-201.
  12. Beijaard, D.,Meijer, P. C.,Verloop, N.(2004).Reconsidering research on teachers' professional identity.Teaching and Teacher Education,20(1),107-128.
  13. Bowman, R. F.(2004).Teachers as leaders.The Clearing House,77(5),187-89.
  14. Braun, V.,Clarke, V.(2006).Using thematic analysis in psychology.Qualitative Research in Psychology,3(2),77-101.
  15. Brüning, C. I.,Purrmann, M. S.(2014).CLIL pedagogy in Europe: CLIL teacher education in Germany.Utrecht Studies in Language and Communication,27,315-338.
  16. Cammarata, L.(2009).Negotiating curricular transitions: Foreign language teachers' learning experience with content-based instruction.Canadian Modern Language Review,65(4),559-585.
  17. Cammarata, L.,Tedick, D. J.(2012).Balancing content and language in instruction: The experience of immersion teachers.The Modern Language Journal,96(2),251-269.
  18. Castro, M. A. B.,Nieto, M. A.(2007).Teaching science in CLIL: A sample lesson plan for the non-linguistic areas.Theory Behind the Practice
  19. Chien, C. W.(2017).NESTs' identities in activity designs for intensive English camps at English Wonderland.Pedagogy, Culture and Society,1-16.
  20. Choudhury, A. S.(2010).Teaching vocabulary in the ESL/EFL classroom: Central pedagogical issues.Modern Journal of Applied Linguistics,2(1),306-316.
  21. Coyle, D.,Holmes, B.,King, L.(2009).Towards an integrated curriculum-CLIL National statement and guidelines.London, UK:The Languages Company.
  22. Coyle, D.,Hood, P.,Marsh, D.(2010).CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
  23. Danielson, C.(2007).The many faces of leadership.Educational Leadership,65(1),14-19.
  24. De Graaff, R.,Koopman, G. J.,Westhoff, G.(2007).Identifying effective L2 pedagogy in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL).Vienna English Working Papers,16(3),12-19.
  25. Evnitskaya, N.,Morton, T.(2011).Knowledge construction, meaning-making and interaction in CLIL science classroom communities of practice.Language and Education,25(2),109-127.
  26. Floimayr, T.(2010).CLIL in biology - an evaluation of existing teaching materials for Austrian schools.Current Research CLIL,3,21-28.
  27. García, S.(2013).Three frameworks for developing CLIL materials.Encuentro,22,49-53.
  28. Gefaell, C.,Unterberger, B.(2010).CLIL programme evaluation: Deriving implementation guidelines from stakeholder perspectives.Current Research CLIL,3,29-35.
  29. Gierlinger, E.(2015).'You can speak German, sir': On the complexity of teachers' L1 use in CLIL.Language and Education,29(4),347-368.
  30. Griva, E.,Chostelidou, D.,Panteli, P.(2014).Ιnsider views of CLIL in primary education.International Journal for Innovation Education and Research,2(8),31-53.
  31. Gustafsson, M.,Eriksson, A.,Räisänen, C.,Stenberg, A. C.,Jacobs, C.,Wright, J.,Winberg, C.(2015).Collaborating for Content and Language Integrated Learning: The situated character of faculty collaboration and student learning.Across the Disciplines,8,1-8.
  32. Harrison, C.,Killion, J.(2007).Ten roles for teacher leaders.Teachers as Leaders,65(1),74-77.
  33. Harrop, E.(2012).Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL): Limitations and possibilities.Encuentro,21,57-70.
  34. Heffernan, N.(2005).Leadership in EFL: Time for Change?.Asian EFL Journal,7(1),1-14.
  35. Hillyard, S.(2011).First steps in CLIL: Training the teachers.Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning,4(2),1-12.
  36. Ioannou-Georgiou, S.(Ed.),Pavlou, P.(Ed.)(2011).Guidelines for CLIL Implementation in Primary and Pre-primary Education.Brussels, Belgium:European Commission.
  37. Jäppinen, A.(2005).Thinking and content learning of mathematics and science as cognitional development in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL): Teaching through a foreign language in Finland.Language and Education,19(2),147-168.
  38. Juan, M.(2010).Oral fluency development in secondary education CLIL learners.Current Research CLIL,3,42-48.
  39. Kirpal, S.(2004).Researching work identities in a European context.Career Development International,9,199-221.
  40. Kohn, K.(2012).Pedagogic corpora for Content and Language Integrated Learning. Insights from the backbone project.The Eurocall Review,20(2),3-22.
  41. Kong, S.(2015).Designing Content‐Language Integrated Learning materials for late immersion students.TESOL Journal,6(2),302-331.
  42. Lindahl, K.,Baecher, L.,Tomaš, Z.(2013).Teacher language awareness in content-based activity design.Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education,1(2),198-225.
  43. Llinares, A.,Dalton-Puffer, C.(2015).The role of different tasks in CLIL students' use of evaluative language.System,54,69-79.
  44. Lyster, R.,Ballinger, S.(2011).Content-based language teaching: Convergent concerns across divergent contexts.Language Teaching Research,15(3),279-288.
  45. Malvezzi-Campeggi, F.(2013).Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL): State of the art in Europe and in Italy.Journal of Postdoctoral Research,1(6),38-44.
  46. Marsh, D.,Mehisto, P.,Wolff, D.,Frigols Martín, M. J.(2012).European framework for CLIL teacher education.Strasbourg Cedex, France:The European Centre for Modern Languages.
  47. McDougald, J.(2015).Teachers' attitudes, perceptions and experiences in CLIL: A look at content and language.Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal,17(1),25-41.
  48. Mehisto, P.(2012).Criteria for producing CLIL learning material.Encuentro,21,15-33.
  49. Mehisto, P.,Marsh, D.,Frigols, M.J.(2008).Uncovering CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning in bilingual education and multilingual education.Oxford, UK:Macmillan.
  50. Merriam, S. B.(2009).Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
  51. Milne, E. D.,Llinares, A.,Morton, T.(2010).CLIL across contexts: A scaffolding framework for CLIL teacher education.Current Research CLIL,3,12-20.
  52. Moate, J. M.(2011).The impact of foreign language mediated teaching on teachers' sense of professional integrity in the CLIL classroom.European Journal of Teacher Education,34(3),333-346.
  53. Mohan, B.(1986).Language and Content.Reading, MA:Addison-Wesley.
  54. Morgan, B.(2004).Teacher identity as pedagogy: Towards a field-internal conceptualization in bilingual and second language education.International Journal of Bilingual Education & Bilingualism,7(2&3),172-188.
  55. Nikula, T.(2012).On the role of peer discussions in the learning of subjectspecific language use in CLIL1.Discourse and Language Learning Across L2 Instructional Settings,24,133-153.
  56. Nikula, T.(2015).Hands-on tasks in CLIL science classrooms as sites for subject-specific language use and learning.System,54,14-27.
  57. Noor, K. B. M.(2008).Case study: A strategic research methodology.American Journal of Applied Sciences,5(11),1602-1604.
  58. Papaja, K.(2013).The role of a teacher in a CLIL classroom.Glottodidactica. An International Journal of Applied Linguistics,40(1),147-153.
  59. Pappa, S.,Moate, J.,Ruohotie-Lyhty, M.,Eteläpelto, A.(2017).Teacher agency within the Finnish CLIL context: Tensions and resources.International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism,1-21.
  60. Pappa, S.,Moate, J.,Ruohotie-Lyhty, M.,Eteläpelto, A.(2017).Teachers' pedagogical and relational identity negotiation in the Finnish CLIL context.Teaching and Teacher Education,65,61-70.
  61. Pavón Vázquez, V.,Ávila López, J.,Gallego Segador, A.,Espejo Mohedano, R.(2015).Strategic and organisational considerations in planning content and language integrated learning: A study on the coordination between content and language teachers.International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism,18(4),409-425.
  62. Pena Díaz, C.,Porto Requejo, M. D.(2008).Teacher beliefs in a CLIL education project.Porta Linguarum,10,151-161.
  63. Pokrivčáková, S.(Ed.)(2015).CLIL in Foreign Language Education.Nitra, Slovakia:Constantine the Philosopher University.
  64. Prochazkova, L. T.(2013).Mathematics for language, language for mathematics.European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,1(1),23-28.
  65. Richards, J. C.(2013).Curriculum approaches in language teaching: Forward, central, and backward design.RELC Journal,44(1),5-33.
  66. Ruohotie-Lyhty, M.(2013).Struggling for a professional identity: Two newly qualified language teachers' identity narratives during the first years at work.Teaching and Teacher Education,30,120-129.
  67. Urmeneta, C. E.(2013).Learning to become a CLIL teacher: Teaching, reflection and professional development.International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism,16(3),334-353.
  68. Vallbona, A.,Sarah, K.(2012).First steps towards CLIL: Perceptions and training at a Catalan university.TRICLIL proceedings: Better CLIL: More Opportunities in Primary, Secondary and Higher education,Bellaterra, Catalunya:
  69. Varghese, M.,Morgan, B.,Johnston, J.,Johnson, K.(2005).Theorizing language teacher identity: Three perspectives and beyond.Journal of Language, Identity, and Education,4(1),21-44.
  70. Warren, L. L.(2000).Teacher planning: A literature review.Educational Research Quarterly,24,37-42.
  71. Wolff, D.(2012).The European framework for CLIL teacher education.Synergies Italie,8,105-116.
  72. Xanthou, M.(2011).The impact of CLIL on L2 vocabulary development and content knowledge.English Teaching,10(4),116-126.
  73. Yin, R. K.(2008).Case study research: Design and methods.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
print cancel