人權與記憶的角力：被遺忘權的核心理念及其對檔案事業之衝擊與影響

The Human Rights Locked Horns with Memory: The Concern and Influence of the Right to Be Forgotten for Archives Work

10.6575/JILA.2017.90.02

吳宇凡(Yu-Fan Wu)

被遺忘權 ； 檔案館 ； 檔案典藏單位 ； Right to be forgotten ； Archives ； Archival institutions

圖資與檔案學刊

90期（2017 / 06 / 15）

15 - 31

繁體中文

2014 年歐洲法院裁定當個人資料顯然已過時且不相關時，即使所刪除資訊在過去係屬合法公開，民眾仍有權要求網路業者刪除個人相關資訊之連結，這樣的權利稱之為被遺忘權。此權利的提出刺激相關單位及人員重新檢視自身業務及其所提供資料內容，而歷史文獻資料內容因涉及大量曾經合法公開之個人資訊，因此相關議題亦為記憶保存單位所爭議。為此，本文即聚焦於被遺忘權對於檔案典藏單位之影響，釐清被遺忘權之定義與範疇，以及國外檔案典藏單位對於是項議題之意見進行整理，不僅可作為檔案典藏相關單位參考，更可作為其他文化典藏單位在處理相關事宜時之借鑑。

In 2014 the EU put forward the concept of the right to be forgotten, and there is a great deal of general literature on exercise of the right. There is little specific guidance, however, for the impact of the right to be forgotten on memory-preserving institutions. By analyzing the literature of foreign archival institutions on the subject of the right to be forgotten, this paper clarifies the definition and scope of the right, and argues that the experience of the archival institutions in Taiwan and other foreign countries can provide a framework for the impact of the right to be forgotten on archival institutions.

1. 獨立媒體（2014 年11 月25 日）。擱置在香港引入「被遺忘權」。檢自https://inmediahk.org/2014/11/25/%E6%93%B1%E7%BD%AE%E5%9C%A8%E9%A6%99%E6%B8%AF%E5%BC%95%E5%85%A5%E3%80%8C%E8%A2%AB%E9%81%BA%E5%BF%98%E6%AC%8A%E3%80%8D/
2. 薛理桂（2016 年8 月2 日）。國史館開倒車。中時電子報。檢自http://opinion.chinatimes.com/20160802006527-262105
3. 鄭鴻達（2017 年2 月26 日）。228 檔案難調閱 陳儀深：應立法排除障礙。自由時報。檢自http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/focus/paper/1081414
4. Jarvis, J. (2014, May 30). The right to remember, damnit. Retrieved from http://buzzmachine.com/2014/05/30/right-remember-damnit/
5. Google Transparency Report (2017). Search removals under European privacy law. Retrieved from https://www.google.com/transparencyreport/removals/europeprivacy/?hl=zh-TW
6. Zittrain, J. (2014, May 14). Don't force Google to forget. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/15/opinion/dont-force-google-to-forget.html
7. Beckles, C. (2013). Will the right to be forgotten lead to a society that was forgotten? Retrieved from https://iapp.org/news/a/will-the-right-to-be-forgotten-lead-to-a-society-that-was-forgotten
8. 智由博集（2016 年7 月24 日）。被遺忘權在台灣是否能主張，待定！科技新報。檢自http://technews.tw/2016/07/24/right-to-be-forgotten-google-taiwan/
9. Ireland Archives and Records Association (2014, March 20). Annual general meeting. Retrieved from http://www.learnaboutarchives.ie/~learnabo/images/documents/ARA%20I%202015%20AGM/ARA_I_AGM_MINS_20_3_2014.pdf
10. Yau, C. (2014, June 16). Hong Kong to lobby Google over the 'right to be forgotten'. South China Morning Post. Retrieved from http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/article/1533618/privacy-chief-allan-chiang-wants-right-be-forgotten-extended-asia?page=all
11. European Commission (2011). European Commission consultation on the Commission's comprehensive approach on data protection in the European Union (COM (2010) 609 final) - Response from The National Archives of England, Wales and the United Kingdom. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/justice/news/consulting_public/0006/contributions/public_authorities/natarchives_uk_en.pdf
12. Sørensen, J. D. (2008). The conflict between data protection and archiving. Retrieved from http://dlmforum.typepad.com/Slovenia_Sorensen.pdf
13. Turnbull, M. (2014, June 2). National Archives Conference Address - Open for business in the digital economy. Retrieved from http://www.malcolmturnbull.com.au/media/national-archives-conference-address-open-for-businessin-the-digital-econo
14. European Commission (n.d.). Factsheet on the “Right to be Forgotten” ruling (C-131/12). Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/justice/data-protection/files/factsheets/factsheet_data_protection_en.pdf
15. European Commission (2013, April 3). Minutes – Joint meeting of the EAG with EBNA in Dublin, Ireland–3 April 2013. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/archival-policy/docs/eag/cr/130403_minutes_en.pdf
16. 曾韋禎、湯佳玲（2012 年9 月30 日）。個資法明起上路 戰後史料限縮 學界恐慌。自由時報。檢自http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/focus/paper/619066
17. 楊政郡（2015 年11 月18 日）。個資保護過頭 法界一片痛罵聲。自由時報。檢自http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/society/paper/933236
18. Article 19(2016).The "Right to be Forgotten": Remembering freedom of expression..
19. Hoskins, A.(ed.)(2014).The Ethics of Memory in a Digital Age.London:Palgrave Macmillan.
20. Kelly, M. J.,Satola, D.(2017).The right to be forgotten.University of Illinois Law Review,1,1-64.
21. 王利明(2015)。法治：良法與善治。北京:北京大學出版社。
22. 許雪姬(2014)。口述史的回顧與展望：解嚴後臺灣口述歷史的發展及其檢討，1987-2014。臺灣口述歷史學會會刊，5，2-38。
23. 楊智傑(2015)。個人資料保護法制上「被遺忘權利」與「個人反對權」：從2014 年西班牙Google V. AEPD案判決出發。國會月刊，43(7)，19-43。

1. (2020)。個人隱私保護法規對於檔案開放應用實務之影響。圖書資訊學研究，15(1)，1-33。
2. (2024)。淺析網路APP會員之數位隱私權保護─從全聯PXPay結合全支付電子支付談起。藝術學報，114，73-95。