大學資訊素養線上課程教學模式與策略研究

Study on Instructional Models and Strategies of Information Literacy Online Courses for Higher Education

10.6575/JILA.2017.91.02

王梅玲(Mei-Ling Wang)

資訊素養 ； 資訊素養教學 ； 線上課程 ； 數位學習 ； Information literacy ； Information literacy instruction ； Online courses ； E-learning

圖資與檔案學刊

91期（2017 / 12 / 15）

20 - 46

繁體中文

資訊素養對於高等教育很重要，為培養大學生成為批判性思考、獨立學習與終身學習者，英美各國普遍推動大學資訊素養教育。數位學習與線上教育近年風行，成為新的教育與學習方式。資訊素養線上教學開始興起，但不同於傳統教室教學，教師與學生不在一起，線上教育如何使學生主動學習與獲得良好學習互動，均遭遇問題與挑戰。本研究主要探討大學資訊素養線上教學模式與策略，採用文獻探討與個案研究方法，首先陳述大學資訊素養教學的意涵，析述資訊素養線上教育的特點與問題，藉由文獻探討歸納大學資訊素養線上課程類型、課程傳遞方式、教學法與教學策略。最後以個案研究，分析資訊素養自學網、資訊素養數位教材、資訊素養線上課程、資訊素養磨課師四類五個線上課程，以及實證探討線上教學模式與策略，最後提出結論與建議。

Information literacy is important for higher education to cultivate undergraduates to be critical thinking, independent and lifelong learners. Therefore, information literacy instruction is popular among universities in the United States and the United Kingdom. The popularity of digital learning and online courses has been welcomed in the recent years as a new way of education and learning. Information literacy online instruction has started to develop in the recent years; however, unlike the traditional classroom teaching, teachers and students are not in the same place. How online education can make students actively learn and lead to good learning interaction is problematic and challenging. The article mainly discusses the instruction models and strategies on information literacy online courses for higher education with research methods of literature review and case study. Firstly, it explores the meaning of information literacy instruction, and then analyzes the characteristics and problems of information literacy online instruction. Through literature review, it summarizes the types of information literacy online courses, course delivery methods, pedagogies and teaching strategies. The article analyzes five cases of information literacy online courses with case study methods including an information literacy online tutorial, an information literacy digital object website, an information literacy online course and two information literacy MOOCs. This case study empirically explores information literacy online courses, instruction, learner interaction and assessment. Finally, conclusions and suggestions are proposed.

1. 王梅玲(2013)。數位課程教學法模式與應用：知識組織與資訊取用課程實例探討。大學圖書館，17(1)，1-21。
   連結：
2. 林菁(2008)。資訊素養融入大學生主題探究之研究。教育資料與圖書館學，46(2)，233-266。
   連結：
3. SCONUL Working Group on Information Literacy (2011). The SCONUL seven pillars of information literacy: Core model for higher education. Retrieved from http://www.sconul.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/coremodel.pdf
4. University of Leeds (2017). Learning online: Searching and researching. Retrieved from https://www.futurelearn.com/courses/searching-and-researching
5. American Library Association (1989). Presidential committee on information literacy: Final report. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/acrl/publications/whitepapers/presidential
6. Association of College and Research Libraries (2000). Information literacy competency standards for higher education. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11213/7668
7. 教育部（2017）。教育部大學通識圖書資訊應用。檢自http://mediahive.lib.ntu.edu.tw/website/LIS/home.html
8. Open University (2017). FutureLearn. Retrieved from https://www.futurelearn.com/
9. Association of College and Research Libraries (2015). Framework for information literacy for higher education. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework
10. Calhoun Community College (2017). TILT - The Information Literacy Tutorial. Retrieved from http://lib.calhoun.edu/lib/newTILT/
11. 張簡誌誠（2013 年9 月）。逢甲大學圖書館如何推動資訊素養研習活動概況介紹。在吳美美主持，圖書館推動資訊素養教育之經驗分享系列座談會─「大專校院組」。中華民國圖書館學會資訊素養委員會、中華民國圖書館學會學會會員發展委員會、國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所主辦，臺北市。
12. 國立交通大學（2017）。資訊力與資訊搜尋磨課師。檢自交通大學ewant 育望開放教育平台http://www.ewant.org/admin/tool/mooccourse/mnetcourseinfo.php?hostid=4&id=801
13. eConcordia.com Inc. (2017). eConcordia. Retrieved from https://www.econcordia.com/home/
14. 國立政治大學（2017）。政治大學磨課師課程：資訊力與資訊搜尋。檢自http://moocs.nccu.edu.tw/course/94/intro
15. American Library Association(2012).The 2012 state of America's libraries report.american libraries,special issue
16. Bartoletti, R.,Restine, K.(2012).Promising practices in online teaching and learning.
17. Courtney, K. K.(2015).MOOCs and libraries.Lanham, MD:Rowman & Littlefield.
18. Cox, C. N.(Ed.),Lindsay, E. B.(Ed.)(2008).Information Literacy Instruction Handbook.Chicago, IL:Association of College and Research Libraries.
19. Dabbagh, N.(2005).Pedagogical models for e-learning: A theory-based design framework.International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning,1(1),25-44.
20. Dewald, N.,Scholz-Crane, A.,Booth, A.,Levine, C.(2000).Information literacy at a distance: Instructional design issues.Journal of Academic Librarianship,26(1),33-44.
21. Eisenberg, M. B.,Lowe, C. A.,Spitzer, K. L.(2004).Information literacy: Essential skills for the information age.Westport, CT:Libraries Unlimited.
22. Grant, M. M.(2002).Getting a grip on project-based learning: Theory, cases and recommendations.Meridian: A Middle School Computer Technologies Journal,5(1),1-3.
23. Grover, S.,Franz, P.,Schneider, E.,Roy, P.(2013).The MOOCs as distributed intelligence: Dimensions of a framework & evaluation of MOOCs.To see the world and a grain of sand: Learning across levels of space, time, and scale: CSCL 2013 conference proceedings
24. Harasim, L. M.(2012).Learning theory and online technologies.New York, NY:Routledge.
25. Kaplowitz, J. R.(2012).Transforming information literacy instruction using learner-centered teaching.London, England:Facet Publishing.
26. Mackey, T. P.(Ed.),Jacobson, T. E.(Ed.)(2011).Teaching information literacy online.New York, NY:Neal-Schuman.
27. Middle States Commission on Higher Education(2003).Developing research & communication skills: Guidelines for information literacy in the curriculum.Philadelphia, PA:Middle States Commission on Higher Education.
28. Wade, A.,Locke, J.,Devey, P.(2012).An online information literacy course for undergraduates: Early experiences.Paper session presented at the World Library and Information Congress 2012, 78th IFLA General Conference and Assembly
29. 王梅玲(2004)。大學生資訊素養課程設計與評鑑。圖書館學與資訊科學，30(2)，134-142。
30. 王梅玲、陳佩妤(2014)。從資訊素養指標探討大學生課業學習與日常生活資訊使用習性：以政治大學為例。王振鵠教授九秩榮慶論文集，台北:
31. 張春興(1994)。教育心理學：三化取向的理論與實踐。台北:東華書局。
32. 陳年興、楊錦潭(2006)。數位學習：理論與實務。臺北縣:博碩文化。
33. 陳志銘(2009)。創新數位學習模式與教學應用。臺北市:文華圖書。
34. 黃如花、李白楊(2015)。MOOC 背景下信息素養教育的變革。圖書情報知識，4，14-25。
35. 劉怡甫(2013)。與全球十萬人作同學：談MOOCs 現況及其發展。評鑑雙月刊，42
36. 顏春煌(2010)。數位學習：觀念、方法、實務、設計與實作。臺北市:碁?資訊。

1. Chu-Ling Chang(2023)。Implementation Effectiveness of an Applied Programing Course for Non-Information Science Students: A Taiwanese University's Case Study。弘光學報，91，45-58。
2. 游婉琳(2022)。大學通識教師於疫情前後使用數位學習平台之教學改變與資訊素養能力之探究。通識教育學刊，30，33-67。
3. 袁宇熙,胡宜蓁(2019)。以科技導向數位學習培育大學生餐飲業創業素養之研究。當代教育研究季刊，27(4)，71-114。
4. 莊哲偉,王李中羿(2023)。大專桌球課程遠距教學滿意度調查。興大體育學刊，22，163-176。
5. (2024)。線上體育教學新模式－學校＋家庭社群學習模式。臺大體育學報，46，43-58。