開放取用在校園發展與實施初探：以美國加州大學系統、澳洲昆士蘭科技大學及加拿大卡加利大學為例

A Study of Open Access Development and Implementation in Campus: Taking University of California System, Queensland University of Technology and University of Calgary as Examples

10.6575/JILA.2017.91.05

李家寧(Chia-Ning Li)

開放取用 ； 案例探討 ； 美國加州大學系統 ； 澳洲昆士蘭科技大學 ； 加拿大卡加利大學 ； Open access ； Case studies ； University of California System ； Queensland University of Technology ； University of Calgary

圖資與檔案學刊

91期（2017 / 12 / 15）

97 - 116

繁體中文

本文透過分析美國加州大學系統、澳洲昆士蘭科技大學及加拿大卡加利大學在校園發展與實施OA的經驗，歸納出OA在校園發展與實施的重點，提供國內大專校院作為發展OA的參考：（1）機構宜擬定具有規範性的政策；（2）扣合其他政策，可使政策的執行臻至完整；（3）宜有基礎設備作為配套方案；（4）穩定的挹注補助經費以及（5）節省成本，提高發展OA的效益。

This study summarizes five key points of open access development and implementation on campus by analyzing the experience of University of California System, Queensland University of Technology and University of Calgary, which are provided as references for Taiwan universities and colleges to develop and implement OA on campus. The five key points are as follows: (1) the institution should formulate normative open access policy; (2) the formulated policy should coordinate with other national or funder’s open access policies to make policy implementation complete; (3) the institution should build infrastructure for carrying out the open access policy; (4) the institution should provide stable funding for developing and implementing open access; (5) the institution should save cost and enhance the effectiveness in developing open access.

1. 吳紹群、吳明德(2007)。開放資訊取用期刊對學術傳播系統之影響。圖書資訊學研究，2(1)，21-54。
   連結：
2. Library of University of California, Berkeley. (2017). Berkeley commits to accelerating universal open access, signs the OA2020 Expression of Interest. Retrieved from http://news.lib.berkeley.edu/2017/03/20/oa2020/?mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiTVRFME5qRmtPRE00TXpGaiIsInQiOiJqMlwvSWVPaFwvZVVSNU5tQ3lsczZGXC90Y0dXVTc0Ym9aeHVwUlBlczkxM2tzRVB3clVpa09YTXNMTUZVZUhlMFlKMWZ1c2dZSmtIRWtQNDNcL1dhNVwvcm1JM2xudVgyM1EwNGxSNVgxT0kycmcwbzdGeFlab1BXZ3QwQTR0NlRTTVZtIn0%3D
3. Ranking WEB of Repositories (2017). Australia. Retrieved from http://repositories.webometrics.info/en/Oceania/Australia
4. QUT ePrints. (n.d.a). Deposits. Retrieved from https://eprints.qut.edu.au/statistics/deposits_by_period? page=11
5. SPARC Europe (2016). The Open Access Citation Advantage Service (OACA). Retrieved from http://sparceurope.org/what-we-do/open-access/sparc-europe-open-access-resources/open-accesscitation-advantage-service-oaca/
6. Gargouri, Y., Lariviere, V., Gingras, Y., Brody, T., Carr, L., & Harnad, S. (2012). Testing the finch hypothesis on green OA mandate effectiveness. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1210.8174v1.pdf
7. QUT ePrints (n.d.b). Repository statistics. Retrieved from https://eprints.qut.edu.au/statistics/
8. Kingsley, D. (2013, October). Open access developments in Australia. Paper presented at the Open Access and Research Conference, Brisbane, Australia. Retrieved from https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/bitstream/1885/10793/2/Kingsley_OpenAccessAustralia2013Handouts.pdf
9. University of Calgary. (n.d.b). Open Access Authors Fund. Retrieved from http://library.ucalgary.ca/open-access-authors-fund
10. Mitchell, C. (2016). Does the UC open access policy miss the mark? Depends on which mark. Retrieved from Office of Scholarly Communication, University of California website: https://osc.universityofcalifornia.edu/2016/10/does-the-uc-open-access-policy-miss-the-markdepends-on-which-mark/index.html
11. University of Calgary. (n.d.a). Open access mandate. Retrieved from http://library.ucalgary.ca/oa-mandate
12. Basken, P. (2016). The U. of California's open-access promise hits a snag: The faculty. Retrieved from The Chronicle of Higher Education website http://www.chronicle.com/article/The-U-of-Californias/237044/?key=ful3ouD8IoXHYo2vGLU6ARHC-2kjrAo9exI3D1KP0hoQTd5d0VYdDdvcWtRbk8xSmpwRHY2UmtuSFNkWHlXNFkxSWdmQ1YyUmJB
13. AOASG (2015). Comparison of ARC & NHMRC policies. Retrieved from https://aoasg.org.au/resources/ comparison-of-arc-nhmrc-policies/
14. Adams, C. (2009). SPARC member spotlight: Testing the waters with open-access funds (University of California at Berkeley and the University of Calgary). Retrieved from SPARC website: http://sparc.arl.org/resource/sparc-member-spotlight-testing-waters-open-access-funds-universitycalifornia-berkeley-and
15. Harvard Library Office for Scholarly Communication (2008). Harvard Faculty of Arts and Sciences open access policy. Retrieved from https://osc.hul.harvard.edu/policies/fas/
16. Waller, A. (2009, May). One year (almost) with the Open Access Authors Fund. Paper presented at the University of Ottawa Training Week, Ottawa, Canada. Retrieved from http://eprints.rclis.org/13202/
17. 王怡惠（2015）。行政措施或立法推動﹖美國開放公部門資助研究成果之相關立法推動。Research Portal 科技政策觀點。檢自https://portal.stpi.narl.org.tw/index/article/10163
18. QUT Library (n.d.b). ARC and NHMRC open access mandate. Retrieved from https://www.library.qut.edu.au/research/publish_impact/openaccess/mandates.jsp
19. University of California. (n.d.). Publisher communications about the UC OA policies. Retrieved from Office of Scholarly Communication, University of California website: http://osc.universityofcalifornia.edu/open-access-policy/publisher-communications/index.html
20. Shieber, S., & Suber, P. (2015). Good practices for University open-access policies. Retrieved from https://cyber.harvard.edu/hoap/sites/hoap/images/Goodpracticesguide-2015.pdf
21. Sowa, J. (2016). Support for campus researchers strengthened by expansion of university's open access authors fund. UToday. Retrieved from https://www.ucalgary.ca/utoday/issue/2016-09-15/support-campus-researchers-strengthenedexpansion-universitys-open-access-authors
22. QUT Library (n.d.c). Copyright matters. QUT ePrints guides and FAQs. Retrieved from https://www.library.qut.edu.au/research/publish_impact/quteprints/faqs/#stats
23. Government of Canada (2016). Tri-Agency Open Access Policy on Publications. Retrieved from http://www.science.gc.ca/eic/site/063.nsf/eng/h_F6765465.html?OpenDocument
24. QUT Manual of Policies and Procedures (2016). F/1.3 QUT ePrints repository for research output. Manual of policies and procedures. Retrieved from http://www.mopp.qut.edu.au/F/F_01_03.jsp#F_01_03.02.mdoc
25. Research Consulting. (2014). Counting the cost of open access. Retrieved from http://www.researchconsulting.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Research-Consulting-Countingthe-Costs-of-OA-Final.pdf
26. QUT Library (n.d.a). Applying for APC support. Retrieved from https://www.library.qut.edu.au/research/publish_impact/openaccess/apcsupport.jsp
27. University of California, Academic Senate. (2013). Open access policy for the Academic Senate of the University of California. Retrieved from Office of Scholarly Communication, University of California website: http://osc.universityofcalifornia.edu/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/OpenAccess_adopted_072413.pdf
28. Shamash, K. (2016). Article processing charges (APCs) and subscriptions- Monitoring open access costs. Retrieved from Jisc website: https://www.jisc.ac.uk/sites/default/files/apc-and-subscriptions-report.pdf
29. Schiff, L. (2016). The UC publication management system: Fulfilling the promise of UC's open access policies. Retrieved from http://www.ucop.edu/information-technology-services/initiatives/sautter-award-program/sautter-2016/UCOP-UC-Publication-Management-System.pdf
30. University of California. (2015). UC Presidential open access policy. Retrieved from Office of Scholarly Communication, University of California website: http://osc.universityofcalifornia.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/UC-AP-15-0275_Open-Access.pdf
31. Bothwell, E. (2017). University of Calgary cancels journal subscriptions. Retrieved from The World University Rankings website: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/university-calgary-cancels-journalsubscriptions#survey-answer
32. Armbruster, C. (2010). Implementing open access: Policy case studies. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1685855
33. Kelty, C. M. (2012). An open access policy for the University of California. Retrieved from http://osc.universityofcalifornia.edu/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/UCLAOpen-Access-Presentation-July2012.pdf
34. Fortney, K., & Gonder, J. (2015). A social networking site is not an open access repository. Retrieved from Office of Scholarly Communication, University of California website: https://osc.universityofcalifornia.edu/2015/12/a-social-networking-site-is-not-an-open-accessrepository/
35. Björk, B.-C.(2017).Open access to scientific articles: A review of benefits and challenges.Internal and Emergency Medicine,12(2),247-253.
36. Bluh, P.(Ed.),Hepfer, C.(Ed.)(2013).The Institutional Repository: Benefits and Challenges.Chicago, IL:Association for Library Collections, Technical Services.
37. Cochrane, T. G.,Callan, P. A.(2007).Making a Difference: Implementing the eprints mandate at QUT.International Digital Library Perspectives,23(3),262-268.
38. Crow, R.(2002).The case for institutional repositories: a SPARC position paper.ARL Bimonthly Report,223
39. Houghton, J.,Swan, A.(2013).Planting the green seeds for a golden harvest: Comments and clarification on "going for gold".D-Lib Magazine,19(1/2)
40. Swan, A.(2012).Policy guidelines for the development and promotion of open access.
41. Teplitzky, S.,Phillips, M.(2016).Evaluating the impact of open access at Berkeley: Results from the 2015 survey of Berkeley Research Impact Imitative (BRII) funding recipients.College & Research Libraries,77(5),568-581.
42. Waller, A.(2013).A brief overview of open access activities at the University of Calgary.Canadian Research Knowledge Network (CRKN) Annual General Meeting,Toronto, Canada:
43. Yats, E.,Hampson, C.,Hatherill, J.,Lavigne, J.,Nariani, R.,Paterson, J.,Shires, M.,Tiessen, R.(2016).,未出版
44. Zhang, L.,Waston, E. M.(2017).Measuring the Impact of Gold and Green Open Access.The Journal of Academic Librarianship,43(4),337-345.
45. 劉聰德、張朝欽、梁晉嘉、謝青宏、任孝祥、林聖勇、林康藝、蔡愛玲(2010)。國家實驗研究院台灣科技資訊交流平台之部分研究報告成果國家實驗研究院台灣科技資訊交流平台之部分研究報告成果,台北市:財團法人國家實驗研究院科技政策研究與資訊中心。