吸引力要素與小說的組織與檢索

Appeal Factors and the Organization and Retrieval of Fictional Works

10.6575/JILA.201912_(95).0001

林奇秀(Chi-Shiou Lin)

吸引力要素 ； 愉悅閱讀 ； 小說檢索 ； 小說分類 ； 小說檢索系統 ； Appeal factor ； Pleasure reading ； Fiction retrieval ； Fiction classification ； Information retrieval systems for fiction

圖資與檔案學刊

95期（2019 / 12 / 15）

1 - 36

繁體中文;英文

吸引力要素係指閱讀素材中能反映讀者閱讀偏好，誘發閱讀快感的文本特徵，或讀者在閱讀中獲得的知性或感性閱聽效果。在英語世界中，已有若干資訊檢索服務以吸引力要素角度切入，提供讀者有別於傳統書名、作者、主題或文類的小說檢索點。本文從小說組織與檢索的問題開始，介紹吸引力要素的崛起背景，續介紹吸引力要素類型，依性質概可分為書籍相關與讀者導向兩大類，因前者反映文本特徵，較具相對客觀的可描述性，故系統所採用的吸引力要素多為前者。其後，本文介紹四個應用吸引力要素為檢索點的系統實例，並從文類理論觀點探討吸引力要素索引表的建構問題，最後，本文探討吸引力要素衍生的資訊檢索問題，包含吸引力要素索引詞彙的建構與索引一致性議題。

Appeal factors are the textual characteristics that may induce reading pleasures or the cognitive and affective effects a reader may experience from pleasure reading. Appeal factors are now used as access points in some information retrieval systems for fictional works in the English speaking world. This paper describes the organization and retrieval problems of fiction, which triggered the emergence of appeal-based indexing. It continues to discuss on the nature of reading appeals and the typology of appeal factors, including book-related and reader-driven appeals. It follows to describe four information systems where appeal factors are used as a search mechanism to filter and discover fiction titles that meet the readers' expectations. It goes on to theorize the relationships between appeal factors and literary genres and ends with a discussion on the challenges of appeal-based indexing, including the selection and construction of appeal terms as well as the indexing consistency issues.

1. 吳秋燕, Chiu-Yen,林奇秀, Chi-Shiou(2016)。推理小說的閱讀樂趣與讀者的選擇行為。教育資料與圖書館學，53(3)，361-388。
   連結：
2. 唐牧群, Muh-Chyun,吳宛青, Wan-Ching(2009)。由透鏡理論看大學圖書館讀者選書決策過程。圖書資訊學刊，7(1/2)，37-52。
   連結：
3. 陳書梅, Su-May Sheih,王佳琍, Chia-Li(2007)。美國公共圖書館施行讀者諮詢顧問服務之研究。圖書資訊學刊，5(1&2)，31-67。
   連結：
4. 陳書梅, Su-May Sheih,張淑華, Shu-Hua(2009)。公共圖書館小說讀者諮詢顧問服務需求之研究：以臺北都會區成人讀者爲例。教育資料與圖書館學，46(4)，546-575。
   連結：
5. NoveList. (2017b). NoveList contributors. Retrieved from https://www.ebscohost.com/novelist/aboutnovelist/novelist-contributors
6. NoveList. (2017c). The secret language of books: A guide to appeal (2018 ed.). Retrieved from https://www.ebscohost.com/uploads/novelist/pdf/NoveList_Appeal_2018.pdf
7. NoveList. (2018). NoveList staff. Retrieved from https://www.ebscohost.com/novelist/about-novelist/novelist-staff
8. NoveList. (2017a). Our product. Retrieved from https://www.ebscohost.com/novelist/our-products/novelistcomplete
9. AllReaders.com. (n.d.a). Gordonator Precision Search Engine (GPSE). Retrieved from http://allreaders.com/gordonator.asp
10. AllReaders.com. (n.d.b). AllReaders.com. Retrieved from http://allreaders.com/
11. Anonymous(2002).EBSCO publishing announces new database, NoveList upgrades.Information Today,19(5),36.
12. Berkenkotter, C,Huckin, T. N.(1995).Genre knowledge in genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition/culture/power.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Bowen, C. (2002, October 8). AllReaders.com Searches Book Plots, Characters [Web page]. Retrieved from http://www.editorandpublisher.com/news/allreaders-com-searches-book-plots-characters/
14. Breure, L.(2001).Development of the genre concept.Utrecht, Netherlands:Department of Information Science, University of Utrecht.
15. Cassell, K. A.(Ed.),Hiremath, U.(Ed.)(2006).Reference and information services in the 21st century: An introduction.New York, NY:Neal-Schuman Publishers.
16. Cassell, K. A.(Ed.),Hiremath, U.(Ed.)(2013).Reference and information services: An introduction.Chicago, IL:American Library Association.
17. Chan, L. M.(1989).Inter-indexer consistency in subject cataloging.Information Technology and Libraries,8(4),349-358.
18. Charles, J.,Linz, C.(2005).Romancing your readers: How public libraries can become more romancereader friendly.Public Libraries,44(1),43-48.
19. Clark, C.,Rumbold, K.(2006).Reading for pleasure: A research overview.London, UK:National Literacy Trust.
20. Cox, A. C.,Horne, K. L.(2012).Fast-paced, romantic, set in Savannah: A comparison of results from readers’ advisory databases in the public library.Library Quarterly,31(4),285-302.
21. Dali, K.(2013).Hearing stories, not keywords: Teaching contextual readers’ advisory.Reference Services Review,41(3),474-502.
22. Dali, K.(2014).From book appeal to reading appeal: Redefining the concept of appeal in readers’ advisory.The Library Quarterly,84(1),22-48.
23. David, C.,Giroux, L.,Bertrand-Gastaldy, S.,Lanteigne, D.(1995).Inedxing as problem solving: A cognitive approach to consistency.Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting,32,49-55.
24. EBSCO. (2017). NoveList. Retrieved from https://www.ebscohost.com/novelist
25. Fisher, K. E.(Ed.),Erdelez, S.(Ed.),McKechnie, L.(Ed.)(2005).Theories of information behavior.Medford, NJ:Information Today.
26. Fonseca, A. J.,Pulliam, J. M.(2002).Hooked on horror: A guide to reading interests in horror fiction.Westport, CT:Libraries Unlimited.
27. Freedman, A.(Ed.),Medway, P.(Ed.)(1994).Genre and the new rhetoric.Bristol, PA:Taylor & Francis.
28. Funk, M. E.,Reid, C. A.(1983).Indexing consistency in MEDLINE.Bulletin of the Medical Library Association,71(2),176-183.
29. Gannon, M. B.(2004).Blood, bedlam, bullets, and badguys: A reader’s guide to adventure/suspense fiction.Westport, CT:Libraries Unlimited.
30. Hotz-Davies, I.(Ed.),Kirchhofer, A.(Ed.),Leppänen, S.(Ed.)(2009).Internet Fictions.Newcastle upon Tyne, UK:Cambridge Scholars Press.
31. Hudson, W. H. (1910). An introduction to the study of literature. London, England: George G. Harrap.
32. Iser, W.(1978).The act of reading: A theory of aesthetic response.Baltimore, MD:Johns Hopkins University Press.
33. Jauss, H. R.(1982).Aesthetic experience and literary hermeneutics.Minneapolis, MN:University of Minnesota Press.
34. Jauss、 H. R.,顧建光（譯）, Jian-Guang,顧靜宇（譯）, Jing-Yu,張樂天（譯）, Le-Tian(1997).審美經驗與文學解釋學.上海=Shanghai:上海譯文=Shanghai Translation Publishing House.
35. Kieran, K. (1996). Reader’s robot. Retrieved from http://www.web4lib.org/archive/1996-April/004006.html
36. Leininger, K.(2000).Interindexer consistency in PsycINFO.Journal of Librarianship and Information Science,32(1),4-8.
37. Maker, R.(2008).Finding what you’re looking for: A reader-centred approach to the classification of adult fiction in public libraries.The Australian Library Journal,57(2),169-177.
38. Olson, H. A.,Wolfram, D.(2008).Syntagmatic relationships and indexing consistency on a larger scale.Journal of Documentation,64(4),602-615.
39. Opening the Book. (n.d.c). Whichbook. Retrieved from http://www.openingthebook.com/whichbook/
40. Opening the Book. (n.d.a). About Opening the Book. Retrieved from https://www.openingthebook.com/about
41. Opening the Book. (n.d.b). About. Retrieved from https://www.whichbook.net/about/
42. Pearl, N.(2002).Now read this II: A guide to mainstream fiction, 1990-2001.Englewood, CO:Libraries Unlimited.
43. Pearl, N.,Cords, S. S.(2010).Now read this III: A guide to mainstream fiction.Santa Barbara, CA:Libraries Unlimited.
44. Pejtersen, A. M.,Austin, J.(1983).Fiction retrieval: Experimental design and evaluation of a search system based on users’ value criteria (part 1).Journal of Documentation,39(4),230-246.
45. Pogorelec, A.(2004).Ljubljana,Faculty of Arts, University of Ljubljana.
46. Ranta, J. A.(1991).The new literary scholarship and a basis for increased subject catalog access to imaginative literature.Cataloging and Classification Quarterly,14(1),3-27.
47. Reich, P.,Biever, E. J.(1991).Indexing consistency: The input/output function of thesauri.College and Research Libraries,52(4),336-342.
48. Rogers, M.(1999).EBSCO acquires CARL’s NoveList.Library Journal,124(10),33-34.
49. Ross, C.(1999).Finding without seeking: The information encounter in the context of reading for pleasure.Information Processing and Management,35(6),783-799.
50. Saarti, J.(1999).Fiction indexing and the development of fiction thesauri.Journal of Librarianship and Information Science,31(2),85-92.
51. Saarti, J.(2002).Consistency of subject indexing of novels by public library professionals and patrons.Journal of Documentation,58(1),49-65.
52. Saricks, J. G.(2005).Readers’ advisory service in the public library.Chicago, IL:American Library Association.
53. Šauperl, A.(2013).Four views of a novel: Characteristics of novels as described by publishers, librarians, literary theorists, and readers.Cataloging and Classification Quarterly,51(6),624-654.
54. Shapiro, C.,Varian, H. R.(1998).Information rules: A strategic guide to the network economy.Boston, MA:Harvard Business Press.
55. Shearer, K. D.(Ed.)(1996).Guiding the reader to the next book.New York, NY:Neal-Schuman Publishers.
56. Sievert, M. C.,Andrews, M. J.(1991).Indexing consistency in Information Science Abstracts.Journal of the American Society for Information Science,42(1),1-6.
57. Spinuzzi, C.(2003).Tracing genres through organizations: A sociocultural approach to information design.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
58. Swales, J.(1990).Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings.Cambridge, England:Cambridge University Press.
59. Thompson Nicola Regional District Library System. (2011). Reader’s robot [Archived by Internet Wayback Machine]. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20110929155931/http://www.tnrdlib.bc.ca/rr.html
60. Vnuk, R.(2009).Read on-women’s fiction: Reading lists for every taste.Santa Barbara, CA:Libraries Unlimited.
61. Wyatt, N.(2007).An RA big think: The concept of appeal is on the table, and readers’ advisory librarians are revolutionizing it.Library Journal,132(12),40-43.
62. 朱立元（編）, Li-Yuan(2005).當代西方文藝理論.上海=Shanghai:華東師範大學出版社=East China Normal University Press.
63. 林奇秀, Chi-Shiou(2011)。腐女的閱讀逾越／愉悅感：BL（Boys’ Love）女性讀者閱讀經驗分析。2011台灣社會研究學會年會：碰撞‧新生：理論與實踐「踹共」，臺北市:
64. 陳錦惠, Jin-Huei(2013)。臺北市=Taipei，國立臺北教育大學課程與教學傳播科技研究所=National Taipei University of Education, Graduate School of Curriculum and Instructional Communications Technology。
65. 單德興, De-sing(1991)。試論小說評點與美學反應理論。中外文學，20(3)，73-101。