社會企業文獻計量統合分析與替代計量探索研究

The Meta-analysis of Bibliometrics Research and Exploration of Altmetrics for Social Enterprise Literatures

10.6575/JILA.201912_(95).0002

黃元鶴(Yuan-Ho Huang)

社會企業 ； 書目計量 ； 替代計量 ； Social entrepreneurship ； Social enterprise ； Biblometrics ； Altmetrics

圖資與檔案學刊

95期（2019 / 12 / 15）

37 - 77

繁體中文;英文

社會企業為一種結合營利與非營利型組織特點的新創事業，是商業管理學界與實務界近年重視的議題，教育、法律、政治、社會學等學科也受到社會企業學術文獻的影響。資訊計量方法為獲知學術研究傳播概況之分析工具之一，國外已有相關研究以資訊計量方法分析社會企業學術傳播現況，但目前研究都是由典型的索引摘要資料庫收集文獻分析。本研究採納替代性計量（Altmetrics）指標來探索新興學科之新媒體管道之傳播概況。分析808筆文件於不同類型之替代計量數據之可獲取資料的比例，探索社會企業研究文獻之Altmetric Badges與PlumX替代計量數據，比較替代計量數據與Web of Science引文資料庫之引文數，以及Google Scholar引文數的關連分析。

Social enterprise (social entrepreneurship) is a new field that combines non-profit with for-profit organizational features. It develops innovative methods and strategies to improve profit for the purpose of creating and maintaining social value. Social enterprise is not only important for scholarly and practical business management, but also has an impact on several disciplines, such as education, law, political science, sociology, etc. Informetrics is one kind of methods for exploring scholarly communications. Some researchers have applied informetrics to analysize social enterprise literatures; however, the sample data all comes from typical indexing and abstracting databases among existing studies. Webmetrics is one branch of informetrics, furthermore, altmetrics is hot topic in webmetrics. Because social enterprise is a new and developing discipline, there might be different results of the pattern of scholarly communications with typical bibliometrics and altmetrics. Therefore, this study applied altmetrics to explore the emerging discipline with analyzing 808 social enterprise literatures, including acquiring almetrics from Altmetric Badges and PlumX, and comparing altmetrics with citations from Web of Science database and Google Scholar.

1. 陳光華, kuang-hua,陳雅琦, ya-chi(2014)。探索人文社會學者研究產出之總合軌跡：以臺灣大學人文社會高等研究院為例。圖書資訊學刊，12(2)，81-116。
   連結：
2. 蔡明月, Ming-Yueh,曾苓莉, Ling-Li(2014)。網路計量學新指標Altmetrics。教育資料與圖書館學，51(特刊=special issue)，91-120。
   連結：
3. Borins, S.(2000).Loose cannons and rule breakers, or enterprising leaders? Some evidence about innovative public managers.Public Administration Review,60(6),498-507.
4. Bornmann, L.(2015).Alternative metrics in scientometrics: A meta-analysis of research into three altmetrics.Scientometrics,103(3),1123-1144.
5. Douglas, H.(2008).Creating knowledge: A review of research methods in three societal change approaches.Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing,20(2),141-163.
6. Goulding, A.(2013).The Big Society and English public libraries: where are we now?.New Library World,114(11/12),478-493.
7. Granados, M. L.,Hlupic, V.,Coakes, E.,Mohamed, S.(2011).Social enterprise and social entrepreneurship research and theory: A bibliometric analysis from 1991 to 2010.Social Enterprise Journal,7(3),198-218.
8. Harzing, A.W. (2007). Publish or Perish, available from https://harzing.com/resources/publish-or-perish
9. Haustein, S.,Peters, I.,Bar-Ilan, J.,Priem, J.,Shema, H.,Terliesner, J.(2014).Coverage and adoption of altmetrics sources in the bibliometric community.Scientometrics,101(2),1145-1163.
10. Hill, T. L.,Kothari, T. H.,Shea, M.(2010).Patterns of meaning in the social entrepreneurship literature: a research platform.Journal of social entrepreneurship,1(1),5-31.
11. Hoogendoorn, B.,Pennings, E.,Thurik, R.(2009).What Do We Know About Social Entrepreneurship: An Analysis of Empirical Research.International Review of Entrepreneurship,8(2),1-42.
12. Kong, E.(2010).Intellectual capital and non-profit organizations in the knowledge economy: editorial and introduction to special issue.Journal of Intellectual Capital,12(2),97-106.
13. Kraus, S.,Filser, M.,O’Dwyer, M.,Shaw, E.(2014).Social entrepreneurship: an exploratory citation analysis.Review of Managerial Science,8(2),275-292.
14. Li, X.,Thelwall, M.,Giustini, D.(2012).Validating online reference managers for scholarly impact measurement.Scientometrics,91(2),461-471.
15. Mair, J.,Martí, I.(2006).Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight.Journal of World Business,41(1),36-44.
16. Peredo, A. M.,McLean, M.(2006).Social entrepreneurship: A critical review of the concept.Journal of World Business,41(1),56-65.
17. Sassmannshausen, S. P.,Volkmann, C.(2013).A bibliometric based review on social entrepreneurship and its establishment as a field of research.Schumpeter Discussion Papers,2013-003
18. Short, J. C.,Moss, T. W.,Lumpkin, G. T.(2009).Research in social entrepreneurship: Past contributions and future opportunities.Strategic entrepreneurship journal,3(2),161-194.
19. Smedley, T. (2013). Are social enterprises the future for libraries? The Guardian, 2 April, available at: http://www.theguardian.com/social-enterprise-network/2013/apr/02/social-enterprises-libraries(accessed 5 Dec. 2015).
20. Sotudeh, H.,Mazarei, Z.,Mirzabeigi, M.(2015).CiteULike bookmarks are correlated to citations at journal and author levels in library and information science.Scientometrics,105(3),2237-2248.
21. Weerawardena, J.,Mort, G. S.(2006).Investigating social entrepreneurship: A multidimensional model.Journal of World Business,41(1),21-35.
22. Zhang, D. D.,Swanson, L. A.(2013).Social entrepreneurship in nonprofit organizations: An empirical investigation of the synergy between social and business objectives.Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing,25(1),105-125.
23. 陳亞寧, ya-ning(2013)。另一種指標Altmetrics & ALMs 簡介。「創新華文知識服務：中文學術電子資源的發展與應用」研習會，Taipei:

1. 蔡昕璋(2021)。臺灣學生事務研究之文獻計量分析：以《學生事務與輔導》論文為例。學生事務與輔導，59(4)，17-37。