莫拉克颱風災後十年之重建成果及省思（二）－彩虹永續家園建設

Reconstruction after Typhoon Morakot: Achievements and Reflection on Its 10th Anniversary (II) - Building a Colorful Sustainable Community

10.6653/MoCICHE.201906_46(3).0002

陳振川(Jenn-Chuan Chern)

土木水利

46卷3期（2019 / 06 / 01）

14 - 30

繁體中文

台灣在過去廿年間，分別經歷921大地震及莫拉克颱風巨大災害之侵襲，造成大規模之國土環境、基礎建設及建築物之破壞、民眾生命財產之嚴重損失，在救災過程並引致政治效應。由於大量建築物及社區因災害而崩損或成為危險地區，災民安置成為災後重建重要一環。本文介紹莫拉克颱風災後政府如何結合民間力量推動家園安置工作，並和921大地震之安置作法之差異性併做分析探討。莫拉克災後安置，因為豪雨所致土石流、坡地崩塌及淹水等災害特性及其破壞，造成原居住地不安全，致有大量異地重建之需求，而大多數需要安置災民為居住於丘陵或山區之原住民，部分經濟較為弱勢，加上文化、族群及生活型態之特殊性，成為本次家園重建之重要考量。莫拉克家園重建係兼顧永久屋基地及原鄉，在國土保育及安全永續綱要指導、和尊重災民自主意願下，朝「彩虹永續社區」目標發展。推動中，係結合民間NGO及企業力量，以直接推動永久屋為主，必要時以組合屋為輔，利用既有之軍營營區、榮眷中心等建築設施做為中期安置，做為安置之主軸。在災後十年，本文就家園安置執行發展之成果及經驗提出討論，並藉由歷年來各項學術統計分析調查來佐證。調查資料顯示重建區災民經過初期之艱困過程，在安置計畫協助下，逐年適應新居住環境，而有高滿意度。莫拉克颱風災後安置模式也順利應用於台灣後續災難之災民安置，此經驗將可提供世界各國參考。

During the past 20 years, Taiwan has been hit by the 1999 Jiji Earthquake and Typhoon Morakot, suffering considerable damage to its land, environment, basic infrastructure and great loss of life and properties, while also facing political ramifications incurred during the disaster relief operation. Due to the destruction of a large number of buildings and communities, many disaster zones became places too dangerous to live. Therefore, how to resettle the victims became an important task. This article will illustrate how the government joined forced with private industries to carry out the resettlement project, and analyze how it is different from the resettlement plans developed after the 1999 Jiji Earthquake. Major disasters caused by the heavy rain Typhoon Morakot brought such as mudslides, landslides and flooding have rendered the victims' original residences uninhabitable. As a result, it was inevitable to rebuild their homes in different locations. Many of the victims are indigenous people, living on hills or in mountains and economically disadvantaged. Moreover, they all have very unique ethnic and cultural backgrounds, as well as a distinct lifestyle. All these factors were taken into careful consideration when we planned the reconstruction of their homeland. The post-Morakot homeland reconstruction project pays equal attention to new permanent house community and their hometown. Following the guidelines for land conservation, safety considerations, and environmental sustainability, and on condition that the victims' voices were duly taken notice of, we carried out the Morakot Home Reconstruction project with the goal of creating a ＂Colorful Sustainable Community.＂ The government enlisted the help of NGOs and business corporations to aim at providing permanent housing as the direct key target, and temporary housing as the needed supporting one. Besides, in accordance with the main resettlement policy, military camps, veteran houses and other facilities were used as mid-term shelters. This article will offer a review of the implementation of this resettlement plan and our achievements. The arguments will be supported by data collected from various academic surveys conducted over the years. In general, they indicate that after getting through some difficult times in the beginning and with the support many resettlement efforts offered, the victims have adopted to their new homes year by year, and have showed a high level of satisfaction. The Morakot post-disaster resettlement model has also been successfully applied to relocating victims in several subsequent disasters in Taiwan. Thus, it can serve as a reliable source materials for other countries to consult.

1. 陳振川,洪世益(2012)。大規模災害家園重建策略─以莫拉克颱風重建為例。災害防救科技與管理學刊，1(1)，63-79。
   連結：
2. 謝志誠,陳竹山,林萬億(2013)。跳過中繼直達永久？探討莫拉克災後永久屋政策的形成。台灣社會研究季刊，93，49-86。
   連結：
3. 謝志誠,傅從喜,陳竹山,林萬億(2012)。一條離原鄉愈來愈遠的路？：莫拉克颱風災後異地重建政策的再思考。臺大社工學刊，26，41-86。
   連結：
4. 內政部（民 95），921 震災住宅重建進度總結報告，民國 95 年 3 月。
5. 全國成(2018)。國立暨南大學公共行政與政策學系。
6. 邱柏勳,李依仁,洪毓芸(2015)。從災後異地重建中社區重建工作者的角色─以莫拉克風災為例。社區發展季刊，152，325-331。
7. 張光甫,陳振川,鐘偉舜(2007)。921 大地震『築巢專案』之執行服務成果。台灣混凝土學會 2007 混凝土工程研討會論文集
8. 張麗珠(2014)。,國立屏東科技大學。
9. 陳振川,吳月招(2012).莫拉克颱風災後救助與安置.行政院莫拉克颱風災後重建推動委員會.
10. 陳振川,張恆裕(2014).莫拉克颱風災後重建五周年成果彙編.行政院莫拉克颱風災後重建推動委員會.
11. 陳振川,張恆裕(2014).創新協力重建永續家園.行政院莫拉克颱風災後重建推動委員會.
12. 陳振川,劉敬宗(2011)。莫拉克颱風災後重建─效率、尊重、創新。建築師雜誌，37(12)，68-75。
13. 陳振川,劉敬宗,許芛溱(2013).在廢墟中站起來─莫拉克災後校園重建.行政院莫拉克颱風災後重建推動委員會.
14. 陳振川,劉敬宗,黃恆瑩(2014).莫拉克颱風災後心理（靈）重建挑戰與創新.行政院莫拉克颱風災後重建推動委員會.
15. 傅從喜,林萬億,謝志誠,林珍珍(2014)。莫拉克災後遷村策略對社區凝聚之影響。科技部研究計畫研討會
16. 廖振驊(2019).重建心路─九二一地震與莫拉克颱風災後重建比較.
17. 鄭淳毅（民 101），「重建，雖然是災難，我們學到很多」─ 中繼屋經驗再思考，莫拉克獨立新聞網，民國 101 年 7 月。
18. 鄧傳忠(2017)。,國家災害防救科技中心。
19. 謝志誠(2001).回家的路─築巢專案系列.財團法人九二一震災重建基金會.
20. 謝志誠(2009)。,國立台灣大學。
21. 謝臥龍,駱慧文,許文耀,陳武宗(2011)。內政部委託研究報告內政部委託研究報告,內政部。
22. 譚佳音(2015)。中山大學公共事務管理研究所。

1. 鄧傳忠,曾敏惠,陳宏宇,吳郁玶(2021)。社區災害韌性的探討：以莫拉克颱風災區重建為例。地理學報，99，1-31。