题名

溪流魚類生態檢核與自然解方之研究-以大安溪為例

并列篇名

The Study of Stream Fish Ecology Checklist and Nature-Based Solutions: A Case Study of Da-an River

作者

高偉傑(Kao, Wei-Chieh)

关键词

生態檢核 ; 自然解方 ; 克利金分析 ; Ecological Checklist ; Nature-based Solutions ; Kriging Analysis

期刊名称

休憩管理研究

卷期/出版年月

9卷2期(2022 / 12 / 01)

页次

1 - 12

内容语文

繁體中文;英文

中文摘要

本研究旨在探討大安溪水管橋工程對溪流魚類生態的影響,並提出基於自然條件為本的解決方案(NbS)。本研究透過公共工程生態檢核機制流程,擬定了迴避、縮小、減輕和補償等四項生態保育策略,並利用克利金法進行空間分析,評估工程前中後的魚類生態資源變化。本研究發現,經生態檢核提出生態保育策略後,工程完工後魚類生態恢復情況良好,顯示生態檢核的參與對於減少工程對生態的影響和促進生物多樣性保育有重要作用。本文也討論了NbS的定義、原則、類別和挑戰,並指出NbS是一種與自然生態系合作的方法,可以解決氣候變化等社會挑戰,同時提供人類福祉和生物多樣性的益處。

英文摘要

This study aims to investigate the impact of the Da'anxi Water Pipe Bridge project on the stream's aquatic ecology and proposes Nature-based Solutions (NbS) tailored to the natural conditions. Utilizing the public engineering ecological checklist process, the study develops four ecological conservation strategies: avoidance, reduction, mitigation, and compensation. Spatial analysis, specifically Kriging, is used to evaluate changes in fish ecology resources before, during, and after the project. The findings indicate that the post-construction recovery of fish ecology is favorable following the implementation of ecological conservation strategies derived from the ecological checklist. This underscores the vital role of incorporating ecological checklists in mitigating the project's ecological impact and enhancing biodiversity conservation. Additionally, the paper delves into the definition, principles, categories, and challenges of NbS, highlighting that NbS represents a synergistic approach with natural ecosystems. This approach addresses societal challenges such as climate change while simultaneously yielding benefits for human well-being and biodiversity.

主题分类 社會科學 > 體育學
社會科學 > 管理學
参考文献
  1. 郭品含(2019)。河川治理與管理工程中生態檢核機制之落實。土木水利,46(4),72-78。
    連結:
  2. Childs, C.(2004).Interpolating surfaces in ArcGIS spatial analyst.ArcUser,3235(569),32-35.
  3. Cohen-Shacham, E.,Walters, G.,Janzen, C.,Maginnis, S.(2016).Nature-based solutions to address global societal challenges.Gland, Switzerland:IUCN.
  4. Daigneault, A.,Brown, P.,Gawith, D.(2016).Dredging versus hedging: Comparing hard infrastructure to ecosystem-based adaptation to flooding.Ecological Economics,122,25-35.
  5. Faivre, N.,Fritz, M.,Freitas, T.,De Boissezon, B.,Vandewoestijne, S.(2017).Nature Based Solutions in the EU: Innovating with nature to address social, economic and environmental challenges.Environmental research,159,509-518.
  6. Finewood, M. H.(2016).Green infrastructure, grey epistemologies, and the urban political ecology of Pittsburgh's water governance.Antipode,48(4),1000-1021.
  7. Kotsila, P.,Anguelovski, I.,Baró, F.,Langemeyer, J.,Sekulova, F.,JT Connolly, J.(2021).Nature-based solutions as discursive tools and contested practices in urban nature’s neoliberalisation processes.Environment and planning E: Nature and space,4(2),252-274.
  8. Morris, R. L.,Konlechner, T. M.,Ghisalberti, M.,Swearer, S. E.(2018).From grey to green: Efficacy of eco‐engineering solutions for nature‐based coastal defence.Global change biology,24(5),1827-1842.
  9. O'Hogain, S.,McCarton, L.(2018).Nature-based solutions. A Technology Portfolio of Nature Based.Solutions:Innovations in Water Management.
  10. Padma, P.,Ramakrishna, S.,Rasoolimanesh, S. M.(2022).Nature-based solutions in tourism: A review of the literature and conceptualization.Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research,46(3),442-466.
  11. Reguero, B. G.,Beck, M. W.,Bresch, D. N.,Calil, J.,Meliane, I.(2018).Comparing the cost effectiveness of nature-based and coastal adaptation: A case study from the Gulf Coast of the United States.PloS one,13(4),e0192132.
  12. Seddon, N.,Chausson, A.,Berry, P.,Girardin, C. A.,Smith, A.,Turner, B.(2020).Understanding the value and limits of nature-based solutions to climate change and other global challenges.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B,375(1794),20190120.
  13. Supergeo (2021),https://www.supergeotek.com/。
  14. World Economic Forum(2019).The Global Risks Report 2019.Geneva, Switzerland:World Economic Forum.
  15. 水土保持局水土保持工程生態檢核資訊專區(2021),https://eco.swcb.gov.tw/mis_Extention/EcologicalChecklist/EcoIndex.aspx
  16. 何幸娟,林晉守,林伯勳,黃景滄,蔡明發,高伯宗(2020)。水庫集水區工程生態檢核機制及策略評析。中興工程,148,3-11。
  17. 葉恰成,陳伯愷,周文杰(2007)。異空間分佈點之因果迴歸分析─克利金法與 AASN 神經網路之比較。農業工程學報,53(1),51-61。