题名

運算思維與中小學資訊科技課程

作者

林育慈；吳正己

关键词

資訊科技課程 ； 運算思維 ； 程式設計教學

期刊名称

教育脈動

卷期/出版年月

6期（2016 / 06 / 01）

页次

5 - 20

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

各先進國家為因應資訊科技的發展與國家人才需求，皆重新擬訂資訊科技課程之理念與方向。我國資訊科技課程歷經數次變革，十二年國教總綱中已將「資訊科技」列為國、高中之必修課程，課綱草案亦已將運算思維列為重要理念，希冀由運算思維之培養，提升學生善用運算思維與資訊科技工具解決問題、合作共創、溝通表達等高階能力。本文除探討我國及世界各國資訊科技課程發展理念外，並由程式設計與STEM理念分別提出運算思維教學的實施策略，藉以拋磚引玉，喚起各界對資訊科技教育之重視與投入。
主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. Google (2015). Exploring Computational Thinking. Retrieved from https://www.google.com/edu/resources/programs/exploring-computationalthinking/
  2. Lewis, M. (2010). Problem Solving through Programming with Greenfoot. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.186.959&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  3. Australian Curriculum, Assessment, Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2013). Draft Australian curriculum technologies. Retrieved from http://consultation.australiancurriculum.edu.au/Static/docs/Technologies/Draft%20Australian%20Curriculum%20Technologies%20-%20February%202013.pdf
  4. Computer Science Teachers Association (CSTA) (2003). CSTA K–12 computer science standards. The ACM K-12 Education Task Force. Retrieved from https://csta.acm.org/Curriculum/sub/CurrFiles/K-12ModelCurr2ndEd.pdf
  5. 國家教育研究院（2015）。十二年國教科技領域「資訊科技」科目課程綱要草案。未出版。
  6. College Board. (2014). AP Computer Science Principles Curriculum Framework. Retrieved from http://secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/ap/apcomputer-science-principles-curriculum-framework.pdf
  7. ISTE (2013). ISTE's NETS for Students. Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/docs/pdfs/nets-s-standards.pdf?sfvrsn=2
  8. CSTA (2011). CSTA K–12 computer science standards. The ACM K-12 Education Task Force. Retrieved from http://www.csta.acm.org/Curriculum/sub/CurrFiles/CSTA_K-12_CSS.pdf
  9. Partnership for 21st Century Skills (2007). Framework for 21st Century Learning. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/docs/P21_framework_0116.pdf
  10. White House (2016). Computer Science for All. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2016/01/30/computer-science-all
  11. Department for Education in England (DOEE) (2013, September 11). National curriculum in England: Computing programmes of study. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-computing-programmes-of-study/national-curriculum-in-england-computing-programmes-of-study
  12. American National Research Council(2011).Report of a Workshop on the Pedagogical Aspects of Computational Thinking.
  13. Barr, V.,Stephenson, C.(2011).Bringing computational thinking to K-12: What is involved and what is the role of the computer science education community?.ACM Inroads,2,48-54.
  14. Bell, T.,Alexander, J.,Freeman, I.,Grimley, M.(2009).Computer science unplugged: School students doing real computing without computers.The New Zealand Journal of Applied Computing and Information Technology,13(1),20-29.
  15. Brennan, K.,Resnick, M.(2012).New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking.Annual American Educational Research Association Meeting,Vancouver, BC, Canada:
  16. Brinda, T.,Puhlmann, H.,Schulte, C.(2009).Bridging ICT and CS: educational standards for computer science in lower secondary education.ACM SIGCSE Bulletin,41(3),288-292.
  17. Chi, H.,Jain, H.(2011).Teaching Computing to STEM Students via Visualization Tools.Procedia Computer Science,4,1937-1943.
  18. Connor, K.,A.,Ferri, B.,Meehan, K.(2013).Models of Mobile Hands-On STEM Education Models of Mobile Hands-On STEM Education.120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
  19. de Jong, T.,Ferguson-Hessler, M.(1996).Types and qualities of knowledge.Education Psychologist,31(2),105-113.
  20. Grgurina, N.,Tolboom, J.(2008).The First Decade of Informatics in Dutch High Schools.Informatics in Education,7(1),55-74.
  21. Grover, S.,Pea, R.(2013).Computational Thinking in K-12: A Review of the State of the Field.Educational Researcher,42(1),38-43.
  22. Hambrusch, S.,Hoffmann, C.,Korb, J. T.,Haugan, M.,Hosking, A. L.(2009).A multidisciplinary approach towards computational thinking for science majors.ACM SIGCSE Bulletin,41(1),183-187.
  23. Henderson, P. B.,Cortina, T. J.,Hazzan, O.,Wing, J. M.(2007).Computational thinking.Proceedings of the 38th ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '07),New York, NY:
  24. Hiebert, J.(Ed.)(1986).Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge: The Case of Mathematics.Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
  25. Howland, K.,Good, J.,Nicholson, K.(2009).Language-based support for computational thinking.Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing, 2009. VL/HCC 2009. IEEE Symposium on
  26. Jonas, M.,Sabin, M.(2015).Computational thinking in Greenfoot: AI game strategies for CS1: conference workshop.Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges,30(6),8-10.
  27. Long, C.(2005).Maths concepts in teaching: procedural and conceptual knowledge.Pythagoras,62,59-65.
  28. Mataric, M.,Koenig, N.,Feil-Seifer, D.(2007).Materials for Enabling Hands-On Robotics and STEM Education.AAAI Spring Symposium on Robots and Robot Venues: Resources for AI Education,Stanford, CA.:
  29. Psycharis, S.(2013).Examining the effect of the computational models on learning performance, scientific reasoning, epistemic beliefs and argumentation: An implication for the STEM agenda.Computers & Education,68,253-265.
  30. Selby, C.,Woollard, J.(2014).Computational Thinking: The developing definitions.Proceedings of the 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE 2014
  31. The Association for Computing Machinery=ACM(2005).Computing Curricula 2005: The Overview Report. The Joint Task Force for Computing Curricula 2005.
  32. Wing, J.(2008).Computational thinking and thinking about computing.Philosophical Transactions on the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences,366(1881),3717-3725.
  33. Wing, J. M.(2006).Computational thinking.Communications of the ACM,49(3),33-35.
  34. Yılmaz, İ.,Yalçın N.(2011).Probability and possibility calculation statistics for data variables (VDOIHI); statistical methods for combined stage percentage calculation.International Online Journal of Educational Sciences,3(3),957-979.
  35. Yılmaz, İ.,Yalçın, N.(2012).The Relationship of Procedural and Declarative Knowledge of Science Teacher Candidates in Newton's Laws of Motion to Understanding.American International Journal of Contemporary,2(3),50-56.
  36. 何榮桂(2015)。試論十二年國民基本教育「資訊科技」 課程綱要規劃草案。科學教育月刊，250，48-64。
  37. 吳正己(2010)。臺灣中小學資訊科技教育的沿革與現況。中國教育技術協會資訊技術教育專業委員會第六屆學術年會暨海峽兩岸信息技術教育研討會論文集，西安，中國:
  38. 吳正己、何榮桂(1998)。高級中學現行電腦課程的內涵與特色。科學教育月刊，208，26-32。
  39. 教育部(2008)。普通高級中學必修科目「資訊科技概論」課程綱要。臺北:作者。
  40. 教育部(2008)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要重大議題－資訊教育。臺北:作者。
  41. 教育部(2006)。高級中學課程暫行綱要─高級中學選修科目「資訊科技概論」課程綱要。臺北:作者。
  42. 教育部中等教育司(1995)。國民中學課程標準。臺北:作者。
被引用次数
  1. 陳秋燕,邱瓊芳,吳正己(2021)。高中資訊科技教科書資訊科學史內容分析。科學教育學刊，29(2)，167-189。
  2. 陳怡芬、翁禎苑、林育慈(2018)。運算思維導向程式設計教學－以「動手玩音樂」模組化程式設計為例。中等教育，69(2)，127-141。
  3. 胡秋帆,林育慈,吳正己,王恩慈(2020)。十二年國教資訊科技科目學習次概念之探究。教育研究集刊，66(1)，77-102。
  4. 林菁(2020)。探究式資訊素養融入國中階段課程之追蹤研究。教育資料與圖書館學，57(1)，73-120。
  5. 劉旨峰,黃元彥,林俊閎(2019)。機器人學習活動中的程式學習困境：以南投縣偏鄉機器人中學社團為例。數位學習科技期刊，11(2)，1-35。
  6. 盧美麗,蔡文宬(2023)。科技輔助融入網球體育教學學生學習動機與自我效能之研究。嶺東通識教育研究學刊，10(1)，53-88。
  7. 翁志強(2023)。經濟學課程中運算思維能力的培養與運用。商管科技季刊，24(2)，163-193。
  8. 謝文偉,陳建廷(2023)。STEAM素養融入籃球投籃教學對大學生學習成效之影響。中原體育學報，20，59-74。
  9. 掌慶維,李宏盈,吳采陵(2020)。體育師資生與科技教學內容知識（TPACK）關係之探討。中華體育季刊，34(2)，89-97。
  10. 周倩,李怡慧(2023)。數位教科書或網路教材資源？臺灣國高中資訊科技教師之使用現況、觀點與期待。教科書研究，16(1)，45-77。
  11. (2019)。結合桌遊的運算思維翻轉學習模式對小學生學習表現之影響。教育研究月刊，301，50-65。
  12. (2021)。積木式程式設計之學習成效後設分析。教育學報，49(2)，71-95。
  13. (2023)。臺灣國小教師運用ICT於學生專題學習之決策樹分析。清華教育學報，40(2)，1-47。
print cancel