题名

More than ＂Family＂: Conceptual Blending and Jiātíng in Mandarin

并列篇名

「家庭」功能多：從概念合成理論看華語中的家庭觀念

DOI

10.6554/JKTUHS.2017.0301.02

作者

陳凱琳(Kelly Kai-Ling Chen)；謝菁玉(Shelley Ching-Yu Depner)

关键词

family concepts ； conceptual blending ； prototype ； Mandarin ； 家庭觀念 ； 概念合成 ； 原型理論 ； 華語

期刊名称

高雄應用科技大學人文與社會科學學刊

卷期/出版年月

3卷1期（2017 / 06 / 01）

页次

23 - 32

内容语文

英文
中文摘要

The present study examines the contexts of jiāting in terms of conceptual blending (Fauconnier & Turner, 1998, 2002) with the data taken from Academia Sinica Balanced Corpus of Modern Chinese. We aim to find out: 1. How do people in Taiwan conceptualize family? 2. What dimensions of conceptual blending are employed in the conception of jiātíng? 3. How does prototype theory assist demonstrating the conceptualization of jiātíng? The results show the prototypical concept of family in the language community and manifest five dimensions of compression in conceptual blending: identity, part-whole, space, cause-effect and time. Through cognitive linguistic analysis, the way we perceive the world and store the experience in our mind is made clear.
英文摘要

本研究從中研院的現代漢語平衡擷取和「家庭」相關的語料，以概念合成和原型理論來探討以下的研究問題：一、臺灣人是如何概念化「家庭」？二、語言使用者在表達與理解家庭概念時，乃依循那些概念融合維度？三、原始理論如何協助證明家庭概念化？我們的研究結果顯示：「家庭」在華語使用者的理解範疇中出現五個維度：本體特性、部分─整體、空間、成因─結果以及時間。透過概念整合與原型理論，我們可以清楚觀察我們對人生活中對家庭的認知與這些經驗在語言運用的視角。
主题分类 人文學 > 人文學綜合
社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
参考文献
  1. Chen, K. J., & Huang, C. R. (2001). Academia Sinica Balanced Corpus of Mandarin Chinese (Version 4.0) [Academia Sinica]. Retrieved from http://asbc.iis. sinica.edu.tw/index_readme.htm
  2. Braman, J.(Ed.),Vincenti, G.(Ed.),Trajkovski, G.(Ed.)(2009).Handbook of research on computational arts and creative informatics.Hershey, PA:Information Science Reference.
  3. Evans, V.,Green, M.(2006).Cognitive linguistics: An introduction.Edinburgh, England:Edinburgh University Press.
  4. Fang, Y.,Shulgina, E. M.(2014).The concept "family" in the Russian and Chinese linguistic views of the world.Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,154,162-169.
  5. Fauconnier, G.,Turner, M.(2002).The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind's hidden complexities.New York, NY:Basic Books.
  6. Fauconnier, G.,Turner, M.(1998).Conceptual integration networks.Cognitive Science,22(2),133-187.
  7. Feng, C.(1989).Tántán hànyǔ de míngcí "jiā".Chinese Language Learning,6,31-33.
  8. Huang, H. S.(2001).Qiāncí "jiā" de shìyì.Language Planning,12,39.
  9. Lakoff, G.,Johnson, M.(2003).Metaphors: We live by.Chicago, IL:The University of Chicago Press.
  10. Lakoff, G.,Johnson, M.(1980).The metaphorical structure of the human conceptual system.Cognitive Science,4(2),195-208.
  11. Leung, W. Y. Y.(2008).A contrastive study of Chinese and English metaphors of English.LCOM Papers,1,21-35.
  12. Liu, Q.(2014).Fujian, China,Fujian Normal University.
  13. Rosch, E.(Ed.),Lloyd, B. B.(Ed.)(1978).Cognition and categorization.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
  14. Shu, D.(2015).Chinese xiehouyu and the interpretation of metaphor and metonymy.Journal of Pragmatics,86,74-79.
  15. Tsohatzidis, S. L.(Ed.)(1990).Meanings and prototypes: Studies in linguistic categorization.London, England:Routledge.
  16. Ungerer, F.,Schimid, H. J.(2006).An introduction to cognitive linguistics.London, England:Person Education.
  17. Wu, H. J.(1995)."Jiā" "lìng" "shè" jí qítā.Language Planning,7,36-37.
  18. Yamada, N.(1991).Metaphorical expressions about houses in Japanese and English.Intercultural Communication Studies,1(2),199-213.
print cancel