文化權利的多重性：爭辯、限制與可能

The Multiplicity of Cultural Rights: Debates, Constraints and Possibilities

10.6394/JHSS.201407_(15).0011

王志弘(Chih-Hung Wang)

文化權 ； 城市權 ； 文化治理 ； 翻譯政治 ； cultural rights ； right to the city ； cultural governance ； politics of translation

人文社會學報

15期（2014 / 07 / 01）

291 - 319

繁體中文

本文在都市脈絡中，討論文化權利的多重性及其隱含的爭辯、限制和可能。首先，作者探討城市概念和文化權概念的多重性，指出文化權具有普同論和特殊論兩種內涵，以及制度面和價值面兩種操作模式，彼此支持又相互衝突，因而需要在各方之間從事翻譯。其次，文化權的概念和運作無法脫離政治、經濟與社會場域，以及其他權利領域；這種鑲嵌和互動的狀態，既是其限制，也是可能性的根源。第三，在都市文化治理的趨勢下，文化權既是治理與規訓權力的策略性工具，具有淨化綏靖效果，也是進步力量得以挪用的抵抗依據。最後，本文主張，必須將文化權納入爭取城市權的社會轉型計畫。中，方能發揮文化權的積極作用。

The article discusses the multiplicity of cultural right and its implicit debates, constraints and possibilities in the urban context. First, the author explores the multiple implications of the concepts of city and cultural right, suggesting that translation is needed among different implications. There are two connotations, universalism and particularism, in the concept of cultural right with both institutional and value-oriented modes of operation which are mutually supportive and conflicting at the same time. Secondly, the concept and operation of cultural right are embedded in the political, economic and social fields , as well as other kinds of right, and this situation results in both limitations and possibilities. Furthermore, under the trend of urban cultural governance, the cultural right is not only a strategic tool for governing and disciplinary power with effects of purification and appeasement, but also the basis of resistance to be appropriated by progressive forces. Finally, the author argues that the cultural right concept must be incorporated into social transformation projects for rights to the city in order to realize its active potential.

1. 王志弘(2010)。都市社會運動的顯性文化轉向？1990年代迄今的台北經驗。國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究學報，16，39-64。
   連結：
2. 王志弘(2012)。新文化治理體制與國家─社會關係：剝皮寮的襲產化。世新人文社會學報，13，1-40。
   連結：
3. 王俐容(2006)。文化公民權的建構：文化政策的發展與公民權的落實。公共行政學報，20，129-159。
   連結：
4. 王俐容(2005)。文化政策中的經濟論述：從菁英文化到文化經濟？。文化研究，1，169-195。
   連結：
5. 林文源(2007)。論行動者網絡理論的行動本體論。科技、醫療與社會，4，65-108。
   連結：
6. 趙剛(2006)。「多元文化」的修辭、政治和理論。臺灣社會研究季刊，62，147-189。
   連結：
7. Park, Robert E., Burgess, Ernest W., and Mckenzie, Roderick D.(1925) The City. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
8. Wirth, Louis(1938) "Urbanism as a way of life." American Journal of Sociology 44: 1-24
9. Amin, A.,Thrift, Nigel(2002).Cities: Reimagining the Urban.Cambridge:Polity.
10. Attoh, Kafui A.(2011).What kind of right is the right to the city?.Progress in Human Geography,35(5),669-685.
11. Brenner, Neil(ed.),Marcuse, Peter(ed.),Mayer, Margit(ed.)(2012).Cities for People, not for Profit: Critical Urban Theory and the Right to the City.London:Routledge.
12. Castells, Manuel(1977).The Urban Question.Cambridge, MA:The MIT Press.
13. Castells, Manuel(1983).The City and the Grassroots: A Cross-Cultural Theory of Urban Social Movements.Berkeley, CA:University of California Press.
14. Eagleton, Terry(2000).The Idea of Culture.Oxford:Blackwell.
15. Freiberg, J.W.(ed.)(1979).Critical Sociology: European Perspective.New York:Irvington.
16. Gregory, Derek(ed.),Urry, John(ed.)(1985).Social Relations and Spatial Structures.New York:St. Martin's Press.
17. Grodach, Carl,Loukaitou-Sideris, Anastasia(2007).Cultural development strategies and urban revitalization: A survey of US cities.International Journal of Cultural Policy,13(4),349-370.
18. Harvey, David(2008).The right to the city.New Left Review,53,23-40.
19. Harvey, David(1985).Consciousness and the Urban Experience.Oxford:Basil Blackwell.
20. Harvey, David(2012).Rebel Cities: from the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution.London:Verso.
21. Harvey, David(2001).Globalization and the 'spatial fix'.Geographische Revue,2,23-30.
22. Harvey, David(1982).The Limits to Capital.Oxford:Basil Blackwell.
23. Lefebvre, Henri(1991).The Production of Space.Oxford:Blackwell.
24. Lefebvre, Henri(1996).Writings On Cities.Oxford:Blackwell.
25. Marcuse, Peter(2009).From critical urban theory to the right to the city.City,13(2-3),185-196.
26. Marshall, Thomas Humphrey(1950).Citizenship and Social Class, and Other Essays.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
27. Massey, Doreen(ed.),Allen, John(ed.),Pile, Steve(ed.)(1999).City Worlds.London:Routledge.
28. Miller, Toby(2006).Cultural Citizenship: Cosmopolitanism, and Television in a Neoliberal Age.Philadelphia:Temple University Press.
29. Mitchell, Don(2003).The Right to the City: Social Justice and the Fight for Public Space.New York:Guilford Press.
30. Pahi, Ray E.(1975).Whose City?.Harmondsworth:Penguin.
31. Pahl, Ray E.(ed.)(1968).Readings in Urban Sociology.Oxford:Pergarnon Press.
32. Panitch, Leo(ed.),Leys, Colin(ed.)(2002).Socialist Register : A World of Contradictions.London:Merlin Press.
33. Park, Robert E.(1952).Human Communities: The City and Human Ecology.New York:Free Press.
34. Parsons, Talcott,Semlser, Neil J.(1956).Economy and Society.London:Routledge & Kegan Paul.
35. Purcell, Mark(2002).Excavating Lefebvre: The right to the city and its urban politics of the inhabitant.GeoJournal,58,99-108.
36. Purcell, Mark(2003).Citizenship and the right to the global city: Reimagining the capitalist world order.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,27(3),564-90.
37. Rex, John,Moore, Robert(1967).Race, Community, and Conflict.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
38. Souza, Marcelo Lopes de(2010).Which right to which city? In defence of political-strategic clarity.Interface,2(1),315-333.
39. Star, Susan Leigh,Griesemer, James R.(1998).Institutional ecology, 'translations' and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-29.Social Studies of Science,19(3),387-420.
40. Williams, Raymond(1983).Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society.London:Fontana Press.
41. Wolff, Kurt(ed.)(1950).The Sociology of Georg Simmel.New York:Free Press.
42. 王志弘(2010)。文化如何治理？一個分析架構的概念性探討。世新人文社會學報，11，1-38。
43. 徐進鈺(2011)。市民城市權論述的建構：找回城市的使用價值。台灣社會研究季刊，81，469-476。
44. 劉俊裕(2013)。「文化基本法」與台灣常民文化生活：國家文化政策與文化權利的實踐。2013文化的軌跡：文化治理的能動與反動國際學術研討會論文集