题名

經顱磁剌激改善中風後動作恢復與大腦功能性聯結影像學之探討

DOI

10.6666/ClinMed.201902_83(2).0016

作者

蔡元淵;蔡泊意

关键词

重覆性經顱磁刺激(repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, rTMS) ; 動作恢復(motor recovery) ; 靜息狀態功能性磁振造影(resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging, RS-fMRI) ; 功能性聯結(functional connectivity)

期刊名称

臨床醫學月刊

卷期/出版年月

83卷2期(2019 / 02 / 22)

页次

86 - 91

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

中風患者腦部梗塞後,其神經纖維密度、大腦半球內與半球間功能性聯結受到影響,造成動作缺失與功能障礙。急性期兩大腦半球間的運動與感覺區功能性聯結會下降,此聯結下降程度可預測未來功能恢復程度。有效的恢復在慢性期,兩大腦半球間的運動與感覺區功能性聯結會趨近梗塞前正常的功能性聯結;患側大腦半球內運動、感覺及其他的功能性聯結網絡會增加,反映大腦功能性網絡有效的整合與重組(integration and reorganization)。而藉由靜息狀態功能性磁振造影檢查,證實經顱磁刺激可改變大腦皮質興奮性。興奮性磁刺激刺激患側主要運動皮質後,患側主要運動皮質與健側主要運動皮質的功能性聯結會增加,其增加程度與運動恢復直接相關;患側主要運動皮質與健側輔助運動區的功能性聯結會增加,和動作計畫、動作執行能力之恢復有關。在梗塞急性期,興奮性高脈衝式(intermittent theta burst)刺激患側主要運動皮質後,患側主要運動皮質與患側輔助運動區、患側中扣帶迴皮質、健側主要運動皮質、健側背端前運動皮質(dorsal premotor cortex)間的功能性聯結會增加。可見經顱磁刺激利用大腦可塑性重組大腦功能性網絡,影響患側大腦半球內與兩大腦半球間的功能性聯結以恢復動作功能。

主题分类 醫藥衛生 > 基礎醫學
醫藥衛生 > 社會醫學
参考文献
  1. Hermann, DM,Chopp, M.(2012).Promoting brain remodeling and plasticity for stroke recovery: therapeutic promise and potential pitfalls of clinical translation.Lancet Neurol,11,369-380.
  2. Johansen-Berg, H,Della-Maggiore, V,Behrens, TE(2007).Integrity of white matter in the corpus callosum correlates with bimanual co-ordination skills.Neuroimage,36,T16-T21.
  3. Klein, MM,Treister, R,Raij, T(2015).Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the brain: guidelines for pain treatment research.PAIN,156,1601-1604.
  4. Lee, J,Park, E,Lee, A(2018).Alteration and role of interhemispheric and intrahemispheric connectivity in motor network after stroke.Brain Topogr,31,708-719.
  5. Li, Jing,Zhang, Xue-Wei,Zuo, Zhen-Tao(2016).Cerebral functional reorganization in ischemic stroke after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: an fMRI study.CNS Neurosci Ther,22,952-960.
  6. Mori, F,Codecà, C,Kusayanagi, H.Effects of intermittent theta burst stimulation on spasticity in patients with multiple sclerosis.Eur J Neurol,17,295-300.
  7. Nijboer, TCW,Buma, FE,Winters, C(2017).No changes in functional connectivity during motor recovery beyond 5 weeks after stroke; A longitudinal resting-state fMRI study.PLoS One,12,e0178017.
  8. Ovadia-Caro, S,Margulies, DS,Villringer, A(2014).The value of resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging in stroke.Stroke,45,2818-2824.
  9. Rossi, S,Hallett, M,Rossini, PM(2009).Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research.Clin Neurophysiol,120,2008-2039.
  10. Smith, SM,Fox, PT,Miller, KL(2009).Correspondence of the brain's functional architecture during activation and rest.PNAS,106,13040-13045.
  11. Talelli, P,Wallace, A,Dileone, M(2012).Theta burst stimulation in the rehabilitation of the upper limb: a semirandomized, placebo-controlled trial in chronic stroke patients.Neurorehabil Neural Repair,26,976-987.
  12. Thiel, A,Vahdat, S(2015).Thiel A, Vahdat S. Structural and restingstate brain connectivity of motor networks after stroke.Stroke,46,296-301.
  13. Van der Zijden, JP,van Eijsden, P,de Graaf, RA(2008).MR spectroscopic imaging of regionally specific metabolic alterations after experimental stroke.Brain,131,2209-2219.
  14. Volz, LJ,Rehme, AK,Michely, J(2016).Shaping early reorganization of neural networks promotes motor function after stroke.Cerebral Cortex,26,2882-2894.
  15. Watanabe, T,Hanajima, R,Shirota, Y(2014).Bidirectional effects on interhemispheric resting-state functional connectivity induced by excitatoryand inhibitory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.Hum Brain Map,35,1896-1905.
  16. Witte, OW,Bidmon, HJ,Schiene, K(2000).Functional differentiation of multiple perilesional zones after focal cerebral ischemia.J Cereb Blood Flow Metab,20,1149-1165.
  17. Yin, D,Song, F,Xu, D(2012).Patterns in cortical connectivity for determining outcomes in hand function after subcortical stroke.PLoS One,7,e52727.