题名

2024年美國糖尿病學會針對第2型糖尿病降血糖藥物之標準治療建議

DOI

10.6666/ClinMed.202409_94(3).0105

作者

郝立智;陳鏡方;范麒惠;林沅蓉;連小茵;蕭承愷;潘潔慧;梁維哲;陳昆祥;黃偉輔;楊純宜

关键词

糖尿病(diabetes mellitus, DM) ; 美國糖尿病學會(American Diabetes Association , ADA) ; 動脈粥樣硬化性心臟血管疾病(atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, ASCVD) ; 昇糖素類似胜肽-1(Glucagon-like-peptide-1, GLP-1) ; 鈉-葡萄糖協同轉運蛋白2抑制劑(SGLT2i)

期刊名称

臨床醫學月刊

卷期/出版年月

94卷3期(2024 / 09 / 27)

页次

601 - 613

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

此次更新的治療指引提出了以下建議:1.胰島素治療:建議使用胰島素類似物或吸入型胰島素,以減少低血糖風險;2.昇糖素(glucagon)處方:為使用胰島素注射或高低血糖風險患者開立昇糖素處方;3.治療計劃評估:定期評估糖尿病患者的治療計劃,以確保達成個人化目標;4.早期聯合治療:對成人第2型糖尿病患者進行早期聯合治療,縮短達成個人化治療目標的時間;5.藥物治療個性化:根據個人化的血糖和體重目標調整治療方案,特別是對無心血管和/或腎臟疾病的患者;6.額外降血糖藥物:對未達到血糖目標的患者,考慮使用額外的降血糖藥物;7.體重管理與血糖控制:強化與體重管理相關的治療方法,確保其與血糖管理目標一致;8.降血糖藥物選擇:優先選擇能降低心血管疾病、心臟衰竭和慢性腎臟病風險的藥物;9.心臟衰竭管理:對心臟衰竭患者,推薦使用鈉-葡萄糖協同轉運蛋白2抑制劑(sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, SGLT2i)來管理血糖並預防住院;10.慢性腎病治療:對第2型糖尿病和慢性腎病患者,應考慮在任何階段進行胰島素治療;11.雙重受體促進劑:使用gastric inhibitory polypeptide(GIP)和glucagon-like peptide-1(GLP-1)雙重受體促進劑,作為胰島素之外的額外血糖管理選擇;12.胰島素劑量評估:在增加GLP-1或雙重受體促進劑劑量時,重新評估胰島素劑量;13.治療目標益處:選擇具有體重管理、心臟代謝或腎臟益處的降血糖藥物;14.低血糖風險評估:在開始或加強胰島素治療時,重新評估其他降血糖藥物的需求和劑量;15.腸梗塞諮詢:向患者提供關於腸梗塞的諮詢,不建議對有胃輕癱病史的患者使用雙重受體促進劑;16.管理障礙指導:為可能阻礙糖尿病管理的患者提供照護指導原則。

主题分类 醫藥衛生 > 基礎醫學
醫藥衛生 > 社會醫學
参考文献
  1. Davies MJ, Aroda VR, Collins BS, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes,2022: a consensus report by the American Diabetes Association(ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes(EASD).Diabetes Care 2022;45:2753-86.
    連結:
  2. Fr_ıas JP, Davies MJ, Rosenstock J, et al. SURPASS-2 Investigators. Tirzepatide versus semaglutide once weekly in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2021;385:503-15.
    連結:
  3. Matthews DR, Pald_anius PM, Proot P, et al. VERIFY study group. Glycaemic durability of an early combination therapy with vildagliptin and metformin versus sequential metformin monotherapy in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes(VERIFY): a 5-year, multicentre, randomised, double-blind trial. Lancet 2019;394:1519-29.
    連結:
  4. Tsapas A, Avgerinos I, Karagiannis T, et al. Comparative effectiveness of glucose-lowering drugs for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2020;173:278-86.
    連結:
  5. Dahl D, Onishi Y, Norwood P, et al. Effect of subcutaneous tirzepatide vs placebo added to titrated insulin glargine on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: the SURPASS-5 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2022;327:534-45.
    連結:
  6. Herges JR, Neumiller JJ, McCoy RG. Easing the financial burden of diabetes management: a guide for patients and primary care clinicians. Clin Diabetes 2021;39:427-36.
    連結:
  7. Nathan DM, Lachin JM, Bebu I, et al. GRADE Study Research Group. Glycemia reduction in type 2 diabetes - microvascular and cardiovascular outcomes. N Engl J Med 2022; 387:1075-88.
    連結:
  8. londe L, Merilainen M, Karwe V. TITRATE Study Group. Patient-directed titration for achieving glycaemic goals using a once-daily basal insulin analogue: an assessment of two different fasting plasma glucose targets - the TITRATE study. Diabetes Obes Metab 2009;11:623-31.
    連結:
  9. emlitsch T, Engler J, Siebenhofer A, et al. (Ultra-) long-acting insulin analogues versus NPH insulin(human isophane insulin) for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020;11: CD005613.
    連結:
  10. efalu WT, Dawes DE, Gavlak G, et al. Insulin Access and Affordability Working Group. Insulin Access and Affordability Working Group: conclusions and recommendations. Diabetes Care 2018;41:1299-311.
    連結:
  11. cCall AL. Insulin therapy and hypoglycemia. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am2012;41:57-87.
    連結:
  12. e la Pe~na A, Riddle M, Morrow LA, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of high dose human regular U-500 insulin versus human regular U-100 insulin in healthy obese subjects. Diabetes Care 2011;34:2496-501.
    連結:
  13. ecker RH, Dahmen R, Bergmann K, et al. New insulin glargine 300 Units · mL-1 provides a more even activity profile and prolonged glycemic control at steady state compared with insulin glargine 100 Units · mL-1. Diabetes Care 2015;38:637-43.
    連結:
  14. orsatko S, Deller S, Koehler G, et al. A comparison of the steady-state pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of 100 and 200 U/mL formulations of ultra-long-acting insulin degludec. Clin Drug Investig 2013;33:515-21.
    連結:
  15. kturk HK, Snell-Bergeon JK, Rewers A, et al. Improved postprandial glucose with inhaled technosphere insulin compared with insulin aspart in patients with type 1 diabetes on multiple daily injections: the STATstudy. Diabetes Technol Ther 2018;20:639-47.
    連結:
  16. oogwerf BJ, Pantalone KM, Basina M, et al. Results of a 24-week trial of technosphere insulin versus insulin aspart in type 2 diabetes. Endocr Pract 2021;27:38-43.
    連結:
  17. astellanaM, Cignarelli A, Brescia F, et al. GLP-1 receptor agonist added to insulin versus basal-plus or basal-bolus insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2019;35:e3082.
    連結:
  18. odbard HW, Visco VE, Andersen H, et al. Treatment intensification with stepwise addition of prandial insulin aspart boluses compared with full basal-bolus therapy(FullSTEP Study): a randomised, treat-to-target clinical trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2014;2:30-7.
    連結:
  19. American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. 9. Pharmacologic approaches to glycemic treatment: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2024. Diabetes Care 2024;47(Suppl. 1):S158-78.
  20. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes(Position Statement). Diabetes Care 2009;28:S13-31.