以博物館作為都市振興的觸媒：以古根漢畢爾包分館為例

The Museum as Urban Economic Catalyst: Example of Guggenheim Museum Bilbao

10.6686/MuseQ.200701_21(2).0006

林明美(Ming-Mei Ling)

古根漢畢爾包分館 ； 文化資本 ； 文化經濟學 ； 都市振興 ； 經濟價值 ； Guggenheim Museum Bilbao ； cultural capital ； cultural economics ； urban revitalization ； economic value

博物館學季刊

21卷2期（2007 / 01 / 04）

97 - 113+115

繁體中文

近年來，以文化資本如藝術品、博物館、文化資產等，作為振興都市的積極力量，並在經濟上造成相當影響力的觀念及作法，在國際間已造成旋風，其中尤以興建在西班牙的古根漢畢爾包分館，造成的畢爾包及其所在地巴斯克省的都市振興案例最受囑目。本文從文化經濟學及都市規劃的觀點，探討古根漢畢爾包分館為畢爾包所帶來的經濟價值及效益，就「畢爾包2000」的都市振興計畫及古根漢基金會的營運特質進行檢視，並分析畢爾包分館的營運成效，最後分析歸納並提出建議，以作為國內相關博物館營運及相關城鄉規劃參考。

In recent years, there has emerged an international phenomenon of employing cultural capital such as art objects, museums and cultural heritage as effective means of expanding economic influence or as a potent force to invigorate a city. The most illustrious example is the Guggenheim Museum in Bilbao, Spain and the benefits that it has brought to the city of Bilbao. From the perspective of cultural economics, this paper endeavors to investigate the economic value and revitalization effects of the construction and opening of the Guggenheim Museum Bilbao. The urban revitalization of Bilbao, the operational features of the Guggenheim Foundation and the current performance of the institution itself shall be included in this discourse and analysis. This study will provide an important reference for museums and institutions of a similar nature in Taiwan and stimulate new thinking in terms of museum operations and management and related city planning.

1. (2004).Akron Museum Expansion on Track.Art in America.
2. (2004).The Seattle Art Museum recently unveiled its ambitious expansion plans designed by the Portland-based firm Allied Works Architecture, led by Brad Cloepfil.
3. (2006).Institute of American Indian Arts Museum Renovation Wins National Award of Excellences.News Service.
4. (2002).Museums' attendance down 11 percent in 2001.Chicago Sun-Times.
5. Bourdieu, P.,Richard, J. D. (ed.),Nice. R. (Trans.)(1986).Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education.New York:Green Wood Press.
6. Cash, S,Ebony, D.(2005).New Moma Packs 'em in. Art in America.
7. FMGB Guggenheim Bilbao Museoa(2005).Strategic Plan 2005-2008.Bilbao:Guggenheim Bilbao Museoa.
8. FMGB Guggenheim Bilbao Museoa(2005).Memoria 2003-2004 Bienial Report.
9. Johnson, P.,Thomas, B.(1998).The Economics of Museums: A Research Perspective.Journal of Cultural Economics,22(3),73-85.
10. Johnson, P.,Thomas, B.(1998).The Economics of Museums: A Research Perspective.Journal of Cultural Economics,22(2),73-85.
11. Ledes, A. E.(2004).A Museum Expansion in the Midwest.The Magazine Antiques,8-19.
12. Russel, J. H.(2006).PURSUITS; Entertainment & Culture Museums: Attendance Flat. Prices Up.Wall Street Journal,3.
13. Throsby, David(2001).Economics and Culture.Cambridge University.
14. 翁基峰(2003)。古根漢爲畢爾包帶來改變。今藝術雜誌，10，70-73。
15. 翁基峰(2003)。古根漢家族與基金會。今藝術雜誌，8，56-59。
16. 張維倫譯、David Throsby原著(2003)。文化經濟學。臺北:典藏雜誌社。
17. 楊靜姍(2005)。博物館、知識建構與現代性，博物館研究專刊第一號。臺中:國立自然科學博物館。
18. 蔡昭儀(2004)。全球古根漢效應。臺北:典藏藝術家庭。

1. 林明美(2008)。臺灣公立博物館功能趨勢與組織架構初探：以臺北縣四座博物館爲例。博物館學季刊，22(1)，49-75。
2. 田潔菁(2008)。臺灣與英國地方博物館政策探究。博物館學季刊，22(4)，77-89。
3. 田潔菁(2013)。博物館合作網絡實證分析與模型推導。博物館學季刊，27(4)，27-65。
4. (2014)。文化觀光脈絡下的博物館發展趨勢。國立歷史博物館學報，50，106-124。