题名

補助、不補助?-博物館補助的辯論與審思

并列篇名

To Subsidize or Not to Subsidize? Reflections and Debates on the Issue of Museum Subsidies

DOI

10.6686/MuseQ.201007_24(3).0003

作者

林玟伶(Wen-Ling Lin)

关键词

補助政策 ; 文化政策 ; 博物館 ; policy of subsidy ; cultural policy ; museum

期刊名称

博物館學季刊

卷期/出版年月

24卷3期(2010 / 07 / 01)

页次

47 - 59+61

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

從全球博物館發展的角度觀之,隨著各國政府財政緊縮、權力下放等內外變革,致使當代博物館面臨政府補助減少或取消,而須自籌財源的窘境。據此,本研究將藉由討論博物館補助的議題,檢視正反面的爭論,反思博物館在社會的責任與價值,以此思索補助的機制應如何形成。最後指出博物館透過補助,有助於外部利益之產生,同時讓博物館免於財政壓力,能夠穩固研究、典藏、教育及推廣的基本功能,並展現出文化多樣性,同時健全補助機制以及博物館的積極回應,終將有助於創造政府、公民與博物館共同對話的場域。

英文摘要

The museum of the day is facing financial difficulties due to government grant cuts and decentralization. Most museums need to raise funds for their operation / survival. This paper discusses museum subsidy issue by examining the arguments on both positive and negative sides and rethinks the responsibility and value of museums to the society, so as to ponder how the subsidy mechanism was formed. Finally, the study indicates that a subsidy will help a museum display its public benefit and keep it from financial pressure, so that the museum can concentrate on its functions like research, collection, education and promotion as well as on displaying its cultural diversity. Sound subsidy mechanism and active responses from museums will lead to create dialogues among government, citizen and museum.

主题分类 人文學 > 人文學綜合
人文學 > 藝術
参考文献
  1. Sandell, R. (ed.)(2002).Museums and the Combating of Social Inequality: Roles, Responsibilities, Resistance.London:Routledge.
    連結:
  2. 林詠能、林玟伶(2009)。最佳實踐或最低標準:我國博物館認定計畫建置。科技博物,13(3),11-37。
    連結:
  3. Abbing, H.(2002).Why Are Artists Poor? The Exceptional Economy of the Arts.Amsterdam:Amsterdam University Press.
  4. Bailey, S.(1997).Charging for admission to museums and galleries: Arguments and evidence.Museum Management and Curatorship,16(4),355-369.
  5. Bailey, S. J.,Falconer, P.(1998).Charging for admission to museums and galleries: A framework for analyzing the impact on access.Journal of Cultural Economics,22,167-177.
  6. Banfield, E. C.(1984).The Democratic Muse.New York:Basic.
  7. Barker, E.(1999).Exhibiting the canon: The blockbuster show.Contemporary Cultures of Display
  8. Baumol, W. J.,Bowen, W. G.(1966).Performing Arts: The Economic Dilemma.New York:Twentieth Century Fund.
  9. Bennett, T.(2008).Cultural capital, social inequality and cultural policy.The International Forum for Cultural Policy and Capitals of Culture,Taipei:
  10. Bourdieu, P.(1984).Distinction: A Social Critique for the Judgement of Taste.Massachusetts:Harvard University Press.
  11. Bourdieu, P.(1990).Artistic taste and cultural capital.Culture and Society: Contemporary Debates,Cambridge etc:
  12. Bourdieu, P.,Darbel, A.(1991).The Love of Art: European Art Museums and Their Public.Cambridge:Polity Press.
  13. Department for Culture, Media and Sport(2007).Culture and Creativity in 2007.London:DCMS.
  14. Department for Culture, Media and Sport(2005).Understanding the Future: Museums and 21st Century Life-The Value of Museums.London:DCMS.
  15. Evans, G.(2005).Measure for measure: Evaluating the evidence of culture's contribution to regeneration.Urban Studies,42(5/6),959-983.
  16. Frey, B.(1998).Superstar museums: An economic analysis.Journal of Cultural Economics,22(203),13-125.
  17. Gibson, L.(2008).In defence of instrumentality.Cultural Trends,17(4),247-257.
  18. Haag, V. D.(1979).Should the government subsidize the arts?.Policy Review,10,63-73.
  19. Harrison, J. D.(1994).Ideas of museums in the 1990s.Museum Management and Curatorship,13(2),160-176.
  20. Heilbrun, J.,Gray, C. M.(2001).The Economics of Art and Culture.UK:Cambridge University Press.
  21. Holden, J.(2004).Capturing Cultural Value: Howe Culture Has Become a Tool of Government Policy.London:DEMOS.
  22. Hooper-Greenhill, E.(1994).Museums and Their Visitors.London:Routledge.
  23. House of Commons(1989).Certain museums and galleries: Policies on charging for admission, minutes of evidence.Education, Science and Arts Committee, House of Commons, Session 1989-90,London:
  24. Levitt, R.(2008).The political and intellectual landscape of instrumental museum policy.Cultural Trends,17(4),223-231.
  25. Lin, Y. N.(2009).Importance-performance analysis of the Taipei Fine Arts Museum's service.Museum Management and Curatorship,24(2),105-121.
  26. Lorente, P.(ed.)(1996).The Role of Museums and the Arts in the Regeneration of Liverpool.Leicester:University of Leicester.
  27. Merriman, N.(1991).Beyond the Glass Case: The Past, the Heritage and the Public in Britain.Leicester:Leicester University Press.
  28. Miller, T.,Yùdice, G.(2002).Cultural Policy.London:Sage.
  29. Montgomery, J.(2003).Cultural quarters as mechanisms for urban regeneration. Part 1: Conceptualising cultural quarters.Planning, Practice and Research,18(4),293-306.
  30. Moore, T.(1968).Reasons for subsidizing american theater.The Economics of the Arts,London:
  31. Myerscough, J.(1988).The Economic Importance of the Arts in Britain.London:Policy Studies Institute.
  32. O''Hagan, W. J.(1995).National museums: To charge or not to charge?.Journal of Cultural Economics,19,33-47.
  33. Peacock, A. T.(1969).Welfare economics and public subsidies to the Arts.The Economics of the Arts,London:
  34. Santagata, W.(2002).Cultural districts, prooerty rights and sustainable economic growth.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,269(1),9-23.
  35. Scott, C.(2009).Exploring the evidence base for museum value.International Museum Management and Curatorship,24(3),195-212.
  36. Throsby, D.(2001).Economics and Culture.Cambridge University Press.
  37. Travers, T.,Glaister, S.(2004).Valuing Museums: Impact and Innovation among National Museums.UK:National Museum Directors' Conference.
  38. Weil, S. E.(1990).Rethinking the Museum: And Other Meditations.Washington, DC:Smithsonian Institution.
  39. Weil, S. E.(1995).A Cabinet of Curiosities: Inquiries into Museums and Their Prospects.Washington, DC:Smithsonian Institution.
  40. Wittlin, A.(1970).A twelve point program for museum renewal.Reinventing the Museum: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives on the Paradigm Shift
  41. 王淑燕(譯),Jenks, C.(1998).文化.高雄:巨流圖書公司.
  42. 江靜玲譯、Pick, J.(1995)。藝術與公共政策。臺北:桂冠圖書公司。
  43. 袁千雯譯、Strinati, D.(2005)。通俗文化理論。臺北:韋伯文化國際出版有限公司。
  44. 張譽騰(2003)。博物館大勢觀察。臺北:五觀藝術事業有限公司。
  45. 陸民仁譯、Pigou, A. C.(1971)。福利經濟學上冊。臺北:臺灣銀行經濟研究室。
  46. 馮建三譯、Picard, R. G.(1994)。媒介經濟學。臺北:遠流出版社。
  47. 馮建三譯、Webster, F.(1999)。資訊社會理論。臺北:遠流出版社。
  48. 劉新圓(2001)。,財團法人國家政策研究基金會。
  49. 蔡世蓉譯、並木誠士、中川理(2008)。美術館的可能性。臺北:典藏藝術家庭股份有限公司。
  50. 羅世宏譯、Baeker, C.(2004)。文化研究:理論與實踐。臺北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
  51. 嚴玲娟譯、Abbing, H.(2008)。為什麼藝術家那麼窮?。臺北:典藏藝術家庭股份有限公司。
被引用次数
  1. 劉偉傑(2016)。從專業倫理檢視公立博物館與媒體合辦特展之公益表現—以故宮為例。博物館學季刊,30(4),5-29。
  2. 劉偉傑(2017)。我國公立博物館委外特展營運管理機制之探討—以國立故宮博物院為例。博物館學季刊,31(4),41-65。
  3. 邱君妮,林詠能,林玟伶(2019)。以英美日三國博物館補助單位模式看我國未來補助框架建置。博物館學季刊,33(3),5-23。
  4. 徐嘉黛(2022)。意會重塑:博物館服務設計中的導意作法。中山管理評論,30(5),767-807。
  5. 顏上晴,簡郁庭(2021)。博物館文物捐贈動機探析。科技博物,25(3),25-51。
  6. (2016)。博物館數位圖像授權營運模式探析。國立歷史博物館學報,54,136-158。
  7. (2024)。臺灣代表性公立美術館網路行銷策略組合之探討。博物館學季刊,38(1),77-95。