题名

「愛他,不Hot他」全球暖化特展對觀眾知識與態度的影響

并列篇名

The Effects of the "Global Warming, We Care" Exhibition on Visitors’ Knowledge and Attitudes

DOI

10.6686/MuseQ.201201_26(1).0006

作者

黃書涵(Shu-Han Huang);劉德祥(Teh-Ciang Lau)

关键词

博物館教育 ; 展示評量 ; 學習成效 ; 全球暖化 ; 氣候變遷 ; museum education ; exhibition evaluation ; learning outcomes ; global warming ; climate change

期刊名称

博物館學季刊

卷期/出版年月

26卷1期(2012 / 01 / 01)

页次

59 - 85

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

研究欲瞭解全球暖化展示對觀眾知識與態度的影響。研究所選擇的展示為國立自然科學博物館所策劃的「愛他,不hot他-全球暖化與節能減碳巡迴展」。本研究的時間地點為此特展在高雄國立科學工藝博物館巡迴展出時,於2008年7月15日到7月27日期間對332位觀眾進行參觀前後之問卷調查,並以重複測量變異數分析(repeated measures ANOVA)來進行資料分析,其中知識與態度兩個面向(行為意向與危機意識)在參觀展示前後之分數差異力,重複測量變項(repeated measures variable),不同性別與日常環保實踐程度的觀眾為獨立測量變項(independent variables)。研究結果顯示參觀此特展之觀眾年齡多在40歲以下,以專科大學與理工科學類背景最多,且多數原本即高度關注全球暖化議題,具備許多相關知識11日常瓚保實踐程度較高,他們在參觀特展之後,仍能提高其危機意識,鞏固正向的環境態度,唯在知識與行為意向這兩方面提昇則較弱,此結果支持了觀眾在博物館展示中,在情意學習上較成功,在認知部分的學習較小的論點。此外,在知識、行為意向與危機意識的改變與性別及日常環保實踐程度之間並無交互作用關係。然而,性別日常環保實踐程度在行為意向與危機意識改變上有交互作用關係,特別是環保實踐程度低的女性,前後測之行為意向與危機意識平均分數皆低於男性觀眾,但環保實踐程度高的女性觀眾分數卻高於男性觀眾,最後並針對自由選擇的學習環境進行討論建議。

英文摘要

The objective of this study is to determine the effects of a global warming traveling exhibition on visitors’ knowledge of, attitudes toward and risk perception of climate change-related issues. This study was conducted at the National Museum of Science and Technology in Kaohsiung from July 15 to July 27, 2008. Three hundred and thirtytwo visitors participated in this pre- and post-test study. Data analysis was conducted by repeated measures analysis of variance with score changes in knowledge, attitudes, and risk perception indentified as repeated measure variables and gender and levels of daily conservation action indentified as independent variables. The results revealed significant improvement in post-test scores in terms of knowledge, attitudes and risk perception after viewing the exhibit, indicating that the exhibit had a positive effect on visitors. In addition, there were no significant interactions among changes in knowledge, attitudes, and risk perception with gender and level of daily conservation action. However, between-subjects analysis revealed that there were significant two-way interactions among gender and level of daily conservation action with changes in attitudes and risk perception. On average, females with low level of daily conservation action had lower scores than males while females with high level of daily conservation action had higher scores than males. Finally, some issues regarding free-choice learning environment are discussed.

主题分类 人文學 > 人文學綜合
人文學 > 藝術
参考文献
  1. 王啟祥(2008)。博物館觀眾學習成果與影響研究的發展與啟示。博物館學季刊,22(4),91-107。
    連結:
  2. 劉德祥(2005)。博物館觀眾中兩性對展示主題不同的關注程度。博物館學季刊,19(2),7-14。
    連結:
  3. Curry, T. E., Ansolabehere, St. and Herzog, H., 2007. A survey of public attitudes towards climate change and climate change mitigation technologies in the united states: Analyses of 2006 results. Retrieved April 5, 2008, from: http://sequestration.mit.edu/pdf/LFEE_2007_01_WP.pdf
  4. David Heil and Associates, Inc., 2009. Communicating climate change: 2009 audience research results. (Prepared for the Association of Science-Technology Centers with Funding from the National Science Foundation.) Retrieved November 7, 2009, from: http://www.informalscience.org/reports/0000/0211/C3_Y1_AudienceResearchReportFINALOct2009.pdf
  5. The UK Data Archive. 2007. 2007 Survey of Public Attitudes and Behaviours Toward the Environment. London: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. Retrieved April 5, 2008, from: http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/statistics/pubatt/index.htm
  6. 劉德祥,2008b。節能減碳巡迴展企劃書。未出版。
  7. George Mason University. Novelli, P. & Center of Excellence in Climate Change Communication Research. 2008. What are Americans thinking and doing about global warming?-Results of a national household survey. Retrieved April 5, 2008, from: http://www.climatechangecommunication.org/images/files/PN_GMU_ClimateChange_Report.pdf
  8. Adelman, L. M.,Dierking, L. D.,Haley Goldman, K.,Coulson, D.,Falk, J. H.,Adams, M.(2001).,Annapolis, MD:Institute for Learning Innovation.
  9. Adelman, L. M.,Falk, J. H.,James, S.(2000).Impact of national aquarium in Baltimore on visitors' conservation attitudes, behavior, and knowledge.Curator,43(1),33-62.
  10. Brossard, D.,Lewenstein, B.,Bonney, R.(2005).Scientific knowledge and attitude change: The impact of a citizen science.International Journal of Science Education,27(9),1099-1121.
  11. Davis, P.(1996).Museums and the Natural Environment: The Role of Natural History Museums in Biological Conservation.London:Leicester University Press.
  12. Diamond, J.(1999).Practical Evaluation Guide.London:AltaMira Press.
  13. Dierking, L. D.(2007).Evidence and categories of informal science education impacts.A Framework for Evaluating Impacts of Informal Science Education Projects,Washington, DC:
  14. Falk, J. H.,Reinhard, E. M.,Vernon, C. L.,Bronnenkant, K.,Deans, N. L.,Heimlich, J. E.(2007).Why Zoos & Aquariums Matter: Assessing the Impact of a Visit.Association of Zoos & Aquariums.
  15. Garnett, R.(2002).,未出版
  16. Houghton, J. T.(2004).Global Warming: The Complete Briefing.Cambridge University Press.
  17. Kaiser, F. G.,Wölfing, S.,Fuhrer, U.(1999).Environmental attitude and ecological behavior.Journal of Environmental Psychology,19
  18. Kellstedt, P. M.,Zahran, S.,Vedlitz, A.(2008).Personal efficacy, the information environment, and attitudes toward globalwarming and climate change in the united states.Risk Analysis,28(1)
  19. Pallant, J.(2001).SPSS Survival Manual.United Kingdom:Open University Press.
  20. Smith-Sebasto, N. J.(1992).The revised perceived environmental control measure: A review and analysis.The Journal of Environmental Education,23(2)
  21. Storksdieck, M.,Ellenbogen, K.,Heimlich, J. E.(2005).Changing minds? Factors that influence free-choice learning about environmental conservation.Environmental Education Research,11(3),353-369.
  22. Taylor, R.(1993).The influence of a visit on attitude and behavior towards nature conservation.Visitor Studies: Theory, Research and Practice,Jacksonville, Alabama:
  23. Weil, S. E.(2003).Beyond big and awesome : Outcome-based evaluation.Museum News,82(6)
  24. 王啟祥(2004)。博物館觀眾研究知多少。博物館學季刊,18(2),95-104。
  25. 施明發(2001)。建構主義學習理論對於博物館教育的啟示。博物館學季刊,15(1),25-38。
  26. 馬信行(2006)。行為改變的理論與技術。臺北:高等教育出版社。
  27. 楊冠政(1998)。環境教育。臺北:明文出版社。
  28. 趙姿婷(2009)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學環境教育研究所。
  29. 劉德祥(2008)。自然史博物館如何迎接下一個世紀的挑戰。臺灣博物季刊,27(2),62-65。
  30. 蔡喜信(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所。
  31. 鄭鈺燕(2008)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學環境教育研究所。
被引用次数
  1. 蔡俊彥、黃孝宗、黃台珠(2013)。公民科學家意象與參觀博物館對科學研究利益知覺之影響。教育科學研究期刊,58(3),1-22。
  2. (2017)。海外環保教育服務之行動研究:以2014年慈濟川愛志工隊為例。環境教育學刊,15,23-49。