創辦猴硐礦工文史館對高齡礦工生命意義轉化之研究

A Study on the Creation of the Hou-Tong Miners Museum and Its Influences on Elderly Miners' Meaning of Life and Transformative Learning

10.6686/MuseQ.202304_37(2).0001

徐敏雄(Min-Hsiung Hsu)

生態博物館 ； 成功在地老化 ； 礦工 ； eco-museum ； successful aging-in-place ； miners

博物館學季刊

37卷2期（2023 / 04 / 01）

5 - 23

繁體中文;英文

2019年一群高齡礦工創辦了具有生態博物館和創傷博物館精神的「猴硐礦工文史館」，為解創辦文史館對高齡礦工生命意義轉化的影響，本研究採用非結構性訪談法、田野日誌及文件分析法，並以Bourdieu的理論為基礎，釐清這群礦工在不同生涯階段如何受場域規則引導，並運用當下慣習，參酌自己擁有的資本類別與存量，形構各類社會角色的實作策略，以創造自我認同、勞動意義與生存機會。在此同時，也要瞭解各類實作策略對不同生涯階段礦工的慣習、資本及場域規則可能的影響，及其蘊含之成功在地老化意涵。研究結果發現，倘若高齡者生命故事能受到重視，即使身體日益退化，依舊可運用生態博物館和創傷博物館的運作策略，創造正向自我認同、集體認同與地方感，達到成功在地老化理想。

In 2019, a group of elderly miners created the Hou-Tong Miners Museum, which is both an eco-museum and a trauma-informed museum. The aim of this study is to better understand the influences of the creation of this museum on the miners' meaning of life and transformative learning. Data collection methods included unstructured interviews, field study records, and documentary research. With Bourdieu's theories as the foundation, the author sought to clarify how this group of miners were guided by field norms at different stages of their careers. Based on their current habitus, how these miners took stock of the types and inventories of capital belonging to them was analyzed, in addition to how they formed strategies and practices for various social roles, to create a sense of self-identity, meaning to their labor, and opportunities for survival. At the same time, it was necessary to understand the influences of different strategies and practices on the habitus, capital, and field norms of these miners at different stages of their careers, as well as their message of successful aging-in-place. Based on the results of this study, provided that the local life stories of the elderly miners are taken seriously, even in a state of gradual physical deterioration, they are able to use eco-museum and trauma-informed museum operational strategies to develop positive self-identity and collective identity, as well as sense of place, to achieve the ideals of successful aging-in-place.

1. 林佳靜,許世璋(2020)。地方感與環境行為意願之研究：以卑南遺址公園及其周邊在地居民為例。科學教育學刊，28(4)，303-326。
   連結：
2. 林裕強,黃俐芬(2020)。黑金、貓村或存在真實？從後現代觀點探討猴硐之真實性及價值。觀光休閒學報，26(2)，155-178。
   連結：
3. 黃淑玲(2003)。男子性與喝花酒文化：以 Bourdieu 的性別支配理論為分析架構。臺灣社會學，5，73-132。
   連結：
4. 蔡宗雄(2012)。從礦業遺產到生態博物園區：新北市立黃金博物館與金瓜石聚落保存的發展經驗。文化資產保存學刊，22，113-122。
   連結：
5. Arnold-de Simine, S.(2013).Mediating Memory in the Museum: Trauma, Empathy, Nostalgia.Palgrave Macmillan.
6. Atchley, R. C.,Barusch, A. S.(2007).Social Forces and Aging: An Introduction to Social Gerontology.Academic Internet Publishers.
7. Bourdieu, P.,Adamson, M.(Trans.)(1990).In Other Words: Essays Towards a Reflexive Sociology.Polity Press.
8. Bourdieu, P.,Nice, R.(Trans.)(1984).Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
9. Bourdieu, P.,Nice, R.(Trans.)(1990).The Logic of Practice.Polity Press.
10. Bourdieu, P.,Wacquant, J. D.(1992).An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology.Polity Press.
11. Crooke, E.(2015).The “active museum”: How concern with community transformed the museum.The International Handbooks of Museum Studies (Vol. 2): Museum Practice
12. Dovey, K.(2002).The silent complicity of architecture.Habitus: A Sense of Place
13. Finnegan, F.(2014).Embodied experience, transformative learning and the production of space.Spaces of Transformation and Transformation of Space. Proceedings of the 11th International Transformative Learning Conference
14. Hooyman, N. R.,Kiyak, H. A.(2011).Social Gerontology: A Multidisciplinary Perspective.Allyn & Bacon.
15. Kõresaar, E.(2018).Cultural trauma and diversity in museums: A report from São Paulo.Journal of Ethnology and Folkloristics,12(1),95-103.
16. Leach, N.(2002).Belonging: Towards a theory of identification with space.Habitus: A Sense of Place
17. Moody, H. R.,Sasser, J. R.(2012).Aging: Concepts and Controversies.SAGE Publications.
18. Nytagadien, R. L.,Neal, A. G.(2004).Confronting an ugly past.The Journal of American Culture,27(4),375-383.
19. Phillips, J.,Ajrouch, K.,Hillcoat-Nalletamby, S.(2010).Key Concepts in Social Gerontology.SAGE.
20. Richardson, J. G.(Ed.)(1986).Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education.Greenwood Press.
21. Scharlach, A. E.,Lehning, A. J.(2016).Creating Aging-friendly Communities.Oxford University Press.
22. Timothy, D. J.(2011).Cultural Heritage and Tourism: An Introduction.Channel View Publica-tions.
23. Wang, S.(2020).Memorials and memory: The curation and interpretation of trauma narratives-using the examples of exhibitions on the theme of “comfort women” in East Asian Society.Chinese studies in history,53(1),56-71.
24. Yamana, J.(2020).Catastrophe, commemoration and education: On the concept of memory peda-gogy.Educational Philosophy and Theory,52(13),1375-1387.
25. 丁奇芳（譯）,Goodson, I. F.,Gill, S. R.(2011).敘事教育學：生命史取向.臺北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司.
26. 朱侃如（譯）,May, R.(1991).哭喊神話.新北:立緒文化事業有限公司.
27. 吳念真(1994).多桑：吳念真電影劇本.臺北:麥田出版社.
28. 吳震環（譯）,Alexander, J. C.(2003).文化社會學：社會生活的意義.臺北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司.
29. 吳憲坤，2021。寄命｜2020 年猴硐礦工口述歷史影像紀錄。健行科技大學應用空間資訊系。取自 http://www.ag.uch.edu.tw/zh_tw/student/honors/- 紀錄片 - 寄命｜2020 年猴硐礦工口述歷史影像紀錄 -22826074。
30. 周怜利（譯）,Erikson, E. H.,Erikson, J. M.,Kivnick, H. Q.(2000).老年研究報告：人生八大階段.臺中:財團法人張老師基金會.
31. 周章淋(2009).黑金的故鄉：猴硐.新北:新北市文化局.
32. 周朝南,李依倪(2021).黑暗的世界：猴硐礦工回憶錄.新北:周朝南.
33. 邱瑞鑾（譯）,Beauvoir, S.(1970).論老年（第一部）.臺北:漫遊者文化事業股份有限公司.
34. 胡幼慧（編）(1996).質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例.高雄:巨流圖書公司.
35. 張婉真(2014).當代博物館展覽的敘事轉向.臺北:國立臺北藝術大學.
36. 畢恆達(2020).教授為什麼沒告訴我（2020 進化版）.新北:小畢空間出版社.
37. 陳佳利(2007).被展示的傷口：記憶與創傷的博物館筆記.臺北:典藏藝術家庭股份有限公司.
38. 猴硐礦工文史館(2021).跟著礦工爺爺去漫遊.新北:猴硐礦工文史館.
39. 劉鎮輝(2015)。國立臺灣大學。
40. 藍湧棋,黃德昌(2020)。海外礦業尖兵暨礦業耆老訪問：致力於煤礦業文化傳承的礦工周朝南先生。臺灣鑛業，72(2)，48-54。
41. 蘋果新聞網，2020。「人生轉角」礦工的生與死被遺忘，脫褲覽兄弟建文史館。取自https://tw.appledaily.com/micromovie/20200906/4BMPJQG37ZADNEITJIV22MOGWM/。
42. 顧玉玲(2008)。勞動者的血汗印記：工殤紀念碑與歷史記憶。臺灣社會研究季刊，72，229-252。