不同空間阻隔元素對情緒體驗之影響

The Effect of Emotion Experience from Different Enclosed Elements

10.6950/JL.200911.0053

黃憲政(Hsieng-Cheng Huang)；翁珮怡(Pei-Yi Weng)；張俊彥(Chun-Yen Chang)

空間阻隔 ； 情緒體驗 ； 安全性 ； 通透性 ； 偏好 ； enclosure ； emotion experience ； safety ； permeability ； preference

造園景觀學報

15卷3期（2009 / 11 / 01）

53 - 71

繁體中文

本研究針對空間阻隔元素的差異性，來探討其對於受測者情緒體驗的影響。使用的刺激媒體為黑白的手繪線條圖，配合情緒體驗量表來檢視受測者對於空間阻隔元素的情緒體驗。研究中選用磚牆、綠籬、柵欄、混凝土牆為測試的空間阻隔元素，在不同的高度、視覺通透性下測試受測者的情緒體驗，並且檢視不同阻隔元素所帶來的偏好差異與安全性的感受。研究結果顯示不同空間阻隔元素的性質確實會影響情緒體驗、安全感與偏好。而空間阻隔元素的通透性質對於安全感與偏好有顯著影響；植栽綠籬的性質與硬質的磚牆、混凝土牆具有明顯的感受差異。

The study used the different enclosed elements to understand the effect of the participants' emotion experience. Using the black-and-white pictures and an emotional experience scale, the study examined the participants' feeling about the different enclosed elements. The study chose brick wall, hedge, fence, and concrete wall as the enclosed elements. Also, this study used different height and visual permeability of each enclosure picture to find out the difference, and to examine the participants' preference and safety. The results showed that the different enclosed elements indeed make the participants have different feel of emotion experience, preference, and safety. The visual permeability of the enclosure has the effect on the preference and safety; however, the different enclosed elements will affect the participants have different feelings.

1. Appleton, J.(1975).The experience of landscape.New York:Wiley.
2. Atkinson, J. W.,Feather, N. T.(1966).A theory of achievement motivation.New York:John Wiley & Sons, Inc..
3. Mehrabian, A.,Russell, J. A.(1974).An approach to environmental psychology.Carnbridge, MA:The MIT Press.
4. Nelson, T.,Johnson, T.,Strong, M.,Rudakewich, G.(2001).Perception of tree canopy.Journal of Environmental Psychology,21,315-324.
5. Russell, J. A.(1980).A circumplex model ofaffect.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,39,1161-1178.
6. Stamps, A. E.(2005).Visual permeability, locomotive permeability, safety, and enclosure.Environment and Behavior,37(5),587-619.
7. Stamps, A. E.(2005).Enclosure and safety in urbanspaces.Environment and Behavior,37(1),102-133.
8. Stamps, A. E.(2006).Spaciousness and boundary.Environment and Behavior,38(6),841-872.
9. Summit, J.,Sommer, R.(1999).Further studies of preferred tree shape.Environment and Behavior,31(4),550-576.
10. Ulrich, R. S.,I. Altman(Eds.),J. F. Wohlwill(Eds.)(1983).Behavior and the natural environment.New York:Plenum Press.
11. 游恆山譯(2002)。情緒心理學。台北:五南圖書出版有限公司。
12. 賴明嘉(1994)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北，台灣大學園藝研究所。

1. 黃振寧,張伯茹(2021)。都市人行環境空間封閉性對時間知覺之影響。造園景觀學報，25(2)，41-60。
2. 蘇愛媜,連得傑,沈立(2022)。以Instagram照片探討老屋咖啡店視覺元素對情緒體驗及偏好之影響。造園景觀學報，26(1)，1-23。