生活型態與休閒智能、公園使用滿意度關係之研究－以台中市五十歲以上居民為例

The Relationship between Lifestyles and Leisure Resourcefulness, Satisfaction in Park - the Case Study of Elderly Aged Fifty and Over in Taichung City

10.6950/JL.201103.0021

侯錦雄(Jing-Shoung Hou)；郭彰仁(Chang-Jen Kuo)；曾柏勳(Po-Hsun Tseng)

中高齡族群 ； 生活型態 ； 休閒智能 ； 使用滿意度 ； Senior citizens ； Lifestyles ； Leisure resourcefulness ； Satisfaction

造園景觀學報

17卷1期（2011 / 03 / 01）

21 - 39

繁體中文

根據行政院經濟建設委員會預估，台灣高齡人口到2031年會上升到20.07%，趨近於高齡化社會；因此政府公共福利建設與中高齡族群的休閒生活場所如何規劃設計等相關議題便顯得相當重要。相關研究指出提升中高齡族群在生活與遊憩上的活動力及幸福感可增進中高齡族群的健康狀態進而減輕國家財政上的負擔。過去在中高齡族群休閒活動的研究中，多半是針對具有特殊狀況之長者或是以安養院為主題作相關研究，較少提及中高齡族群從事休閒活動所獲得之感受；整體性地探討生活型態、休閒智能及公園使用滿意度的相關研究中，也少有針對中高齡人口所作的相關研究。故本研究為瞭解中高齡族群在從事休閒活動中對於公園環境的感受，選擇以在台中市公園內從事休閒活動之中高齡族群為調查對象，利用結構式問卷進行遊憩行為調查。研究結果發現：1.中高齡族群在生活型態上經由簇群分析後得到四個類群，分別命名為「利益取向型」、「自立務實型」、「休閒享樂型」、「領袖氣息型」。2.休閒智能經因素分析後得到兩個構面，分別為「重視休閒感受」及「重視實質活動」。3.檢定不同的生活型態與休閒智能顯示，中高齡族群的休閒智能會因其生活型態類型不同而有所差異。4.不同生活型態的中高齡族群，在公園的使用滿意度上，如分佈狀況、規劃設計及環境品質的滿意度有顯著差異。

According to the Ministry of the Interior, people aged above 65 years old, effect by the extended average lifespan, have reached to 2343 thousand, 10.2% of gross population, and by 2031, it will increase to 20.07% and have a tendency toward an aging society, estimated by Council for Economic Planning and Development. Issues on related welfare programs and designing of leisure spot for senior citizens have been scrutinized. Researches shows a relief on financial burden by enhancing senior health life and increasing their euphoria. Most of the former studies on their leisure activities have focused on certain specific circumstances and life in rest-home, the feelings obtained from doing them are less concerned, so as the researches on their lifestyle, leisure resourcefulness and satisfaction. In order to understand the feelings they get while doing leisure activities, we took questionnaire in the parks of Taichung city to get the relation between the place they go and the potential needs for it and form a concept of leisure resources of citizens' behavior. The result of study is found：1. Senior citizens' lifestyles can be divided into four groups, each named for: ＂Leaders＂ type, ＂Self-knowing＂ type, ＂Active＂ type and ＂Stubborn＂ type; 2. There were two dimensions to the leisure resourcefulness: feeling of leisure, essential activity; 3. The lifestyles groups have signal difference in the leisure resourcefulness; 4. The lifestyles groups have signal difference in park use satisfaction.

1. 黃章展、李維貞(2006)。生活型態、環境偏好對於遊客住宿基地選擇之影響。戶外遊憩研究，19(2)，63-85。
   連結：
2. 譚大純、陳正男、賴孟寬(2000)。生活型態量表之適合度檢驗、因素重組與趨勢比較：以ICP生活型態量表爲例。調查研究，8，79-102。
   連結：
3. Allan, C.(1981).Measuring Mature Markets.American Demographics,3(3),13-17.
4. Bricker, K.(ed.),Millington, S. J.(ed.)(2005).The relationship among leisure resourcefulness and recreation specialization among a sample of senior adults.Proceedings of the 2004 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium,PA:
5. Burns, R.(ed.),Robinson, K.(ed.)(2007).The Influence of Leisure Resourcefulness and Recreation specialization on Life Satisfaction among a sample of senior adults.Proceedings of the 2006 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium,PA:
6. Dorfman, P. W.(1979).Measurement and meaning of recreation satisfaction: A case study of camping.Environment and Behavior,11(4),483-510.
7. Greyser, S.(ed.)(1963).Toward Scientific Marketing.Chicago:American Marketing Association.
8. Hester, R.(1975).Neighborhood Space.Pennsylvania:Doeden Hutchinson and Ross Inc..
9. Hunt, H. K.(ed.)(1977).The Conceptualization & Measurement of Consumer Satisfaction & Dissatisfaction.Cambridge:MA Marketing Science Institute.
10. Iso-Ahola, S. E.(1980).The social psychology of leisure and recreation.Dubuque, Iowa:Wm. C. Brown Company.
11. Kotler, P.(1988).Marketing management: Analysis, planning and control.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
12. Lazer, W.(1985).Inside the Mature Market.American Demographics,7(2),48-49.
13. Oliver, Richard L.(1981).Measurement and evaluation of satisfaction processes in retail settings.Journal of Retailing,57(3),25-48.
14. Rapoport, R.,Rapoport, R. N.(1975).Leisure and the family life cycle.Boston:Routledge.
15. Seelig, P.(1986).Muppie Market.Incentive Marketing,160(3),34-36.
16. Shoemaker, S.(1989).Segmentation of The Senior Pleasure Travel Market.Journal of Travel Research,27(3),14-21.
17. Wells, D. W.,Tigert, D. J.(1971).Activities, interests & opinions.Journal of Advertising Research,11(4),27-35.
18. Wells, W. D.(ed.)(1974).Life Style and Psychographics.Chicago, IL:American Marketing Assn.
19. Wells, W. D.(ed.)(1974).Lifestyle and psychographics.Chicago, IL:American Marketing Association.
20. 林宗毅(1994)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台中，東海大學企管所。
21. 林婉茹(2007)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。高雄，國立高雄師範大學成人教育研究所。
22. 侯錦雄(1990)。博士論文(博士論文)。台北，台灣大學園藝學研究所。
23. 侯錦雄、姚靜婉(1997)。市民休閒生活態度與公園使用滿意度之相關研究。戶外遊憩研究，10(3)，1-17。
24. 張鍊生(1995)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。新竹，國立交通大學傳研究所。
25. 許忠信(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。高雄，國立高雄師範大學成人教育研究所。
26. 陳勁甫、吳劍秋(2005)。中高齡族群海外旅遊動機與市場區隔之研究。旅遊管理研究，5(1)，1-16。
27. 陳昭蓉、林晏州(1996)。鄰里公園使用者滿意度影響因素之探討。戶外遊憩研究，9(2/3)，1-22。

1. 董孟修(2021)。「穿越時空、漫遊大溪」－木博館「時空旅人」之研究。戶外遊憩研究，34(2)，1-32。
2. 郭彰仁(2015)。比較城鄉居民休閒生活型態、休閒智謀與公園使用參與程度模式之研究。戶外遊憩研究，28(1)，1-29。
3. 郭彰仁、王永勝(2013)。虎尾居民公園使用行為對休閒生活型態、休閒智能及休閒阻礙影響之研究。國立虎尾科技大學學報，31(3)，27-42。