應用支應性理論探討兒童與青少年的遊戲行為－以宜蘭第二文化中心為例

Exploring the Different Play Behavior between Children and Teenagers Based on Affordance Theory-The Case Study in Extreme Sports Area of Yilan Second Cultural Center

林建堯(Chien-Yau Lin)；巫沛臻(Pie-Zehn Wu)；黃郁琇(Yu-Hsiu Huang)

支應性 ； 遊戲理論 ； 社會互動 ； 環境屬性 ； Affordance ； Play Theory ； Social Interaction ； Physical Properties

造園景觀學報

20卷3期（2015 / 03 / 01）

47 - 70

繁體中文

現今台灣戶外遊憩空間很多，然多數混雜了不同性別與年齡層的使用者，造成活動類型間彼此發生衝突。本研究旨在應用支應性理論探討兒童與青少年使用遊憩設施的狀況，以「宜蘭第二文化中心的極限運動場」為研究基地，觀察對象為1-18歲之兒童及青少年。時間為2013年10月至12月間，透過觀察法調查了236位使用者的活動，紀錄包括：環境的物理屬性、使用者屬性和其從事的社會互動與活動類型。結果顯示：不論是社會互動行為或是活動類型，受到年齡的影響皆大於性別的影響。各年齡層行為的差異出現在跑步、溜冰和滑板、攀爬、登高望遠、坐著休息以及溜滑梯中。另外，場域類型確實會影響活動的類型，以整體平坦表面和傾斜平坦表面被感知的支應性類型最多元。

Outdoor recreation space in Taiwan usually causes several conflicts between different kind’s activities due to the different users that have different genders and ages. This research aimed to explore the different play behavior between children and teenager based on affordance theory. The research chooses Extreme sports area of Yilan Second Cultural Center as a site. A total of 236 users, 1-18 years old, was been observation between October to December, 2013. The records including physical properties of environment, background of users, and their social interaction and activities. The results found that age is a major effect factor in the behavior of either social interaction or activities. These differences appeared in the running, skating, climbing, enjoying the scenery, sitting and resting, and sliding. The other result indicated that properties of environment determined the types of activities. The flat surface and inclined flat surface has the most diverse activities.

1. 侯錦雄、程從沛、郭彰仁(2000)。遊戲設施與技術性遊戲行為之關係研究。戶外遊憩研究，13(3)，71-100。
   連結：
2. 歐聖榮、鄭佳美、黃郁琇、林建堯(2010)。以支應性理論探討環境屬性與使用者行為之關係─以國家美術館前開放空間為例。戶外遊憩研究，23(4)，79-109。
   連結：
3. (2002).Children and nature: Psychological, sociocultural, and evolutionary investigations.
4. Allen, E. M.,Hill, A. L.,Tranter, E.,Sheehan, K. M.(2013).Playground Safety and Quality in Chicago.Pediatrics,131,233-241.
5. Aziz, N. F.,Said, I.(2012).The Trends and Influential Factors of Children's Use of Outdoor Environments: A Review.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,38,204-212.
6. Azlina, W.,Zulkiflee, A. S.(2012).A Pilot Study: The Impact of Outdoor Play Spaces on Kindergarten Children.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,38,275-283.
7. Chawla, L.,Heft, H.(2002).Children's competence and the ecology of communities: a functional approach to the evaluation of participation.Journal of Environmental Psychology,22(1-2),201-216.
8. Choi, H. J.,Mark, L. S.(2004).Scaling affordances for human reach actions.Human Movement Science,23(6),785-806.
9. Clark, C.,Uzzell, D. L.(2002).The affordance of the home, neighbourhood, school and town centre for adolescent.Journal of Environmental Psychology,22(1-2),95-108.
10. Clements, R.(2004).An investigation of the status of outdoor play.Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood,5(1),68-80.
11. Esbensen, S. B.(1984).Hidden hazards on playground for children.Hull, PQ:University du Quebeca' Hull.
12. Fjørtoft, I.(2000).Norway, Oslo,Norwegian School of Sport Science.
13. Gibson, J. J.(1979).The ecological approach to visual perception.Boston:Houghton-Mifflin.
14. Gibson, J. J.(1986).The ecological approach to visual perception.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Greeno, J. G.(1994).Gibson's Affordances.Psychological Review,101(2),336-342.
16. Heft, H.(1988).Affordances of children's environments: A functional approach to environmental description.Children's Environments Quarterly,5(3),29-37.
17. Hirose, N.(2002).An ecological approach to embodiment and cognition.Cognitive Systems Research,3(3),289-299.
18. Horelli, L.(1998).Creating Child-Friendly Environments.Childhood,5(2),225-239.
19. Kaarby, K. M. E.(2004).Children playing in nature.CECDE conference: Questions of quality,Dublin:
20. Kyttä, M.(2004).The extent of children's independent mobility and the number of actualized affordances as criteria for childfriendly environments.Journal of Environment Psychology,24,179-198.
21. Kyttä, M.(2002).Affordances of children's environment in the context of cities, small towns, suburbs and rural villages in Finland and Belarus.Journal of Environmental Psychology,22(1-2),109-123.
22. Kyttä, M.(2003).Helsinki University of Technology: Centre for Urban and Regional Studies.
23. Kyttä, M.,Kaaja, M.,Horelli, L.(2004).An internet-based design game as a mediator of children's environmental visions.Environment and Behavior,36(1),127-151.
24. Lester, S.,Russell, W.(2008).Play for a change: play, policy and practice - a review of contemporary perspectives.London:National Children's Bureau.
25. Liebermann, J.(1977).Playfulness: Its relationship to imagination and creativity.New York:Academic Press.
26. Liss, Marsha B.(ed.)(1983).Social and cognitive skills: Sex roles and children's play.New York:Academic Press.
27. McNeilly-Choque, M. K.,Hart, C. H.,Robinson, C. C.,Nelson, L. J.,Olsen, S. F.(1996).Overt and relational aggression on the playground: correspondence among different informants.Journal of Research in Childhood Education,11(1),47-67.
28. Naeini, H. S.,Lindqvist, K.,Jafari, H. R.,Mirlohi, A. H.,Dalal, K.(2011).Playground injuries in children.Open access journal of sports medicine,2,61-68.
29. Nasar, Jack L.(ed.),Preiser, Wolfgang F. E.(ed.)(1999).Directions in Person-Environment Research and Practice.Aldershot:Ashgate.
30. Norman, D. A.(1988).The Psychology of Everyday Things.NY:Basic Books.
31. Olds, A. R.(1989).Psychological and Physiological Harmony in Child Care Center Design.Children's Environment Quarterly,6(4),8-16.
32. Parten, M. B.(1993).Social play among preschool children.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,28,136-147.
33. Sandseter, E. B. H.(2009).Affordances for Risky Play in Preschool: The Importance of Features in the Play Environment.Early Childhood Education Journal,36,439-446.
34. Tizard, B.,Phelps, J.,Plewis, L.(1976).Play in preschool centres (II). Effects onplay of the child's social class and of the educational orientation of the centre.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,17,265-274.
35. Tuan, Y. F.(1974).Topophilia - a study of environmental perception, attitudes, and values.New York:Columbia university press.
36. Warren, W. H.,Whang, S.(1987).Visual guidance of walking through apertures: Body-scaled information for affordances.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,13(3),371-384.
37. 王小璘、毛漢新(2000)。都市公園水景設施之使用後評估－以台中市中山與中正公園為例。東海學報，41(10)，133-147。
38. 吳幸玲(2011)。兒童遊戲與發展。新北市:揚智文化。
39. 李素馨譯、Rutledge, A. J.(1995)。行為觀察與公園設計。台北:田園城市文化事業有限公司。
40. 林晏州、陳惠美(1999)。高雄都會公園使用後之評估。國家公園學報，9(1)，48-64。
41. 陳惠美、凌德麟、王小璘(1996)。鄰里公園使用後評估模式之研究。造園學報，3(1)，21-43。
42. 廖信達(1988)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北，中國文化大學兒童福利研究所。
43. 鄭佳美(2006)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台中，中興大學園藝系研究所。

1. 黃緒庭、黃郁琇、林建堯(2016)。探討兒童遊戲設施對兒童遊戲行為之影響。戶外遊憩研究，29(4)，1-36。