思考與推理適居環境建構之圖像因果實驗室

Thinking and Reasoning a Compatible Environment Construction Using the Approach of the SD Graphic Causal Laboratory

陳美智(Mei-Chih Chen)

因果回饋環路 ； 系統思考 ； 適居環境 ； A causal loop diagram ； system thinking ； a compatible environment

造園景觀學報

21卷2期（2016 / 05 / 01）

73 - 98

繁體中文

適居環境議題在都市發展過程總會受到持續關注與討論，都市需要提供多元功能與適宜的生活條件。但是，許多都市發展問題習慣被用直覺式決策來獲得快速解決；同時，卻產生許多不符合社會多元需求、長期使用等新問題。本文發現系統動態學方法論(System Dynamics, SD)的「因果回饋環路圖(Causal Loops Diagram, CLD)」，其圖像化模式可以聚焦問題、連結社會多元需求的邏輯思考與推理，據以建構「圖像因果實驗室」，做為引導適居環境系統思考的公共論壇輔助工具。實驗室必備的三階段論壇活動是：「直覺」，「因果推理」，及「CLD建模」。本文介紹SD「圖像因果實驗室」課程設計，並以適居環境議題分析在有或無實施「圖像因果實驗室」的系統思考訓練，在思考與推理成果的差異。

A compatible environment is always an issue that has been paid attention to and talked persistently in process of city development. Cities require pluralistic functions and compatible conditions of living. However, there're many problems of city development would be solved by the intuitional decision instantly, and the new problems that are not fit in with the pluralistic demands and long-term use to the community also appeared simultaneously. This study discovers that the graphic model of Causal Loops Diagram (CLD) of System Dynamics (SD) could help to focus problems and have a property of nexus on logistical thinking and reasoning the pluralistic demands of the community. Accordingly, this study makes a SD ＂graphic causal laboratory＂ to be a public forum tool for leading system thinking on issue of a compatible environment. There're three required forum programs on thinking and reasoning in a SD ＂graphic causal laboratory＂, which are the earlier stage of a ＂intuition＂, the middle stage of a ＂causal reasoning＂, and the last stage of a ＂CLD modeling＂. This study introduces the plan for implementing forum programs of ＂graphic causal laboratory＂ on the SD course. This study also analyzes the different results of thinking and reasoning within forum programs that system thinking trains in a SD ＂graphic causal laboratory＂ or none on issue of a compatible environment.

1. 王思峰、黃家齊、陳加屏(2001)。知識型社會中人力資源規劃之權變因素：實驗室實驗研究。管理評論，20(3)，53-83。
   連結：
2. 翁興利、郭香蘭(2010)。M-learning 與員工工作能力關係之研究：系統動態學之觀點。人力資源管理學報，10(2)，27-51。
   連結：
3. 翁興利、郭香蘭(2010)。M-learning 與員工工作能力關係之研究：系統動態學之觀點。人力資源管理學報，10(2)，27-51。
   連結：
4. 屠益民、柯志昌、吳濟華、張鴻斌(2010)。動態系統導向之高雄市水污染治理之研究。中山管理評論，18(3)，863-895。
   連結：
5. 陳映均、林晏州(2014)。都市街道景觀封閉感之研究。都市與計劃，41(1)，99-115。
   連結：
6. 黃幹忠、葉光毅(2008)。行人於台中市一中商圈之路徑選擇行為模式探討。都市與計劃，35(1)，79-98。
   連結：
7. 公視新聞議題中心，(2015a)，頭條：溪洲部落40戶淹毀 史上最大颱風災害，下載日期：2015/08/18，取自：http://pnn.pts.org.tw/main/2015/08/10/溪洲部落40戶淹毀-史上最大颱風災害/。
8. 公視新聞議題中心，(2015c)，焦點議題：我們的島—樹倒，下載日期2015/08/18：http://pnn.pts.org.tw/main/2015/08/16/【我們的島】樹倒/。
9. 台南市政府，(2015)，台南市區域計畫（草案），台南。
10. 李鴻源，(2015)，大愛電視台—人文講堂20150718，台灣災害管理學：走過傷痛—台灣的災害管理，下載日期：2015/08/18取自：https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qiA4V0KYVXU&feature=youtu.be
11. 蔣本基，(2016)，人間福報，人間百年筆陣：省思台南地震災害－加強防災減災教育，下載日期：2016/3/5，取自：http://www.merit-times.com.tw/NewsPage.aspx?unid=430207。
12. 盧貝松(Besson, L.)，(2009)，搶救地球(HOME)，台北：五泰影音出版公司
13. 公視新聞議題中心，(2015b)，焦點議題：我們的島—濁水啟示，下載日期：2015/08/18，取自：http://pnn.pts.org.tw/main/2015/08/17/【我們的島】濁水啟示/。
14. 內政部營建署，(2011)，內政部營建署全球資訊網，法規公告：綜合計畫篇，擬定直轄市縣（市）區域計畫實施要點，下載日期：2015/10/27，取自：http://www.cpami.gov.tw/chinese/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=14255&catid=25&Itemid=100。
15. Ventana Systems (2015). Vensim PLE (Version: 6.3) [Computer Software]. Harvard: Ventana Systems Inc., MA, Retrieved: July 10, 2015, from: http:/vensim.com/freedownload/.
16. Ackoff, R. L.(1994).Systems thinking and thinking systems.System Dynamics Review,10(2-3),175-188.
17. Anderson, J. R.(1993).Problem solving and learning.American Psychologist,48(1),39-41.
18. Aramburo, S. A.,Acevedo, J. A. C.,Morales, Y. O.(2012).Laboratory experiments in the system dynamics field.System Dynamics Review,28(1),94-106.
19. Capra, F.(1994).From the Parts to the Whole: Systems Thinking in Ecology and Education.Berkeley, CA:The Center for Ecoliteracy.
20. Cavaleri, S.,Sterman, J. D.(1997).Towards evaluation of systems thinking interventions: a case study.System Dynamics Review,13(2),171-186.
21. Cavana, R. Y.,Ford, A.(2004).Environmental and Resource Systems: Editors' Introduction.System Dynamics Review,20,89-98.
22. Chan, S. L.,Huang, S .L.(2004).A systems approach for the development of a sustainable community-the application of the sensitivity model (SM).Journal of Environmental Management,72,133-147.
23. Chen, J. H.,Jan, T. S.(2005).A System Dynamics Model of the Semiconductor Industry Development in Taiwan.Journal of the Operational Research Society,56(10),1141-1150.
24. Chen, M. C.,Chang, K.(2014).Reasoning the Causality of City Sprawl, Traffic Congestion, and Green Land Disappearance in Taiwan Using the CLD Model.International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,11(11),11464-11480.
25. Churchman, C. W.(1984).The systems approach.New York:Dell Publish.
26. Coyle, G.,Exelby, D.(2000).The Validation of Commercial System Dynamics Models.System Dynamics Review,16(1),27-41.
27. Coyle, R. G.(1996).System Dynamics Modeling: A Practical Approach.New York:Chapman & Hall.
28. Doyle, J. K.,Ford, D. N.(1998).Mental Models Concepts for System Dynamics Research.System Dynamics Review,14,3-29.
29. Forrester, J. W.(1961).Industrial dynamics.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
30. Forrester, J. W.(1973).World Dynamics.Cambridge, MA:Wright-Allen Press.
31. Forrester, J. W.(1969).Urban Dynamics.Waltham, MA:Pegasus Communications.
32. Forrester, J. W.,Senge, P. M.(1980).Tests for Building Confidence in System Dynamics Models.Time Studies in the Management Sciences,14,209-228.
33. Graham, A. K.,Senge, P. M.(1990).Computer-based case study and learning laboratory projects.System Dynamics Review,6(1),100-105.
34. Guo, H. C.,Liu, L.,Huang, G. H.,Fuller, G. A.,Zou, R.,Yin, Y. Y.(2001).A system dynamics approach for regional environmental planning and management: A study for the Lake Erhai Basin.Journal of Environmental Management,61(1),93-111.
35. Jacobs, J.(1961).The Death and Life of Great American Cities.New York:Random House.
36. Jan, C. G.(2003).Policies for developing defense technology in newly industrialized countries: a case study of Taiwan.Technology in Society,25(3),351-368.
37. Jan, T. S.,Jan, C. G.(2000).Designing Simulation Software to Facilitate Learning of Quantities System Dynamics Skill: A Case Study in Taiwan.Journal of the Operational Research Society,51(4),1409-1419.
38. Khan, S.,Yufeng, L.,Ahmad, A.(2009).Analysing complex behaviour of hydrological systems through a system dynamics approach.Environmental Modelling & Software,24,1363-1372.
39. Kunc, M.(2008).Using systems thinking to enhance strategy maps.Management Decision,46(5),761-778.
40. Kunc, M.(2012).Teaching strategic thinking using system dynamics: lessons from a strategic development course.System Dynamics Review,28(1),28-45.
41. Lane, D. C.(1992).Modelling as learning: A consultancy methodology for enhancing learning in management teams.European Journal of Operational Research,59(1),64-84.
42. Maani, K. E.(2004).Links between systems thinking and complex decision making.System Dynamics Review,20(1),21-48.
43. Martinez-Moyano, I. J.,Richardson, G. P.(2013).Best practices in system dynamics modeling.System Dynamics Review,29(2),102-123.
44. Meadows, D. H.,Meadows, D. L.,Randers, J.(1992).Beyond the Limits: Confronting Global Collapse, Envisioning a Sustainable Future.Post Mills, VT:Chelsea Green.
45. Meadows, D. H.,Meadows, D. L.,Randers, J.,Behrens, W. W., III(1972).The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome's Project on the Predicament of Mankind.New York:Universe Books.
46. Meadows, D. H.,Robinson, J.(2002).The Electronic Oracle: Computer Models and Social Decisions (excerpt).System Dynamics Review,18(2),271-308.
47. Milling, P. M.(2002).Understanding and Managing Innovation Processes.System Dynamics Review,18(1),73-86.
48. Morecroft, J. D. W.,Sterman, J.(1994).Modeling for Learning Organizations.New York:Productivity Press.
49. Morgan, G.(1983).Rethinking Corporate Strategy: A Cybernetic Perspective.Human Relations,36(4),345-360.
50. Nuhoğlu, H.(2010).The effect of the system dynamics approach on understanding causal relationship skills in science education.Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences,2,3614-3618.
51. Parayil, G.,Sreekumar, T. T.(2004).Industrial Development and the Dynamics of Innovation in Hong Kong.International Journal of Technology Management,27(4),369-392.
52. Qudrat-Ullah, H.(2010).Perceptions of the effectiveness of system dynamics-based interactive learning environments: An empirical study.Computers & Education,55,1277-1286.
53. Richmond, B.(1994).Systems Thinking/System Dynamics: Let's Just Get on with It.System Dynamics Review,10(2-3),135-157.
54. Roberts, E. B.(ed.)(1978).Managerial Applications of System Dynamics.Williston, VT:Pegasus Communications.
55. Rosenthal, A. T.(2003).Teaching systems thinking and practice through environmental art.ETHICS & THE ENVIRONMENT,8(1),153-168.
56. Senge, P. M.(1992).The Fifth Discipline: The Art & Practice of the Learning Organization.Sydney:Random House.
57. Senge, P. M.,Cambron-McCabe, N.,Lucas, T.,Smith, B.,Dutton, J.(2012).Schools that learn: A fifth discipline fieldbook for educators, parents, and everyone who cares about education.New York:Doubleday.
58. Senge, P. M.,Kliener, A.,Roberts, C.,Ross, R. B.,Smith, B.(1994).The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook: Strategies and Tools for Building a Learning Organization.New York:Doubleday.
59. Southworth, M.(2005).Designing the walkable city.Journal of Urban Planning and Development,131(4),246-257.
60. Stave, K. A.(2002).Using system dynamics to improve public participation in environmental decisions.System Dynamics Review,18(2),139-167.
61. Sterman, J. D.(2000).Business dynamics: systems thinking and modeling for a complex world.Boston:Irwin McGraw-Hill.
62. Sweeney, L. B.,Sterman, J. D.(2007).Thinking about systems: student and teacher conceptions of natural and social systems.System Dynamics Review,23(2-3),285-312.
63. Thurston, W. P.(1994).On Proof and Progress in Mathematics.Bulletin (New Series) of the American Mathematical Society,30(2),161-177.
64. Veel, L.,Bredhauer, M.(2009).'Living Local, Thinking Global': Creating and Sustaining Pedagogies.International Journal of Learning,16(9),597-610.
65. Wallen, Ruth(2012).Ecological Art: A Call for Visionary Intervention in a Time of Crisis.Leonardo,45(3),235-242.
66. 王友龍(2012)。會圖解思考的人最厲害。台北:臉譜出版/城邦文化。
67. 王怡舜、湯宗益(2000)。企業總體經濟環境決策支援之研究以系統動力學為建模方法。中華管理評論，3(4)，67-82。
68. 王承豪譯、Connor, J. O'、McDermott, I.(1999)。系統思考實用手冊。台北:世茂。
69. 王思峰(1994)。博士論文(博士論文)。高雄，中山大學企業管理研究所。
70. 王思峰(1994)。動態複雜案例之處方性實驗研究─管理學習實驗室、系統思考、績效與學習不對稱。中山管理評論，2(3)，97-122。
71. 余民寧(1997)。有意義的學習－概念構圖之研究。台北:商鼎文化出版社。
72. 吳瓊恩(1996)。決策問題與決策者的思維傾向。中國行政評論，5(2)，1-36。
73. 李國偉(2000)。證明的流變：一個數學哲學與數學史的綜合觀察。台灣哲學研究，3，1-22。
74. 汪維揚(2001)。博士論文(博士論文)。高雄，國立中山大學資訊管理學系研究所。
75. 林文川(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。高雄，國立中山大學教育研究所。
76. 林肇志(2010)。博士論文(博士論文)。台南，國立成功大學都市計劃研究所。
77. 侯漢君(1998)。系統動態的決策模式：以土地規劃為例。行政學報，29，151-212。
78. 高一中譯、Meadows, D.、Randers, J.、Meadows, D.(2007)。成長的極限：三十週年最新增訂版。台北:臉譜。
79. 屠益民(1996)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告,行政院國家科學委員會。
80. 張象樞(2001)。關於可持續發展研究的系統思考。中國人口、資源與環境，11(2)，6-9。
81. 郭進隆譯、齊若蘭譯、Senge, P. M.(2010)。第五項修練：學習型組織的藝術與實務。台北:天下遠見。
82. 陶在樸(1999)。系統動態學─直擊第五項修鍊奧秘。台北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
83. 詹秋貴(2000)。博士論文(博士論文)。新竹，國立交通大學經營管理研究所。
84. 齊柏林(2013)。我的心，我的眼，看見台灣。台北:圓神出版社。
85. 齊柏林(2006)。從空中看台灣—齊柏林空中攝影集。台北:貓頭鷹出版社。
86. 齊若蘭譯、Gore, A.(2013)。驅動大未來：牽動全球變遷的六個革命性巨變。台北:天下文化。
87. 蔡雅泰(2006)。博士論文(博士論文)。高雄，國立高雄師範大學教育學系。
88. 謝長宏(1987)。系統動態學－理論、方法與應用。台北:中興管理顧問公司。