题名

農村牆面彩繪對農村意象與環境美質之影響研究

并列篇名

The Influence of Wall Painting on Image and Environmental Aesthetics of Rural Areas

作者

張淑貞(Shu-Chen Chang)；邱延貞(Yen-Chen Chiu)

关键词

社區營造 ； 彩繪村 ； 壁畫 ； Extensive green roof ； Irrigation ； Solar panel ； Vegetation height

期刊名称

造園景觀學報

卷期/出版年月

25卷2期（2021 / 08 / 01）

页次

1 - 17

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

近十多年來，台灣在相關計畫的推動及媒體報導效應下，許多農村相繼以彩繪來進行環境營造，彩繪雖讓不少社區爆紅成為熱門景點，但同時也引發了彩繪內容偏離了社區的特色、忽略地方文化、缺乏環境美學思考等批評聲浪。鑑此，本研究主要目的是探討農村牆面彩繪對農村意象與環境美質之影響。本研究將農村彩繪類型分為「3D互動式彩繪」、「原創插畫彩繪」、「卡通動漫彩繪」與「農村風景彩繪」等四類，並以廣泛拍攝方式收集台灣中南部農村牆面彩繪照片，最終選定32張照片作為正式受測照片（每種彩繪類型各8張），並請受測者觀看照片後填答其對農村意象與環境美質之感知。受測樣本收集採用網路及傳統問卷調查，有效樣本共476份（網路236份、現場240份）。本研究結論：（1）紅磚牆面應保留原貌即可呈現農村意象與環境美質，較不適合加以彩繪；水泥牆面則可適度加以彩繪，但彩繪內容應與農村風貌或在地人文有關，並且注意繪製技巧與品質。（2）彩繪類型中以「農村風景彩繪」最能同時展現具農村意象與環境美質，而「卡通動漫彩繪」則是農村意象與環境美質均偏低的類型。
英文摘要

Under the promotion of relevant government projects and the effect of media reports, many rural villages have successively used colorful paintings to create the environment in Taiwan over the past decade. Although these colorful paintings have made many communities become popular attractions, it has also triggered criticisms that the content of colorful paintings deviates from the characteristics of the community, ignores local culture, and lacks environmental aesthetics. Thus, the main purpose of this research is to explore the influence of rural wall painting on image of rural area and environmental aesthetics. Our research divides the types of rural paintings into 4 categories: ＂3D interactive painting＂, ＂original illustration painting＂, ＂cartoon animation painting＂ and ＂rural landscape painting＂, and collects pictures of rural wall paintings in central and southern Taiwan through a wide range of photography methods. Finally, we select 32 photos as the official test photos (8 for each type of painting) for the subjects to fill in their perception of image and environmental aesthetics of rural areas after viewing the photos. The samples are from the Internet and questionnaire surveys, and we obtain a total of 476 valid samples (236 online and 240 on-site). The result mainly shows: (1) The red brick wall surface should retain its original appearance to show the rural image and environmental aesthetics, and it is less suitable for painting; the concrete wall can be painted moderately, but the content should be related to the rural style or local culture, and pay attention to the painting skills and quality. (2) Among the types of painting, ＂rural landscape painting＂ can mostly show rural image and environmental aesthetics at the same time, while ＂cartoon animation painting＂ is a type with low rural image and environmental aesthetics.
主题分类 人文學 > 地理及區域研究
工程學 > 市政與環境工程
参考文献
  1. 李素馨(1999)。都市視覺景觀偏好研究。都市與規劃，26(1)，19-40。
    連結：
  2. 周鴻祥(2006)。塗鴉藝術創作觀念之探討。藝術學報，78，57-78。
    連結：
  3. 游森期,余民寧(2006)。網路問卷與傳統問卷之比較：多樣本均等性方法學之應用。測驗學刊，53(1)，103-128。
    連結：
  4. Abel, E. L.,Buckley, B. E.(1977).The Handwriting On The Wall: Toward A Sociology And Psychology Of Graffiti.Westport, CT:Greenwood Press.
  5. Angileri, V.,Toccolini, A.(1993).The assessment of visual quality as a tool for the conservation of rural landscape diversity.Landscape and Urban Planning,24,105-112.
  6. Arriaza, M.,Cañas-Ortega, J. F.,Cañas-Madueño, J. A.,Ruiz-Aviles, P.(2004).Assessing the visual quality of rural landscapes.Landscape and Urban Planning,69,115-125.
  7. Blanché, U.(2015).Street art and related terms - discussion and working definition.Street Art & Urban Creativity Scientific Journal,1(1),32-39.
  8. Dearden, P.(1984).Factors influencing landscape preference: an empirical investigation.Landscape Planning,11(1),293-306.
  9. Dobni, D.,Zinkhan, G. M.(1990).In search of brand image: a foundation analysis.Advances in Consumer Research,17(1),110-119.
  10. Gartus, A.,Klemer, N.,Leder, H.(2015).The effects of visual context and individual differences on perception and evaluation of modern art and graffiti art.Acta Psychologica,156,64-76.
  11. Haworth, B.,Bruce, E.,Iveson, K.(2013).Spatio-temporal analysis of graffiti occurrence in an inner-city urban environment.Applied Geography,38,53-63.
  12. Heilig, M. L.(1992).El Cine del Futuro: The Cinema of the Future.Presence,1(3),279-294.
  13. Herzog,T. R.,Flynn-Smith, J. A.(2001).Preference and perceived danger as a function of the perceived curvature, length, and width of urban alleys.Environment and Behavior,33(5),653-666.
  14. Howorth, L.(1989).Graffiti.Handbook Of American Popular Culture,New York:
  15. Koolhaas, J., & Urhahn, D. (2014). How Painting Can Transform Communities. TED Global. Retrieved May. 28, 2021 from https://www.ted.com/talks/haas_hahn_how_painting_can_transform_communities /transcript
  16. Lien, J. N.,Buhyoff, G. J.(1986).Extension of visual quality models for urban forest.Journal of Environmental Management,22(3),245-254.
  17. Makino, K.(2018).An empirical research framework for the aesthetic appreciation of the urban environment.City, Culture and Society,1,1-7.
  18. Mazuryk, T., Gervautz, M.(1999).Virtual Reality-History, Applications, Technology and Future.Vienna:Institute of Computer Graphics Vienna University of Technology.
  19. Meiboudi, H.,Karimzadegan, H.,Khalilnejad, S. M. R.(2011).Enhancing children's environmental awareness in kindergarten of Mashhad city using mural painting.Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,28,1020-1028.
  20. Merrill, P. F.,Hammons, K.,Vincent, B. R.,Reynolds, P. L.,Christensen, L. B.(1996).Computer In Education.Boston:Allyn & Bacon.
  21. Nasar, J. L.(1984).Visual preferences in urban street scenes-A cross-cultural comparison between Japan and the United Stater.Environment and Behavior,15,79-93.
  22. Nasar, J. L.,Hong, X.(1999).Visual preferences in urban signscapes.Environment and Behavior,31(5),671-691.
  23. Phillips, S. A.(1996).Graffiti.The Dictionary Of Art,New York:
  24. Placido, M. M.(2015).Manchester, UK,The University of Manchester.
  25. Rapoport, A.(1982).Human Aspects of Urban Form：Toward a man-environment approach to urban form and design.New York:Pergamon Press.
  26. Schauman, S.(1988).Countryside scenic assessment: Tool and application.Landscape and Urban Planning,15,227-239.
  27. Sepänmaa, Y.(1993).The Beauty of Environment： A General Model for Environmental Aesthetics.Denton, Texas:Environmental Ethics Books.
  28. Shafer, E. L.,Hamilton, J. F., Jr.,Schmidt, E. A.(1969).Natural landscape preferences: A predictive model.Journal of Leisure Research,1(1),11-19.
  29. Sheet, V. L.,Manzer, C. D.(1991).Affect, cognition, and urban vegetation: some effects of adding trees along city streets.Environment and Behavior,23(3),285-304.
  30. 余雪蘭，(2015)，自由時報，2015/1/9，〈中部〉農村彩繪夯文化界發起護牆運動，2016/12/16查詢https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/local/paper/845878
  31. 吳珮瑛(2005)。農村景觀及文化資產，農業資源。台灣農家要覽：綜合篇，台北:
  32. 李奕興(2010)。台灣傳統建築彩繪。台灣文獻季刊，61(2)，291-318。
  33. 李素馨(2002)。農村道路景觀之。造園季刊，42，49-58。
  34. 林文毅(2003)。台中，東海大學景觀研究所。
  35. 林怡君(2017)。台南，南台科技大學財經法律研究所。
  36. 侯錦雄(1994)。鄉村景觀變遷之研究－錦水村山地聚落景觀評估。東海學報，35，59-76。
  37. 施纓貞(1998)。台中，逢甲大學建都所。
  38. 洪飛碩(2005)。屏東，國立屏東科技大學農村規劃研究所。
  39. 胡家璇（譯）,Lynch, Kevin(2014).城市的意象.台北:遠流出版.
  40. 范淑勤(2015)。高雄，樹德科技大學建築與室內設計研究所。
  41. 孫洪波(2010)。當代中國本土主流動漫插畫風格探析。藝生活•文海藝苑，12，151-154。
  42. 徐素霞(1996)。插畫是獨立而完整的藝術。雄獅美術月刊，302
  43. 張淑貞(2011)。觀賞者對農村道路景觀之認知。造園景觀學報，17(2)，1-22。
  44. 張雅惠（編譯）,金美理,崔甫尹(2011).魅力都市心設計：建築再造與空間規劃的完美展現.新北市:博誌文化股份有限公司出版.
  45. 曹正(2007).視覺景觀理論.台北:太倉規劃顧問有限公司.
  46. 梁大慶,郭漢皇,林冠宏(2015)。互動式社區藝術之遊憩體驗與滿意度關係：以屋頂上的貓為例。農業推廣文彙，60，127-154。
  47. 許力方，(2016)，ETtoday 東森新聞雲，2016/11/29，東引聚落變北歐？老石頭屋漆成彩色馬祖人哭：我的老家，2016/11/20查詢https://www.ettoday.net/news/20161129/820441.htm
  48. 游昇俯，(2016)，udn聯合新聞網，2016/5/23，我們為何缺乏美感素養？ 五問美感教育，2016/12/16查詢https://udn.com/news/story/8830/1697611
  49. 楊鎮宇，(2015)，上下游News&Market新聞市集，2015/1/6，農村再生彩繪瘋卡通人物智財局：可能侵害著作權社造效果正反看法不一，2016/12/16查詢https://www.newsmarket.com.tw/blog/63666/
  50. 楊寶儀(2016)。中國廣州市，華南農業大學。
  51. 廖方瑜,孟成瀚(2005).塗鴉城市糖果地圖.台北:田園城市.
  52. 蔡雅蘋(2016)。屏東，大仁科技大學文化創意產業研究所碩士在職專班。
  53. 鍾偉愷,賴怡君,吳佳容,陳思宇(2009)。臺灣風景繪畫與攝影之分析。圖文傳播學報，43-50。
  54. 魏意雯(2016)。壁畫造鎮的美麗與哀愁-以台灣彩繪村為例。創作與評論，10，124-126。
  55. 蘇翊傑(2017)。彰化，建國科技大學創意生活應用設計研究所。
print cancel