心理空間理論與《莊子》不為官寓言的隱喻分析

Mental Space Theory and the Metaphors of Refusing Official Positions in the Fables of Zhuangzi

10.6710/JTLL.201710_12(2).0001

張榮興(Jung-hsing CHANG)

心理空間理論 ； 隱喻 ； 框架理論 ； 莊子 ； Mental Space Theory ； metaphor ； frame theory ； Zhuangzi

臺灣語文研究

12卷2期（2017 / 10 / 01）

161 - 185

繁體中文

本文以心理空間理論為基礎，結合了框架理論和反義詞彙關係概念，以《莊子》三則不為官的故事隱喻為例來討論莊子如何運用隱喻的方法表達他不為官的意念選擇。透過框架理論和反義詞彙關係概念，我們得以將相關但未出現在篇章中的語意成分誘導出來，與不同心理空間中的語意成分相對比，進而與目標域的語意成分相映射，將未出現在字裡行間的隱喻結構有系統地呈現出來，作為隱喻詮釋的依據，使讀者能清楚觀察到篇章中語意的融合現象，並理解隱喻產生的背後認知機制。

This paper discusses the metaphors regarding the refusal of being an official in Zhuangzi within the framework of Mental Space Theory. It has been shown how frame theory is capable of evoking relevant semantic elements that are not explicitly mentioned in the discourse and how the lexical relation of antonyms evokes the contrastive associated information in different mental spaces. The way of how the evoked semantic elements in the source domain are mapped into those in the target domain illustrates how metaphorical meanings are generated. From our analysis, the readers are able to see how the meanings from different mental spaces are blended in the interpretation of the metaphors and what cognitive mechanisms are associated with those interpretations.

1. 吳佩晏、張榮興(2010)。心理空間理論與《論語》中的隱喻分析。華語文教學研究，7(1)，97-124。
   連結：
2. Barcelona, Antonio(ed.)(2000).Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective.Berlin:Mouton de Gruyter.
3. Cole, Roger W.(ed.)(1977).Current Issues in Linguistic Theory.Bloomington:Indiana University Press.
4. Croft, William,Cruse, D. Alan(2004).Cognitive Linguistics.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
5. Deignan, Alice(2005).Metaphor and Corpus Linguistics.Amsterdam:John Benjamins.
6. Fauconnier, Gilles(1994).Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
7. Fauconnier, Gilles(1997).Mappings in Thought and Language.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
8. Fauconnier, Gilles,Turner, Mark(2002).The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind's Hidden Complexities.New York:Basic Books.
9. Fillmore, Charles J.(1985).Frames and the semantics of understanding.Quaderni di Semantica,6(2),222-254.
10. Gibbs, Raymond W.(1994).The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language and Understanding.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
11. Goldberg, Adele E.(ed.)(1996).Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language.Stanford:CSLI Publications.
12. Johnson, Mark(1987).The Body in the Mind.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
13. Lakoff, George,Johnson, Mark(1980).Metaphors We Live By.Chicago::University of Chicago Press.
14. Ortony, Andrew(ed.)(1993).Metaphor and Thought.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
15. Saeed, John I.(2009).Semantics.Oxford:Wiley-Blackwell.
16. Stefanowitsch, Anatol(ed.),Gries, Stefan Th(ed.)(2006).Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy.New York:Mouton de Gruyter.
17. Ungerer, Friedrich,Schmid, Hans-Jörg(2006).An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics.New York:Pearson Education Limited.
18. 王熙元(1981)。論語通釋。臺北:臺灣學生書局。
19. 張榮興、黃惠華(2005)。心理空間理論與「梁祝十八相送」之隱喻研究。語言暨語言學，6(4)，681-705。
20. 張榮興、黃惠華(2006)。從心理空間理論看「最短篇」小說中之隱喻。華語文教學研究，3(1)，117-133。
21. 曹礎基(2007)。莊子淺注。北京:中華書局。
22. 郭慶藩(2001)。莊子集釋。臺北:頂淵出版社。
23. 陳鼓應註譯(1999)。莊子今註今譯修訂本。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。
24. 趙家棟(2008)。張恒君、荊貴生《訓詁三則》辨正。漢字文化，2008(3)，68-70。

1. (2023)。夢、隱喻與思想：從意象基模解析《列子．周穆王篇》之夢寓及篇章意旨。嶺南學報，20，37-70。