早期閩南戲文中「當下」語詞和其他功能詞的互動

Now-Denoting Expressions in Tandem with Functional Categories in Early Southern Min Playscripts

10.6710/JTLL.202004_15(1).0002

連金發(Chinfa LIEN)

明清戲文 ； 句法 ； 語意 ； 閩南語 ； 當下 ； Ming/Qing playscripts ； syntax ； semantics ； Southern Min ； now

臺灣語文研究

15卷1期（2020 / 04 / 01）

41 - 75

繁體中文

本文從語意詮釋和句法結構兩方面探討明清時期閩南戲文《荔鏡記》／《荔枝記》表示「當下」的語詞。「當下」界定為發話者說話的時刻，做為直指的核心（origo）。表當下的時間詞只能出現於情態、否定、疑問、語態、假設等功能範疇之前。本文接著考察當下的時間詞和人稱代詞及有指代功能的稱謂語的相對語序。表當下的「今」和代詞的先後搭配關係反映出第三人稱多於第一、二人稱；而代詞和「今」的先後搭配關係則得出第一人稱依序多於第二人稱和第三人稱的關係。功能範疇中句標詞組除了語氣（mood）所涵蓋各種句式外，在其上還有言外言談層，反映交談者的互動，而當下所提供的時間座標與此正相契合。當下詞語也發展出會話含意的功能。此外，當下發生的事件常涉及呼語，因此本文也附帶討論了呼語結構的用法特徵。

The paper examines the expressions denoting now in Lìjìng Jì and Lìzhī Jì, Ming and Qing playscripts, in terms of semantic interpretation and syntactic structure. They provide the temporal anchor for the sentences featuring the interaction of interlocutors in speech events. Now involving indexicality is defined as the moment at which the speaker speaks. The temporal expressions denoting now is construed as the origo of a speech event at the top level of TP, and they are found to scope over other functional categories. On the grounds that the current speech event involves the interaction between speaker and addressee, an examination of the data shows the relative order of Now-expressions and pronouns and terms of address carrying pronominal functions. I also touch on the conversational implicature of the now-denoting expressions and the role of vocatives in the interaction of interlocutors in speech events.

1. 連金發(2015)。人稱代詞稱謂語的活用─說曹操曹操就到。華語文教學研究，12(2)，31-50。
   連結：
2. Abraham, Werner(2012).Traces of Bühler’s semiotic legacy in modern linguistics.Modality and Theory of Mind Elements Across Languages,Berlin:
3. Benveniste, Émile,Meek, Mary Elizabeth(Trans.)(1974).Problems in General Linguistics.Coral Gables, Florida:University of Miami.
4. Bianchi, Valentina(2006).On the syntax of personal arguments.Lingua,116,2023-2067.
5. Brown, Roger,Gilman, Albert(1983).The pronouns of power and solidarity.Language and Social Context: Selected Readings,Harmondsworth:
6. Cinque, Guglielmo(1999).Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
7. Coniglio, Marco(2012).Modal particles, speaker-hearer links, and illocutionary force.Modality and Theory of Mind Elements across Languages,Berlin:
8. Coniglio, Marco,Zegrean, Iulia(2012).Splitting up force: Evidence from discourse particles.Main Clause Phenomena: New Horizons,Amsterdam:
9. Douglas, Rev. Cartairs. 1873. Chinese-English Dictionary of the Vernacular or Spoken Language of Amoy with the Principal Variations of the Chang-chew and Chin-chew Dialects. London: Trubner and Co.
10. Grice, H. Paul(1975).Logic and conversation.Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3: Speech Acts,New York:
11. Harley, Heidi,Ritter, Elizabeth(2002).Person and number in pronouns: A feature-geometric analysis.Language,78,482-526.
12. Hill, Virginia(2013).Features and strategies: The internal syntax of vocative phrases.Vocative!: Addressing between System and Performance,Berlin:
13. Hill, Virginia(2014).Vocatives: How Syntax Meets with Pragmatics.Leiden:Brill.
14. Hill, Virginia(2007).Vocatives and the pragmatics-syntax interface.Lingua,117,2077-2105.
15. Jakobson, Roman(1990).Shifters and verbal categories.On Language,Cambridge, Massachusetts:
16. Lien, Chinfa(2002).Grammatical function words 乞, 度, 共, 甲, 將 and 力 in Li4 Jing4 Ji4 荔鏡記 and their development in Southern Min.Papers from the Third International Conference on Sinology: Linguistic Section. Dialect Variations in Chinese,Taipei:
17. Matushansky, Ora,Marantz, Alec(2013).Distributed Morphology Today: Morphemes for Morris Halle.Cambridge, Massachusetts:The MIT Press.
18. Puglielli, Annarita,Frascarelli, Mara(2011).Linguistic Analysis: From Data to Theory.Berlin:Walter de Gruyter.
19. Rizzi, Luigi(1997).The fine structure of the left periphery.Elements of Grammar: Handbook in Generative Syntax,Dordrecht:
20. Silverstein, Michael(1986).Hierarchy of features and ergativity.Features and Projections,Berlin:
21. Silverstein, Michael(1976).Hierarchy of features and ergativity.Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages,Canberra:
22. Speas, Peggy,Tenny, Carol(2003).Configurational properties of point of view roles.Asymmetry in Grammar, Vol. 1: Syntax and Semantics,Amsterdam:
23. Stowell, Tim(2012).Syntax.Oxford Handbook and Tense and Aspect,Oxford:
24. Wiltschko, Martina(2014).The Universal Structure of Categories: Towards a Formal Typology.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
25. Zagona, Karen(1990).Times as temporal argument structure.conference Time in Language,Cambridge, Massachusetts:
26. 丁聲樹. 1943.〈「何當」解〉。《歷史語言研究所集刊》11: 449-463。
27. 江藍生(1990)。疑問副詞「可」 探源。古漢語研究，8，44-50。
28. 江藍生,曹廣順(1997).唐五代語言詞典.上海:上海教育出版社.
29. 吳守禮（校註）(2001).明萬曆刊荔枝記戲文校理.台北:從宜工作室.
30. 吳守禮（校註）(2001).清順志刊荔枝記戲文校理.台北:從宜工作室.
31. 吳守禮（校註）(2001).明嘉靖刊荔鏡記戲文校理.台北:從宜工作室.
32. 吳守禮（校註）(2001).清光緒刊荔枝記戲文校理.台北:從宜工作室.
33. 呂叔湘,江藍生（補）(1985).近代漢語指代詞.上海:學林出版社.
34. 志村良治,江藍生（譯）,白維國（譯）(1995).中國中世語法史研究.北京:中華書局.
35. 泉州市文化局泉州地方戲曲研究社(2010).荔鏡記荔枝記四種‧第三種：清代道光刊本《荔枝記》書影及校訂本.北京:中國戲劇出版社.
36. 連金發(2013)。明嘉靖本荔鏡記稱謂語稱代詞用法探索：從語體角度入手。當代修辭學，175，72-79。
37. 連金發(2011)。閩南語「敢」的探索：兼論功能範疇的階層性。中國語言學集刊，4(2)，271-283。
38. 楊秀芳(2002)。論閩南語疑問代詞「當時」「著時」「底位」。南北是非：漢語方言的差異與變化，台北:
39. 羅竹風（編）(1994).漢語大詞典.北京:漢語大詞典出版社.