「研究假－ê」vs.「假ê研究」

"Gián-kiù ké--ê" vs. "Ké ê gián-kiù"

10.6710/JTLL.202304_18(1).0004

劉承賢(Seng-Hian LAU)

V假的 ； 事件控制 ； 輕動詞 ； 形容詞 ； 台語 ； V ké--ê ； event control ； light verb ； adjective ； Taiwanese

臺灣語文研究

18卷1期（2023 / 04 / 01）

185 - 228

繁體中文;英文

本文旨在釐清台語「V假的」句型的句法及語義內涵。本文指出「V假的」句型有不同的次類，除了「講假的」這類不存在句法和語義互映不對稱外，在句法和語義互映不對稱的句子當中，只有部分能以輕動詞分析，而本文則以無法採輕動詞分析者為目標。針對目標句型，本文發現若句中有兩個動詞組時，其間呈主謂結構的關係，核心義為「V的事件雖然為真（已發生）但卻沒有預期的效果或結果」。由語料庫搜尋結果來看，此一句型有可能是相對後起的新句型，推測是一般用法的「講假的（話）」擴大延伸發展的結果。由於此句型中有動詞一致的要求，不同於一般「動詞重覆」現象，本文以「事件控制」結構對這類句子提出分析。此一新型態的「事件控制」結構的發掘，讓我們對於自然語言中的「事件控制」有了更進一步的了解。

This study aims to investigate the syntax and semantics of the "V ké--ê" [V fake LINKER] construction in Taiwanese. It points out that this construction is not homogeneous. Among the "V ké--ê" sentences that exhibit syntax-semantics mismatch, only some can be accounted for with the light verb analysis. Focusing on those that cannot be explained with the light verb analysis, this study points out that, when there are two VPs in this construction, they are structurally subject and predicate. The core meaning of the construction is "the event of V happened but the expected effects or result did not follow." Our search results from corpus data show that this construction is likely a relatively new development in this language, probably a further development from the phrase "kóng ké ê (uē)" [say fake LINKER (words)]. Additionally, when another VP precedes [V fake--ê] in the sentence, the verbs of these two VPs must be identical, but they behave differently from other verb-copying phenomena. This study provides an analysis based on the notion of "event control" involving a complex predicate. The investigated construction suggests a new perspective on event control in natural languages.

1. Lau, Seng-hian(2021).A Very Long-Distance Dependency: On the Evaluative Verb Reduplicative Construction.Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies, New Series,51(3),587-632.
   連結：
2. Cappelle, Bert,Denis, Pascal,Keller, Mikaela(2018).Facing the facts of fake: A distributional semantics and corpus annotation approach.Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association,6(1),9-42.
3. Cheng, Lisa L.-S.,Huang, C.-T. James,Li, Y.-H. Audrey,Tang, C.-C. Jane(1999).Hoo, Hoo, Hoo: Syntax of the Causative, Dative, and Passive Constructions in Taiwanese.Journal of Chinese Linguistics,14,146-203.
4. Cheng, Lisa L.-S.,Sybesma, Rint(2005).A Chinese relative.Organizing Grammar. Linguistic Studies in Honor of Henk van Riemsdijk,Berlin:
5. Chierchia, Gennaro,McConnell-Ginet, Sally(1990).Meaning and Grammar: An Introduction to Semantics.Cambridge, MA:The MIT Press.
6. Chomsky, Noam(1995).The Minimalist Program.Cambridge, MA:The MIT Press.
7. Chomsky, Noam(2008).On Phases.Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud,Cambridge, MA:
8. Cinque, Guglielmo(2014).The semantic classification of adjectives. A view from syntax.Studies in Chinese Linguistics,35(1),3-32.
9. Constantinescu, Camelia(2013).Big eaters and real idiots: evidence for adnominal degree modification?.Proceedings of Sinn Und Bedeutung,17,183-200.
10. den Dikken, Marcel(2006).Relators and Linkers: The Syntax of Predication, predicate inversion, and copulas.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
11. Fabricius-Hansen, Cathrine(ed.),Haug, Da(ed.)(2012).Big Events, Small Clauses.Berlin:Mouton de Gruyter.
12. Fischer, Silke(2018).Locality, control, and non-adjoined islands.Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics,3(1),82.1-82.40.
13. Fischer, Silke,Høyem, Inghild Flaate(2021).Event control.Non-canonical Control in a Cross-linguistic Perspective,Amsterdam:
14. Gómez, Kryzzya(2019).Overt vs. Null Subjects in nonfinite constructions of Colombian Spanish.III encuentro sobre dialectos del español (SpadIsyn),Madrid Espagne:
15. Hiraiwa, Ken(2005).Cambridge, MA,MIT.
16. Huang, C.-T. James(1982).MA,MIT.
17. Huang, C.-T. James(1994).Verb Movement and Some Syntax-Semantics Mismatches in Chinese.Chinese Languages and Linguistics,2,587-613.
18. Kamp, Hans(1975).Two theories about adjectives.Formal Semantics of Natural Language,Cambridge:
19. Kamp, Hans,Partee, Barbara(1995).Prototype theory and compositionality.Cognition,57,129-191.
20. Kenstowicz, M.(ed.)(2001).Ken Hale: A Life in Language.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
21. Kortmann, Bernd(1991).Free Adjuncts and Absolutes in English: Problems of Control and Interpretation.London:Routledge.
22. Kratzer, Angelika(1989).Stage-Level and Individual-Level Predicates.University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics,12,147-221.
23. Lien, Chinfa(2009).The focus marker si7 是 and lexicalization of si7- mih8 是乜into what wh-words in Earlier Southern Min Texts.Language and Linguistics,10(4),745-764.
24. Lin, Tzong-hong Jonah(2001).Irvine,University of California.
25. Liu, Fan,Luo, Qiongpeng(2020).Gradability, subjectivity and the semantics of the adjectival zhen ‘real’ and jia ‘fake’ in Mandarin.Chinese Lexical Semantics: CLSW 2019,Berlin:
26. Partee, Barbara H.(2009).The dynamics of adjective meaning.Computational Linguistics and Intellectual Technologies: Papers from the Annual International Conference “Dialogue”,Moscow:
27. Partee, Barbara H.(2010).Privative adjectives: subsective plus coercion.Presuppositions and Discourse: Essays offered to Hans Kamp,Bingley:
28. Satik, Deniz.Satik, Deniz. 2021. Control is not movement: evidence from overt PRO in Ewe. Unpublished manuscript. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University..
29. Svenonius, Peter(2004).On the Edge.Peripheries: Syntactic Edges and Their Effects,Dordrecht:
30. Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan(2014).Syntax-Semantics Mismatches, Focus Movement and Light Verb Syntax.Peaches and Plums
31. Yang, Barry C.-Y..To appear. Revisiting sentence-final adjunct WHAT.Language and Linguistics
32. Zhao, Chen(2022).Chinene verb copying constructions: A labeling account.Lingua,269,1-39.
33. 大愛電視台. 2007. 鄭文力導演電視劇「鐵樹花開」。
34. 中華電視台. 1988. 賴慧中導演電視劇「酒瓶可賣否」。
35. 公共電視文化事業基金會. 2007. 李岳峰導演電視劇「出外人生」。
36. 台灣語通信研究會. 1908-1941.《語苑》。臺北：台灣語通信研究會。
37. 俞曉群（編）(1984).呂叔湘全集–第六卷.瀋陽市:遼寧教育出版社.
38. 胡萬川（編）(2004).台南縣閩南語故事集（十）.台南縣新營市:台南縣政府.
39. 胡萬川（編）,陳益源（編）(1999).雲林縣閩南語故事集四.林縣斗六市:雲林縣文化局.
40. 曹逢甫(1997)。,臺北:行政院國家科學委員會。
41. 湯廷池(1979)。國語的「是」字句。國語語法研究論集，臺北:
42. 黃正德(2008)。從“他的老師當得好”談起。語言科學，7(3)，225-241。
43. 楊允言. 2019. 台語文 Concordance 程式：http://ip194097.ntcu.edu.tw/TG/concordance/form.asp（查詢日期：2022年 10 月 24 日）。
44. 聶志平,田祥勝(2014)。“真”、“假”真的不能被程度副詞修飾嗎。語言研究，34(2)，6-11。
45. 羅瓊鵬(2016)。程度、量級與形容詞“真”和“假”的語義。語言研究，36(2)，94-100。