J.-F. Lyotard對I. Kant壯美觀的解構及其在情意教育上的省思

J.-F. Lyotard's Deconstruction of I. Kant's Philosophy of the Sublime and its Implications for Affective Education

10.6910/BER.200609_(52-3).0003

李崗(Kang Lee)

壯美觀 ； 情意教育 ； Lyotard ； the sublime ； affective education ； Lyotard

教育研究集刊

52:3期（2006 / 09 / 30）

43 - 72

繁體中文

本文旨在闡明Lyotard如何解構Kant的壯美觀，並探討其在情意教育上的省思。首先，分為四個部分加以說明：一、Kant壯美觀的背景與內涵；二、Lyotard衍異哲學的背景與內涵；三、Lyotard解構Kant壯美觀的論證；四、Lyotard對現代藝術的詮釋。其次，本文根據Kant與Lyotard的美學立場，針對國內推展情意教育所必須面對的問題，進行深入的省思：「語言能否表達情感？」、「情感能否加以轉化？」、「轉化能否建立規則？」。最後，一方面評述Kant與Lyotard壯美觀的特色與限制，另一方面為國內情意教育提出具體可行的四點建議。

The purpose of this study is to illuminate Lyotard's deconstruction of Kant's philosophy of the sublime, and to develop its implications for affective education. First, the paper describes the Enlightenment background of Kant's theory of the sublime. Second, it illustrates the ＂postmodern condition＂ and Lyotard's philosophy of the ＂differend.＂ Third, it analyzes the arguments Lyotard uses in deconstructing Kant's sublime. Fourth, it explores Lyotard's interpretation of modern art. Most importantly, Lyotard claimed that Kant's arguments were invalid and his definition of the sublime was inappropriate. Lyotard ironically rewrote ＂The family story of the Sublime＂ in order to set forth his new interpretation about the ＂Sublime as Differend.＂ This interpretation was set in the context of his earlier theory of the petit recits whse functioning through ＂difference＂ overturned the self-identity of grand narratives. In this study, the following questions will be discussed: ＂Can we use language to express our feelings?＂; ＂Can our feelings be transformed?＂; ＂Can we construct the rules of such transformations?＂ Finally, this paper analyzes the important features and limitations of Lyotard's as well as Kant's sublime philosophy, and offers four specific suggestions regarding the praxis of affective education.

1. Aristotle(1956).On poetry and music (S. H. Butcher, Trans.).New York:Macmillan.
2. Burke, E.(1987).A philosophical enquiry into the origin of our ideas of the sublime and beautiful Oxford.UK:Basil Blackwell.
3. F. Schiller、張玉能譯(1996)。秀美與尊嚴－席勒藝術和美學文集。北京:文化藝術。
4. Kant, I.(1952).The critique of judgement (J. C. Meredith, Trans.).Oxford, UK:Clnrendon Press.
5. Kant, I.,P. Waugh(Ed.)(1992).Post-modernism: A reader.London:Edward Arnold.
6. Laoger, S. K.(1953).Feeling and farm: A theory of art developed from “Philosophy in a new key”.New York:Charles Scriboer's Sons.
7. Lyolard, J.-F.,Thebaud J.-L.,W. Godzieh(Trans.)(1985).Just gaming.Minneapolis, MN:University of Minnesota Press.
8. Lyotard, J.-F.(1984).The posimodern condition: A report an knowledge.Manchester, UK:Manchester University Press.
9. Lyotard, J.-F.(1994).Lessons on the analytic of the sublime: Kant's critique of judgment.Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press.
10. Lyotard, J.-F.,CL Bennington & R. Bowlby(Trans.)(1991).The inhuman: Reflections on time.Cambridge, MA:Polity Press.
11. Lyotsrd, J.-F.,G. V. D. Abbeele(Trans.)(1988).The differend: Phrases in dispute.Minneapolis, MN:University of Minnesota Press.
12. Nietzsche, F.,W. Kaufmann(Trans.)(1967).The birth of tragedy and the case of Wagner.New York:Vintage.
13. Tolstoy, L.,A. Maude(Trans.)(1962).What is art? And essay on art.London:Oxford University Press.
14. Williams, J.(1998).Lyotard: Towards a postmodern philosophy.Cambridge, MA:Polity Press.
15. 王淑俐(1990)。博士論文(博士論文)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所博士論文。
16. 吳麗娟(1989)。讓我們更快樂－理性情緒教育課程。臺北市:心理。
17. 林建福(2001)。教育哲學－情緒層面的特殊觀照。臺北市:五南。
18. 唐淑華(2004)。說故事談情意－《西遊記》在情意教學上的運用。臺北市:心理。
19. 唐淑華(2004)。情意教學－故事討論取向。臺北市:心理。
20. 崔光宙(1999)。孔門情意教育觀之詮釋與實踐。教育研究集刊，43，41-64。
21. 張春興(1990)。從情緒發展理論的演變論情意教育。教育心理學報，23，12。
22. 陳雪麗(2000)。情感教育－儒佛情緒觀的現代應用。臺北市:五南。
23. 馮朝霖(2000)。教育哲學專論－主體、情性與創化。臺北市:元照。
24. 黃月霞(1989)。情感教育與發展性輔導－情育課程對兒童態度與學業成績的影響。臺北市:五南。
25. 黃光雄(1983)。情意領域目標分類。高雄市:復文。
26. 鍾聖校(2000)。情意溝通教學理論編－從建構到實踐。臺北市:五南。

1. 林淑如(2011)。李歐塔後現代思想及其教育涵義探究。教育科學期刊，10(1)，105-123。
2. 劉蔚之(2010)。傳統學術轉型或是西方學術延伸？─五十年來《 教育研究集刊 》哲史類論文在我國近代教育學史上的意義。教育研究集刊，56(2)，1-40。