教育改革研究方法論的回顧與前瞻

Metahistorical Analysis of Methodologies in Education Reform Research

10.6910/BER.200612_(52-4).0005

楊深坑(Shen-Keng Yang)

教育改革 ； 研究方法論 ； 後設歷史分析 ； education reform ； research methodology ； metahistorical analysis

教育研究集刊

52:4期（2006 / 12 / 31）

141 - 171

繁體中文

本文旨在透過後設歷史分析，探討教育改革研究中不同方法論模式之理論基礎及其歷史演變。主要探討的方法論模式有教育借用的邏輯、教育改革的社會文化分析、教育改革中教育發展法則之分析、教育改革的社會認識論及考古學與系譜學分析。最後，指出未來教育改革研究必須善用新科技，對不同族群、不同文化的認知方式與心理習性之細緻差異深入探討，才能使改革研究成果，落實於促進全人類福祉之公平正義教育體制的建立。

This paper offers a metahistorical analysis of various methodological models for education reform research. Ontological and epistemological assumptions of educational borrowing, historico-cultural foundations of educational changes, formulation of universal law of educational development, social epistemological research, policy archeology, policy genealogy are discussed respectively from historical perspective. Finally it is recommended that new technologies, esp., brain science, genome research and information technology, be adopted to study carfully the delicate differces of cognition and dispositions of various cultural groups with a view to building just education systems conducive to full self-realization of all the people in the world.

1. 楊深坑(2005)。朱利安比較教育理論與方法評析。師大學報：教育類，50(2)，13-32。
   連結：
2. 楊深坑(2005)。全球化衝擊下的教育研究。教育研究集刊，51(3)，1-25。
   連結：
3. Bourdieu, P.(1997).Outline of a theory of practice.London:Oxford University Press.
4. Bourdieu, P.,R. Nice(Trans.)(2004).Science of science and reflexivity.Cambridge, MA:Polity.
5. Brewer, W. V.(1971).Victor Cousin as o comparative educator.New York:Teachers College, Columbia University.
6. Bulkeley, K.(2005).Soul, psyche, brain: Nest directions in the study of religion and brain-mind science.New York:Palgrave Macmillan.
7. Cousin, V.(1833).Rapport sur l'état de l'instruction publique dans quelques pays de l'Allemagne.Paris:Levrault.
8. Delieuvin, M.-C.(2000).Marc-Antoine Jullien, de Paris, 1775-1848.Penser L'Éducation,8,17-47.
9. Depaepe, M.(2004).How should the history of education be written? Some reflections about the nature of the discipline from the perspective of the reception of our work.Studies in Philosophy and Education,23,333-345.
10. Diels, H.,Kranz, W.(1956).Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker.Berlin, Germany:Weidmann.
11. Durkheim, E.(1895).Les règles de la méthode sociologique. Bibliothéque de philosophie contemporaine.Paris:Alcan.
12. Foucault, M.(1973).The order of things: An archaeology of human sciences.New York:Vintage.
13. Foucault, M.(1988).Madness and civilization: A history of insanity in the age of reason.New York:Vintage.
14. Foucault, M.(1972).The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language.New York:Pantheon.
15. Foucault, M.,A. M. Sheridan-Smith, Trans(1979).Discipline and punish: The birth of prison.Harmondsworth, UK:Penguin.
16. Foucault, M.,G. Burchell(Eds.),C. Goreon(Eds.),P. Miller(Eds.)(1991).The Foucault effect: Studies in Governmentality.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
17. Foucault, M.,G. Burchell(Eds.),C. Goreon(Eds.),P. Miller(Eds.)(1991).The Foucault effect: Studies in Governmentality.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
18. Foucault, M.,G. Burchell,C. Goreon(Eds.),P. Miller(Eds.)(1991).The Foucault effect: Studies in Governmentality.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
19. Fraser, S. E.,Brickman, W. W.(1968).A history of international and comparative education: Nineteenth-century documents.Foresman Scott.
20. Gale, T.(2001).Critical policy sociology: Historiography, archaeology and genealogy as methods of policy analysis.Journal of Educational Policy,16(5),379-393.
21. Hans, N.(1949).Comparative Education.London:Routledge & Kegan Paul.
22. Holmes, B.(1981).Comparative education: Some considerations of methods.London:George Allen & Unwin.
23. Holmes, B.,G. Bereday(Eds.),J. Lauwerys(Eds.)(1958).Yearbook of education: The secondary school curriculum.London:Evans Brothers.
24. Holmes, B.,J. Schriewer(Eds.),B. Holmes(Eds.)(1990).Theories and methods in comparative education(2nd ed.).Frankfurt am M, Germany:Peter Lang.
25. Imperatori, M.(1962).Marc-antoine Jullien and Horace Mann-Poineers of Comparative Education.London:University of London.
26. Jullien, M.-A.(1817).Journal d'Education et reproduction.Paris:L. Colas.
27. Kandel, I. L.(1993).Studies of comparative education.London:George G. Harrap.
28. King, E.(1968).Comparative studies and educational decision.London:Methuen Educational.
29. Kristen, C.,Römmer, A.,Müller, W.,Kalter, F.(2005).Longitudinal studies for education reprots: European and North American examples.Berlin, Germany:Federal Ministry of Education and Research Publications and Website Division.
30. Ladwig, J. G.(1994).For whom this reform? Outlining educational policy as a social field.British Journal of Sociology of Education,15(3),341-363.
31. Mann, H.(1864).Annual reports on education.Boston:Horace B. Fuller.
32. Masemann, V. L.(1990).Ways of knowing: Implications for comparative education.Comparative Education Review,34(4),465-473.
33. Masemann, V. L.,P. G. Altbach(Eds.),G. P. Kelly(Eds.)(1986).New approaches to comparative education.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
34. Masemann, V. L.,T. Husen(Eds.),T. N. Postlethwaite(Eds.)(1990).International encyclopedia of education.New York:Pergamon.
35. Merritt, R. L.,Coombs, F. S.(1997).Politics and educational reform.Comparative Education Review,21,2-3.
36. Noah, H. J.,Eckstein, M. A.(1969).Toward a science of comparative education.London:The Macmillan Company.
37. Oelders, J.(1996).Reformpädagogik: Eine kritische dogmengeschichte.Weinheim, Germany:Juventa.
38. Phillips, D.,C. Kodron(Eds.),B. V. Kopp(Eds.),U. Lauterbach(Eds.),U. Schäter(Eds.),G. Schmidt(Eds.)(1997).Comparative education: Challenges-Iintermediation-Practice.Frankfurt am Main, Germany:Deutsches Institut fur Internationale Padagogische Forschung.
39. Phillips, D.,Ochs, K.(2003).Processes of policy borrowing in education: Some analytical and explanatory devices.Comparative Education,39(4),451-461.
40. Popkewita, T. S.(1991).A political sociology of educational reform: Power/knowledge in teaching, teacher education, and research.New York:Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
41. Popkewitz, T. S.(Ed.)(1987).Critical studies in teacher education.London:The Falmer Press.
42. Psacharopoulos, G.(1990).Comparative education: From theory to practice, or are you A:\Neo.*or B:\*.ist?.Comparative Education Review,34(3),369-380.
43. Ringer, F. K.(1979).Education and society in modern Europe.Bloomington, IN:Indiana University Press.
44. Röhrs, H.(2001).Die Reformpädagogik: Ursprung und Verlauf Unter Internationalem Aspekt.Weiheim, Germany:Beltz.
45. Röhrs, H.(1995).Die Vergleichende und Internationale erziehungswissenschaft.Weinhein, Germany:Deutscher Studien Verlag.
46. Rust, V. D.(1991).Postmodernism and its comparative education implications.Comparative Eduction Review,35(4),610-626.
47. Schepp, H.-H.,H. V. H. Scheuerl(Ed.)(1979).Klasiker der Pädagogik.München, Germany: Back:Beck.
48. Scheurich, J. J.(1994).Policy archeology: A new policy studies methodology.Journal of Educational Policy,9(4),297-316.
49. Schriewer, J.,J. Schriewer(Eds.),B. Holmes(Eds.)(1990).Theories and methods in comparative education.Frankfurt am Main, Germany:Peter Lang.
50. Spranger, E.(1928).Kultur und Erziehung.Leipzig, Germany:Quelle & Meyer.
51. Steiner-Khamsi, G.,A. Nóvoa(Eds.),M. Lawn(Eds.)(2002).Fabricating Europe.Germany:Kluwer.
52. Steiner-Khamsi, G.,J. Schriewer(Ed.)(2000).Discourse formation in comparative education.Frankfurt am Main, Germany:Peter Lang.
53. Yang, Shen-Keng(1998).Comparison, understanding and teacher education in international perspective.Frankfurt am Main, Germany:Peter Lang.
54. 楊深坑(1998)。安諾德的比較教育理論與方法。比較教育，45，28-36。
55. 楊深坑(2002)。科學理論與教育學發展。臺北市:心理。

1. 顏君玲(2020)。大學校院標竿學習運作機制之研究。臺灣師範大學教育學系學位論文。2020。1-232。