A. Giddens自反現代性對師資培育課程研究之啟發

A. Giddens' Reflexive Modernization and Its Implications on the Curriculum Research of Teacher Education

10.6910/BER.200803_(54-1).0004

黃騰(Teng Huang)

自反現代性 ； 教師改變 ； 意義 ； 師資培育 ； reflexive modernization ； teacher change ； meaning ； teacher education

教育研究集刊

54:1期（2008 / 03 / 31）

87 - 116

繁體中文

本文根據二類不同的研究指出，教師教育的課程應該以「道德意義」做為核心。第一類研究是「教師改變」，但長期以來的研究指出，「教師」總是在改革中被視為是特定的「角色」。每個人總是認為做為一個「教師」，就應該具有特定的性格、特質、能力等，而其結果就是忽略教師生皆為一個活生生的人的重要性，並最終導致課程改革的失敗。第二類研究是社會現況的研究，而社會學家A. Giddens(1991)指出，「道德意義」不僅對個人存在是重要的，而且也是當代人們普遍的認同困擾與反思行動的基礎。因此我們認為，若要透過課程改革來促進社會進步，那麼就要能讓教師的個人「道德意義」結合在改革歷程中。最後我們將試著指出，這樣的師資培育課程未來主要的研究方向。

Basing on two different research approaches, we suggest that the curriculum of teacher education should pay more attention to the ＂moral meaning＂ of teachers. The first approach is about ＂teacher change.＂ These studies point out that the meaning of being a teacher was always limited to certain ＂roles.＂ It means that being a teacher one should have certain kind of personalities, traits, or abilities. The curriculum reform with this perspective always fails because it overlook that teachers are living persons. The second approach is about the situation of contemporary society. Giddens suggests that ＂moral meaning＂ is not only very important to personal existence but also the base of individual's identities and reflexivity. Therefore, if we expect to have a better result of curriculum reform, personal meaning of teachers should be integrated in the curriculum reform. Finally, we would like to provide some suggestions that may improve the curriculum research of teacher education in the future.

1. 陸洛、楊國樞(2005)。社會取向與個人取向的自我實現觀：概念分析與實徵初探。本土心理學研究，23，3-70。
   連結：
2. 黃騰(2005)。從「角色」到「自我」―論教師改變的歷史困境與可能。教育研究集刊，51(4)，89-116。
   連結：
3. Archer, M.(1988).Culture and agency: The place of culture in social theory.Cambridge:The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
4. Archer. M.(2000).Being human: The problem of agency.Cambridge:The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
5. Assagioli, R.(1974).The act of will.Baltimore:Penguin Books Inc.
6. Barker, C.(2000).Cultural studies Theory arid practice.London:Sage.
7. Barnes, B.(2000).Understanding agency: Social theory and responsible action.London:Sage.
8. Bauman, Z.(2001).The individualized society.Oxford:Polity Press.
9. Bauman, Z.(2000).Liquid modernity.Oxford:Polity Press.
10. Bauman, Z.(1998).Work, consumerism, and rise new poor.Buckingham:Open University Press.
11. Bauman. Z.(1993).Postmodern ethics.Oxford:Blackwell.
12. Beck, U.(1999).World risk society.Cambridge:Polity Press.
13. Beijaard, D.,Meijer, P. C.,Verloop, N.(2004).Reconsidering research on teachers` professional identity.Teaching and Teacher Education,20(2),107-128.
14. Bhaskar, R.(2002).Meta-reality: The philosophy of meta-reality.New Delhi:Sage.
15. Bhaskar, R.(2002).Reflections on meta-reality: Transcendence, emancipation, and everyday life.New Delhi:Sage.
16. Carlyle, D.,Woods, P.(2002).Emotions of teacher stress.England:Trentham Books.
17. Connelly, F M.,Clandinin, D. J.(1999).Shaping a professional identity: Stories of education practice.London, ON:Althouse Press.
18. Craib, I.(1992).Anthony Giddens.London:Routledge.
19. David, C.,Elizabeth, O.(2000).Teacher professionalism: The wrong conversation.Education Canada,40(1),4-7.
20. Dillabough, J. A.(1999).Gender politics and conceptions of the modern teacher: Women, identity and professionalism.British Journal of Sociology of Education,20(3),373-394.
21. Elias, N.(1991).The society of individuals.London:The Continuum International Publishing Group.
22. Elliott, A.(2001).Concepts of the self.Cambridge:Polity Press.
23. Foucault, M.,H. L. Dreyfus,P. Rabinow (Eds.)(1983).Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics.Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.
24. Frankl, V. E.(1969).The will to meaning: Foundations and applications of logotherapy.New York:The New American Library.
25. Giddens, A.(1991).Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age.CA:Standford University Press.
26. Giddens, A.(1985).The nation-state and violence.Cambridge:Polity Press.
27. Giddens, A.(1979).Central problems in social theory.London:The MacMillan Press.
28. Giddens, A.(1990).The consequences of modernity.Cambridge:Polity Press.
29. Giddens, A.(1984).The constitution of society.Cambridge:Polity Press.
30. Giddens, A.,U. Beck,A. Giddens,S. Lash (Eds.)(1994).Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order.Cambridge:Polity Press.
31. Goodson, I. F.,W. F Pinar (Ed.)(1998).Curriculum: Taward new identities.New York:Garland.
32. Hansen, D. T.,V. Richardson (Ed.)(2001).Handbook of research an teaching.American Educational Research Association.
33. Hashweh, M. Z.(2005).Teacher pedagogical constructions: A reconfiguration of pedagogical content knowledge.Teacher and Teaching: Theory and Practice,11(3),273-292.
34. Hwu, W. S.,W. F. Pinar (Ed.)(1998).Curriculum: Toward new identities.London:Garland.
35. Lash, S.,U. Beck,A. Giddens,S. Lash (Eds.)(1994).Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order.Cambridge:Polity Press.
36. Maslow, A. H.(1968).Toward a psychology of being.Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
37. Maslow, B. G.(1971).The farther reaches of human nature.New York:The Viking Press.
38. May, R.(1969).Love and will.New York:W. W. Norton.
39. Mead, G. H.(1934).Mind, self and society..Chicage:University of Chicago Press.
40. Mouzelis, N.(1995).Sociological theory: What went wrong.London:Routledge.
41. Munro, P.,W. F. Pinar (Ed.)(1998).Curriculum: Toward new identities.New York:Garland.
42. Nias, J.,M. L. Holly,C. S. McLaughlin (Eds.)(1989).Perspective on teacher professional development.London:Falmer Press.
43. Pinar, W. F.,Reynolds, W. F.,Slattery, P.,Taubman, P. M.(1995).Understanding curriculum.New York:Peter Lang.
44. Popkewitz, T. S.,T. Popkewitz,B. M. Franklin,M. A. Bereyra (Eds.)(2001).Cultural history and education.New York:Routlege.
45. Richardson, V,Placier, P.,V. Richardson (Ed.)(2001).Handbook of research on teaching.American Educational Research Association.
46. Schoenfeld, A. H.(1998).Toward a theory of teaching-in-context.Issues in Education,4(1),1-94.
47. Slattery, P.(1995).Curriculum development in the postmodern era.London:Garland.
48. Smith, D.,C. G. A. Bryant,D. Jary (Eds.)(1997).Anthony giddens: Critical assessment.London:Routledge.
49. Smith, H.(1982).Beyond the post-modern mind.New York:Crossroads.
50. Stanley, W. B.(1992).Curriculum for utopia: Social reconstructionism and critical pedagogy in the postmodern era.New York:State University of New York.
51. Taylor, C.(2004).Modern social imaginaries.London:Duke University Press.
52. Walton, M. D.(2000).Say it`s a lie or I`ll punch you: Naive epistemology in classroom conflict episodes.Discourse processes,29(2),113-136.
53. Wilber, K.(1977).Spectrum of consciousness.Wheaton:The Theosophical Publishing House.
54. Zeidler, D. L.,Sadler, T. S.,Simons, M. L.,Howes. E. V.(2005).Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education.Science Education,89,357-377.
55. 王建疆(2003)。修養、境界、審美。北京:中國社會科學。
56. 車文博(2003)。人本主義心理學。杭州:浙江教育。
57. 張美惠譯、J. M. Schwartz、S. Begley著(2003)。重塑大腦(The mind and the brain)。臺北市:時報。
58. 郭至和(2004)。「解放」「發聲」「增權賦能」？―一位從事課程行動研究小學老師的省思。「課程研究與教師」研討會，臺北市:
59. 黃騰(2007)。博士論文(博士論文)。臺北市，國立臺北教育大學課程與教學研究所。
60. 葉啟政(2004)。進出「結構－行動」的困境。臺北市:三民。
61. 趙敦華(2001)。西方哲學簡史。北京:北京大學。
62. 歐用生、黃騰付梓中。「銜接」課程統整的理論與實踐：以臺灣九年一貫改革下的教師觀點爲例。課程研究，3(1)

1. 楊智雄(2010)。從生活政治觀點分析教師專業認同。學校行政，67，31-50。
2. (2022)。為民主服務：論中小學教師專業學習社群政策的挑戰與可能。教育行政與評鑑學刊，31，85-122。