從學校教師會功能與小學教師專業認同的關聯性省思教師組織的屬性

Examining the Nature of Teacher Associations: The Interaction between Function and Professional Identity

10.6910/BER.200809_(54-3).0003

姜添輝(Tien-Hui Chiang)

小學教師 ； 學校教師會 ； 專業認同 ； primary school teacher ； school teacher association ； professional identity

教育研究集刊

54:3期（2008 / 09 / 30）

65 - 97

繁體中文

教育社會學界對教師組織功能仍存在高度的爭論，結構功能主義學者將之定位於專業與功能的範疇，批判論者則主張應採取工會主義的路線。這些論點卻忽視教師專業認同的影響，為檢證此種關聯性，本研究對教育官員、校長、教師會幹部與小學教師進行共32次訪談。研究發現顯示，保護完好的工作條件與環境塑造出明確的專業認同，此種心理形成明顯的教學關注取向以及自我約束的價值觀，因而對集體性教師會活動產生冷漠感。內在認同也轉化成教師對外互動的內在管理機制，由於專業認同衍生去政治化的意識型態，致使大部分受訪者期望學校教師會能與政治勢力劃清界線，以維護自身中立與客觀的專業形象，並使大部分教師排拒直接性的工會行動。

For sociologists, the purposes of teacher associations have been variously described as playing a key part in sustaining teachers' claims to professional status and facilitating their proletarian interests. However, the influence of teacher professional identity on the operation of teacher associations tends to be ignored. Data collection for this study was conducted by completing thirty-two interviews of educational officials and teacher association officials, head teachers, and teachers in Taiwan. The findings show that Taiwanese teachers occupied a superior location within the division of labour where society tends to bestow upon them a great degree of physical and psychic reward, creating a context in which a strong sense of professional identity develops. This identity acts as an inner mechanism to regulate its owners' recognition of their roles and their relationship with others. It manifested itself among our informants as professional commitment to their own teaching and self-discipline in conforming to an ethical code. An ideology of depoliticisation led teacher to expect the educational system and their professional associations to keep a distance from political forces and parties in order to maintain their neutrality and objectivity. They showed little enthusiasm for collective movement and less for union action.

1. 黃毅志(2003)。「臺灣地區新職業聲望與社經地位量表」之建構與評估―社會科學與教育社會學研究本土化。教育研究集刊，49(4)，1-31。
   連結：
2. Adalsteinsdottir, K.(2004).Teachers` behaviour and practices in the classroom.Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research,48(1),95-114.
3. Alsup, J.(2006).Teacher identity discourses.New York:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Apple, M. W.(1990).Ideology and curriculum.New York:Routledge.
5. Apple. M. W.(1985).Education and power.Boston:Ark Paperbacks.
6. Barber, M.(1992).Education and the teacher unions.London:Cassell.
7. Bernstein, B.(1996).Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity.London:Taylor.
8. Borg, W. R.,Gall, M. D.(1989).Educational research.London:Longman.
9. Brown, R.(2000).Group processes.Oxford:Blackwell.
10. Carr-Saunders, A.W.(1933).The professions.Oxford:University of Oxford Press.
11. Castells, M.,M. Castells,R. Flecha,P. Freire,H. A. Giroux,D. Macedo,P. Willis (Eds.)(1999).Critical education in the new information age.New York:Rowman.
12. Cote, J. E.,S. Ball (Ed.)(2000).Sociology of education.London:Routledge Falmer.
13. Davis, K.,Moore, W. E.,R. Bendix,M. Lipset (Eds.)(1966).Class, status, and power.London:Routledge.
14. Durkheim, E.(1933).The division of labour in society.New York:The Free Press.
15. Erickson, F.,M. Wittrock (Ed.)(1986).Qualitative methods in research on teaching.London:Collier Macmillan.
16. Foucault, M.(1972).The archeology of knowledge.New York:Tavistock.
17. Foucault, M.(1991).Discipline and punish: The Birth of the prison.London:Penguin.
18. Freidson, E.(1994).Professionalism reborn: Theory, prophecy, and policy.Cambridge:Polity.
19. Gosden, P. H. J. H.(1972).The revolution ala profession.Oxford:Basil Blackwell.
20. Grace, G.(1991).The state and the teachers: Problems in teacher supply retention and morale.Philadelphia:Multilingual Matters.
21. Hamnerness, K.,Hammond, L.,Bransford, J.,Berliner, D.,Smith, M.,McDonald, M.,Zeichner, K.,L. Darling-Hammond,J. Bransford (Eds.)(2005).Preparing teachers for a changing world.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
22. Jackson, P. W.(1968).Life in classroom.London:Teachers College Press.
23. Johnson, T. J.(1972).Professions and power.London:Macmillan.
24. Larson, M. S.(1977).The rise of professionalism.London:University of California Press.
25. Lieberman, M.(1964).Education as a profession.New York:Prentice.
26. Lortie, D. C.(1975).School-teacher: A sociological study.London:The University of Chicago Press.
27. Mead, G. H.(1934).Mind. self and society.Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.
28. Nias, J.(1989).Primary teachers talking.London:Routledge.
29. Osunde, A. U.,Izevbigie, A. I.(2006).An assessment of teachers` attitude towards teaching profession in midwestern Nigeria.Education,126(3),462-467.
30. Ozga, J.(1992).Paper presented at the annual conference of British Educational Management and Administration Society.England:University of Bristole.
31. Ozga, J.,Lawn, M.(1981).Teachers, professionalism and class: A study of organized teachers.London:Falmer.
32. Popkewitz, T.,S. Ball (Ed.)(2000).Sociology of education.London:Routledge Falmer.
33. Robson, J.(2006).Teacher professionalism in further and higher education.Oxford:Routledge.
34. Sadker, M. P.,Sadker, D. M.(1997).Teachers, schools, and society.New York:McGraw-Hill.
35. Säfstrdöm, C. A.(2005).The European knowledge society and the diminishing state control of education: The case of sweden.Journal of Education Policy,2(5),583-593.
36. Shkedi, A.,Nisan, M.(2006).Teachers` cultural ideology: Patterns of curriculum and teaching culturally valued texts.Teacher College Record,108(4),687-725.
37. Teichier, U.(1996).Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
38. Tropp, A.(1957).The school teachers.London:William Heinemann.
39. Tsurumi, E P.(1977).Japanese colonial education in Taiwan.London:Harvard University Press.
40. Veblen, T.(1994).The theory of the leisure class.New York:Dover.
41. Waller, W.(1932).The sociology of teaching.New York:Russell.
42. Weber, M.(1949).The methodology of the social sciences.New York:The Free Press.
43. Weber, M.(1962).Bosic concepts in sociology.New York:Philosophical Library.
44. Weber, M.(1964).The theory of social and economic organization.New York:The Free Press.
45. Williams, A.,Prestage, S.,Bedward, J.(2001).Individualism to collaboration: The significance of teacher culture to the induction of newly qualified teachers.Journal of Education for Teaching,27(3),253-267.
46. Willis, P.(1977).Learning to labor: How working class kids get working class jobs.New York:Columbia University Press.
47. Wollf, J.(1993).The social production of art.London:Macmillan.
48. Wright B. O.,E. O. Wright,U. Becker,J. Brenner,M. Burawoy,V. Burns,U Marshall (Eds.)(1998).The debate on classes.London:Verso.
49. 王渝奉(2005)。臺南市，國立臺南大學社會科教育學系。
50. 卯静儒、振建成(2005)。在地化與全球化之間－解嚴後臺注課程改革論述的擺盪。臺灣教育社會學研究，5(1)，39-76。
51. 李新鄉(2003)。教廓會組織與學校行政運作互動状况之實際省思。「现代教育输擅―教師會組織與學校行政運作」研討會，嘉龚市:
52. 汪知亭(1978)。臺灣教育史料新編。臺北市:商務。
53. 林清江(1981)。教育社會學新論。臺北市:五南。
54. 姜添輝(1998)。教師組織是否是教師專業要件：英國全國教師聊合會的個案研究。「87學年度教育學術研討會」論文集，臺北市:
55. 姜添輝(2000)。美英兩國三個主要教師組織之比較研究分析。「89學年度教育學術研討會」論文集，新竹市:
56. 姜添輝(2003)。英國教師組織的政治特性。南師學报，37(1)，55-81。
57. 張鸿煜(2006)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺中市，國立教育大學教育學系。
58. 郭丁熒(1997)。師院學生的社會流動之研究。國家科學委員會研究彙刊：人文及社會科學，7(2)，181-197。
59. 陳奎憙(1989)。教育社會學。臺北市:三民。
60. 陳寶山(1997)。走出教師會組織的迷思―教師敢放建立一個嶄新的學校秩序嗎。「國小初任教師專業成長理論與寶務」研討會，臺北市:
61. 彭富源(1997)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學教育學系。
62. 黃嘉莉(2003)。博士論文(博士論文)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學教育學系。
63. 蔡清華、楊深坑主編(2003)。各國教師組織興專業權發展。臺北市:高等教育。
64. 鄭英傑(2006)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學教育學系碩士論文，未出版。
65. 蘇索鸞、黃國隆(1992)。中學教師對教會工會與罷教的態度。教育心理與研究，15，173-214。
66. 吴文星(1983)。日據時期臺灣師範教育之研究。臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學歷史研究所。
67. 张慶熊譯、E. Husserl著(1988)。歐洲科學危機與超驗现象學|The crisis of European science and transcendental phenomenology。上海:上海譯文。
68. 张曉蕙(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。南投縣，國立暨南國際大學比較教育學系。
69. 黄乃笑、曹芳齡(2003)。學校組織中集體協商運作之研究―以北部六縣市國民中學爲例。教育研究集刊，49(2)，63-96。
70. 黄淑君(2000)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學教育學系。

1. 陳惠雪(Hui-Hsueh Chen)(2023)。國小雙語自然教師的專業認同：「衝突」－「協調」－「再生」。教育研究集刊。(69:2)。1-48。