An Innovative Framework Applied to Elementary Schools: A Case Study of the Gaps Knowledge Management

應用於國民小學的創新架構：知識管理缺口之個案分析

10.6910/BER.200906_(55-2).0004

陳建志(Chien-Chin Chen)；蘇琪婷(Chi-Ting Su)；謝秉蓉(Ping-Jung Hsien)；林清河(Chin-Ho Lin)

knowledge management ； the gaps of knowledge management ； school effectiveness ； case study ； 知識管理 ； 知識管理缺口 ； 學校效能 ； 個案研究

教育研究集刊

55:2期（2009 / 06 / 30）

99 - 138

英文

While school principals are directors are putting more emphasis on knowledge management activities, it is the right time for elementary schools to put knowledge management (KM) into practice. The school administrators hope to improve school effectiveness through the activities KM. However, when implementing KM, there are some obstacles leading to gaps that may influence school effectiveness. In view of such problems, this research proposed an innovative framework of ＂the gaps KM＂ to fully illustrate the management gaps that might occur during the process of KM. The content-analysis approach combined with the thematic analysis was implemented in the study. Through in-depth interviews with principals and directors of six schools, we explored the cause of these gaps and approaches to reducing these gaps. This research identified a comprehensive set of factors according to the management point of view that could potentially impact the magnitude or direction of these gaps and the corrective action for enhancing the success of the process of KM. This framework is expected to provide a convenient way to verify gaps KM and, thus, schools can make corrections and adjustments accordingly to enhance success when implementing KM.

目前國民小學正值大力推動知識管理之際，而且學校領導者也越來越注重知識管理活動的實行，期望透過知識管理活動來提升學校效能。然而，當執行知識管理時，卻會有一些類似缺口的障礙因素影響學校效能。因此，本研究提出「知識管理缺口」之創新性架構，詳細闡述執行知識管理時在管理上會遇到的缺口。運用主題之內容分析取徑來加以研究，透過訪談 6 所學校的校長或主任，發覺這些缺口的成因及消弭這些缺口的方式。根據管理的觀點定義出可能會潛在影響這些缺口強度及方向之完整因子，並找出增加知識管理有效性的相關作為。期許能提供學校定義知識管理缺口更便利的方式，使其執行知識管理時，能據此找出提升知識管理的有效方式及因應策略。

1. Anderson, T. K.,Felsenfeld, S.(2003).A thematic analysis of late recovery from stuttering.American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology,12(2),243-253.
2. Barney, J.(1995).Looking inside for competitive advantage.Academy of Management Executive,9(4),49-61.
3. Berg, B. L.(2000).Qualitative research methods for the social science.Boston, MA:Allyn & Bacon.
4. Bryman, A.,Burgess, R. G.(1999).Qualitative research.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
5. Campbell, A.,Luchs, K. S.(1997).Core competency-based strategy.Boston, MA:International Thomson Business Press.
6. Colleen, A. W.,Leila, G S.(2007).New Learning: Constructing knowledge in leadership training programs.Community College Review,35(2),88-112.
7. Desouza, K. C.(2003).Strategic contributions of game rooms to knowledge management: Some preliminary insights.Information and Management,41,63-74.
8. Eisenhardt, K. M.(1989).Building theories from case study research.Academy of Management Review,14(4),532-550.
9. Hall, R.,Andriani, P.(2002).Managing knowledge for innovation.Long Range Planning,35,29-48.
10. Hamel, J.,Dufour, S.,Fortin, D.(1993).Case study method.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
11. Hedlund, G.(1994).A model of knowledge management and the N-form corporation.Strategic Management Journal,15,73-90.
12. Holsapple, C. W.,Singh, M.(2001).The knowledge chain model: Activities for competitiveness.Expert Systems with Applications,20(2),77-98.
13. Khera, N.,Stroobant, T.,Primhak, K. A.,Gupta, R.,Davies, H.(2001).Training the ideal hospital doctor: The specialist registrars' perspective.Medical Education,35,957-966.
14. Lin, C. H.,Tseng, S. M.(2005).The implementation gaps for the knowledge management system.Industrial Management and Data industry,105(2),208-222.
15. Lin, C. H.,Yeh, J. M.,Tseng, S. M.(2005).Case study of knowledge management.Journal of Knowledge Management,9(3),36-50.
16. Linberg, E.,Rosenqvist, U.(2003).The staff's views on what's the job the starting point for quality improvement in health care.International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance,16(1),47-54.
17. Mangin, M. M.(2007).Facilitating elementary principals' support for instructional teacher leadership.Educational Administration Quarterly,43(3),319-357.
18. Miles, M. B.,Huberman, A. M.(1994).Qualitative data analysis: An expanding sourcebook.London:Sage.
19. Ndlela, L. T.,Toit, A. S. A.(2001).Establishing a knowledge management programme for competitive advantage in an enterprise.International Journal of Information Management,21(2),151-165.
20. Nonaka, I.,Takeuchi, H.(1995).The knowledge creating company.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
21. Nonaka, L.(1991).The knowledge-creating company.Harvard Business Review,69(6),96-104.
22. Paiva, E. L.(2003).Integrating different types of knowledge: An empirical investigation.International Journal of Innovation and Learning,1(1),45-55.
23. Patton, M. Q.(1990).Qualitative evaluation and research methods.New bury Park, CA:Sage.
24. Patton, M. Q.(1987).How to use qualitative methods in evaluation.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
25. Petrides, L. A.,Guiney, S. Z.(2002).Knowledge management for school leaders: An ecological framework for thinking schools.Teachers College Record,104(8),1702-1717.
26. Knowledge management in education: Defining the landscape
27. Philip, H.,Kamontip, S.(2008).Educating leaders: Is there anything to learn from business management?.Educational Management Administration Leadership,36(1),9-31.
28. Rubenstein-Montano, B.,Liebowitz, J.,Buchwalter, J.,McCaw, D.,Newman, B.,Rebeck, K.(2001).A systems thinking framework for knowledge management.Decision Support Systems,31(1),5-16.
29. Sharkie, R.(2003).Knowledge creation and its place in the development of sustainable competitive advantage.Journal of Knowledge Management,7,20-31.
30. Stake, R. B.,N. K. Denzin (Eds.),Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.)(1998).Strategies of qualitative inquiry.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
31. Stevenson, J. M.(2001).The modem university provost.Education,121(2),347-349.
32. Suba, K. G.(1997).Pennsylvania,The Pennsylvania State University.
33. Tiwana, A.(2001).The knowledge management toolkit: Practical techniques for building knowledge management systems.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.

1. 陳建志、陳亭燏(2013)。校長教學視導、教師知識分享與教師專業發展之關係─運用中介效果模式驗證。當代教育研究季刊，21(2)，69-111。
2. 鐘巧如,陳建志(2014)。當代分布式領導在教育領導之發展與應用。教育研究與發展期刊，10(3)，1-24。
3. (2016)。國民小學組織內部行銷、知識管理與學校效能關係之研究。教育政策論壇，19(2)，93-124。