教育哲學研究歷史發展之國際比較

An International Comparison of the Historical Development of Educational Philosophy

10.3966/102887082011095703001

楊深坑(Seng-Keng Yang)

教育哲學史 ； 比較 ； 分析哲學 ； 觀念論 ； 理性主義 ； history of educational philosophy ； comparison ； analytical philosophy ； idealism ； rationalism

教育研究集刊

57:3期（2011 / 09 / 30）

1 - 35

繁體中文

本研究旨在運用N. Luhmann社會系統理論為方法論的概念工具，以比較分析英、美、德、法和澳洲五個國家教育哲學研究制度化的歷史過程，藉以彰顯教育哲學研究的共同特色及各國教育哲學發展之個殊文化特質。英國教育哲學的起源可追溯到1651年Wotton的《教育哲學探究》，其奠定了英國教育分析哲學之基礎，後經十九、二十世紀之交的觀念論籠罩，及至1970～1980年代則由分析哲學主導教育哲學發展。美國二十世紀初，觀念論的教育哲學和本土的Dewey實用主義互相激盪，到1970年代的分析哲學鼎盛。法國思想傳統素具人文主義與普遍主義特色，衍而為理性主義哲學傳統。德國虔敬派神學及神祕主義孕育了以「陶冶」為核心概念的教育哲學，後經Kant與Hegel及其學派樹立了具世界性影響力的觀念論哲學傳統。澳洲教育哲學由對英、美之依賴，走向試圖建立本土特色之教育哲學。1990年代以降，各國教育哲學大多呈現了現象學、詮釋學、批判理論、後現代主義、後結構主義等各種哲學思想互相爭衡、百花齊放的景象。

Adopting N. Luhmann's system theory as methodological tool, this paper attempts to compare the historical development of the studies in educational philosophy in the U.K., the U.S.A., Germany, France, and Australia. This aim is to explicate the universal nature of educational philosophy and the characteristic features of its study in each country. The origin of philosophy of education can be traced to Sir Henry Wotton's A Philosophical Survey of Educationpublished in 1651 which laid foundations of British analytical philosophy. German idealism founded mainly by Kant, Hegel, and their followers had exerted a world-wide influence on the development of educational philosophy during the turn of 19th to 20th century. In the U.S.A., the competitions between the imported idealism and native pragmatism in the early 20th century was followed by the domination of analytical philosophy from 1970s to 1980s. In Australia, many philosophers attempted to free themselves from the dependence on American and British philosophy and to establish their native philosophy of education. Since late 1990s, the world-wide philosophy of education has been characterized by a kaleidoscopic scene of competitions among phenomenology, hermeneutics, critical theory, and various ＂postisms.＂

1. Trapp, Chr. E. (1780). Versuch einer pädagogik : Von der nothwendigkeit, erziehen und unterrichten als eine eigne kunst zu studiren. Paderborn, Germany: Ferdinand Schöningh.
2. Dilthey, W. (1934). Gesammelte Schriften. Berlin, Germany: Leipzig.
3. Rosenkranz, J. K. Fr. (1899). Pädagogik als system (A. C. Brackett, Trans.). New York: D. Appleton and Company. (Original work published 1848)
4. Harris, W. T. (1894). Twentieth annual report to the board of directors of the Saint Louis public schools for the year ending. St. Louis, MO: Commissioner of Education.
5. 蕭恩承（1926）。教育哲學。上海市：商務印書館。[Xiao, E.-C. (1926). Philosophy of education. Shanghai, China: The Commercial. ]
6. Krieck, E. (1922). Philosophie der erziehung. Jena, Germany: Eugen Diederichs Verlag.
7. Stoy, K. V. (1878). Encyklopadie methodologie und literatur der padagogik. Leipzig, Germany: Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann.
8. Kermode, H. S. (1938). Intrdoctuction. In H. S. Kermode (Ed.), Reliquie wottoniane (pp. i-x). Liverpool, UK: University of Liverpool Press.
9. Harris, W. T. (1881). The church, the state, and the school. North American Review, 133, 215- 227.
10. Horne, H. H. (1932). The democratic philosophy of education. New York: Macmillan.
11. Bradley, F. H. (1893). Appearance and reality: A metaphysical essay (2nd ed.). London: S. Sonnenschien & Co.
12. Messer, A (1924). Philosophische grundlegung der pädagogik. Breslau, Poland:F. Hirt.
13. Moore, G. E. (1903b). Principia ethica Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
14. Horne, H. H. (1904). The philosophy of education: Being the foundation of education in the related natural and mental sciences. New York: Macmillan.
15. Moore, G. E. (1903a). The refutation of idealism. Mind, 12, 433-453.
16. Cohn, J. (1919). Geist der erziehung: Pädagogik auf philosophischer grundlage. Berlin, Germany: B. G. Teubner.
17. Vorländer, K. (1924). Immanuel Kant: Der mann und das werk. Leipzig, Germany: Verlag von Felix Meiner.
18. Harris, W. T. (1886). Introduction. In W. T. Harris (Ed.), A. C. Brackett (Trans.), The philosophy of education (pp. i-ixv). New York: D. Appleton & Company. (Original work published 1848)
19. Basedow, J. B. (1758). Practische philosophie für alle Stände: Ein weltbürgerlich buch ohne ansto für irgend eine nation, regierungsform und kirche. Berlin, Germany: Crusius.
20. Helvétius, C. A. (1772). De L'homme, de ses faculties intellectuelles et de son éducation. Londres, Germany: chez la Société Typographique.
21. Baily, R.(Ed.)(2010).The Sage handbook of philosophy of education.London:Sage.
22. Beck, C.(1991).North American, British and Australian philosophy of education from 1941 to 1991: Links, trends, prospects.Educational Theory,41(3),311-320.
23. Bellmann, J.(2004).Re-interpretation in historiography: John Dewey and the neo-humanist tradition.Studies in Philosophy and Education,23,467-488.
24. Blankertz, H.(1981).Die geschichte der pädagogik: Von der aufklärung bis zur gegenwart.Wetzlar, Germany:Buchse der Pandora.
25. Bollnow, O. F.(1959).Existenzphilosophie und pädagogik.Stuttgart, Germany:Kohlhammer.
26. Broudy, H. S.(1967).Philosophy of education: An organization of topics and selected sources.Urbana, IL:University of Illinois Press.
27. Broudy, H. S.(1955).How philosophyical can philosophy of education be?.Journal of Philosophy,52,612-622.
28. Carr, W.(2004).Philosophy and education.Journal of Philosophy of Education,38(1),55-73.
29. Chambliss, J. J.(1968).The origins of American philosophy of education: Its development as a distinct discipline, 1808-1913.The Hague, Netherlands:Martinus Nijhoff.
30. Derbolav, J.(1971).Systematische perspektiven der pädagogik.Heidelberg, Germany:Quelle & Meyer.
31. Farber, M.(Ed.)(1950).L'activité philosophique contemporaine en France et aux États-Unis.Paris:Presses Universitaires de France.
32. Guthmann. J.(1964).Űber die entwicklung des studiums der pädagogik.Frankfurt, Germany:Konkordia AG.
33. Haydon, G.(Ed.)(1998).50 years of philosophy of education: Progress and prospects.London:University of London.
34. Hofstetter, R.,Schneuwly, B.(2002).Educational science as a subject of historiography: a discipline in the area of tension between disciplinary, professional, and local/(inter) national fields.Zeitschrift für Pädagogik,56(5),678-702.
35. Kaminsky, J. S.(1986).The first 600 months of philosophy of education-1935-1985: A deconstructionist history.Education Philosophy and Theory,18(2),42-48.
36. Kaminsky, J. S.(1993).A new history of educational philosophy.Westport, CO:Greenwood Press.
37. Litt, T.(1968).Naturwissenschaft und Menschenbildung.Heidelberg, Germany:Quelle u. Meyer.
38. Luhmann, N.(2002).Das erziehungssystem der gesellschaft.Frankfurt, Germany:Suhrkamp.
39. Luhmann, N.(1990).Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft.Frankfurt, Germany:Suhrkamp.
40. Luhmann, N.,Schorr, K. E.(1979).Reflexionsproblem im erziehungssystem.Stuttgart, Germany:Klett.
41. McNaught, P. C.(1964).Towards philiophy of education.International Review of Education,10(3),257-264.
42. Muir, J. R.(1998).The history of educational ideas and the credibility of philosophy of education.Educational Philosophy and Theory,30(1),7-26.
43. Muir, J. R.(2004).Is there a history of educational philosophy? John White vs the historical evidence.Educational Philosophy and Theory,36(1),35-56.
44. Nicolin, F.(hrsg.)(1969).Pädagogik als wissenschaft.Darmstadt, Germany:Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaf.
45. Oancea, A.,Bridges, D.(2009).Philosophy of education in the UK:The historical and contemporary tradition.Oxford Review of Education,35(5),553-568.
46. Oelkers, J.(1989).Die grosse aspiration.Darmstadt, Germany:Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
47. O''Loughlin, M. A.(2002).Philosophy of education.Change: Transformations in education,5(1),78-89.
48. Soltis, J. S.(Ed.)(1981).Philosophy of education since mid-century.New York:Teachers College Press.
49. Spranger, E.(1950).Lebensformen.München, Germany:Siebenstern Taschenbuch Verlag.
50. Spranger, E.(1958).Der geborene erzieher.Heidelberg, Germany:Quelle & Meyer.
51. Tibble, J. W.(Ed.)(1966).The study of education.London:Routledge & Kegan Paul.
52. Vandenberg, D.(1966).Existential educating and pedagogic authority.Philosophy of Education,33,106-111.
53. Vandenberg, D.(1971).Being and education.Englewood, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
54. 黃昆輝編、楊深坑編(2009)。賈馥茗教育學體系研究。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:五南圖書=Wu Nan。
55. 黃建中主編(1959)。文教與哲學。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:臺灣省立師範大學教育研究所=Institute of Education, Provincial Taiwan Normal University。
56. 黃濟(1985)。教育哲學。北京市=Beijing, China:北京師範大學=Beijing Normal University。
57. 楊深坑(2002)。科學理論與教育學發展。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:心理=Psychology。
58. 楊深坑(1988)。理論、詮釋與實踐。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:師大書苑=Shia Ta Book。
59. 歐陽教主編(1971)。教育哲學。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:中等學校教師教育科目訓練班=Teacher Preservice Traning Program for High School。
60. 歐陽教(1973)。教育哲學導論。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:文景=Weng Jin。
61. 謝文全編、楊深坑編(1999)。教育科學的國際化與本土化。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:揚智文化=Yang Chih。

1. (2019)。比較教育的學術造型。中正教育研究，18(1)，1-27。
2. (2024)。從教育系統中英語教學的侷限性反思其可能性。學校行政，150，172-202。