臺灣教育行政學遺失的一塊：兩格論戰之意義及其在教育行政之啟示

The Missing Piece of Educational Administration in Taiwan: The Griffiths/Greenfield Debate and The Implications on Educational Administration

10.3966/102887082019096503004

蘇鈺楠(Yu-Nan Su)

兩格論戰 ； 教育行政典範 ； 教育行政哲學 ； 理論運動 ； the greenfield-griffiths debate ； paradigm of educational administration ； educational administration philosophy ； the theory movement

教育研究集刊

65:3期（2019 / 09 / 30）

91 - 105

繁體中文

理論運動與兩格論戰是教育行政學史上兩件重要大事，前者協助教育行政學成為嚴謹的學科，後者則催化教育行政學從量化典範轉為多元典範。在臺灣，關於兩者的研究與論述極為稀少，對照國內教育行政領域量化研究獨大的現象，衡酌如今全球教育行政之研究範圍愈趨複雜且多元，希望本文能有拋磚引玉之效，作為學界對話的開端。

The Theory Movement and The Greenfield-Griffiths Debat are two major events in educational administration field. The former one lift the field as an academic science and the latter one transform the paradigm in it from empirical to multiple. However, there are few papers and voice about both significant events. Comparing the complexes and multiple trend in educational administration field, empirical still play a monopoly role in Taiwan. Therefore, the main goal of this paper is to throw a sprat to catch a whale, hope to begin the conversation in educational administration field in Taiwan.

1. Baron, G.(Ed.),Cooper, D. H.(Ed.),Walker, W. G.(Ed.)(1969).Educational administration: International perspectives.Chicago, IL:Rand McNally.
2. Bernard, B.(1963).Modern behavioral sciences.New York, NY:Basic Books.
3. Campbell, R. F.(Ed.),Gregg, R. T.(Ed.)(1957).Administrative behavior in education.New York, NY:Harper Collins.
4. English, F. W.(1992).Educational administration: The human science.New York, NY:Harper Collins.
5. Evers, C. W.,Lakomski, G.(1991).Knowing educational administration: Contemporary methodological controversies in educational administration research.London, UK:Pergamon.
6. Feigl, H. (1949). Nuturalism and humanism. London, UK: D. Reidel.
7. Greenfield, T. B.(1978).Reflections on organization theory and the truths of irreconcilable realities.Educational Administration Quarterly,14(2),1-23.
8. Griffiths, D. E.(1983).Evolution in research and theory: A study of prominent researchers.Educational Administration Quarterly,19(3),201-211.
9. Griffiths, D. E.(1979).Intellectual turmoil in educational administration.Educational Administration Quarterly,15(3),43-65.
10. Griffiths, D. E.(1977).The individual in organization: A theoretical perspective.Educational Administration Quarterly,13(2),1-18.
11. Gronn, P. C.(1983).Rethinking educational administration: T. B. Greenfield and his critics.Waurn Ponds, VC:Deakin University Press.
12. Herda, E.(1978).Implications of a critical discussion in educational administration theory: The Griffiths/Greenfield debate examined from a philosophy of science perspective.Eugen, OR:University of Oregone.
13. Hoy, W. K.(1978).Science research in educational administration.Educational Administration Quarterly,14(3),1-12.
14. Immegart, G. L.(Ed.),Boyd, W. L.(Ed.)(1979).Problem-finding in educational administration: Trends in research and theory.Lexington, MA:D.C. Heath.
15. Murphy, J.(Ed.),Forsyth, P. B.(Ed.)(1999).Educational administration: A decade of reform.Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press.
16. Murphy, J.(Ed.),Forsyth, P. B.(Ed.)(1999).Educational administration: A decade of reform.Newbury Park, CA:Corwin Press.
17. Sackney, L. E.(1999).Handbook of research on educational administration.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
18. Simon, H.(1977).Model of discovery: And other topics in the methods of science.Dordrecht, Holland:D. Reidel.
19. 林志忠, J.-J.(2004).教育行政理論.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:心理=Psychological.
20. 秦夢群, J. M.,黃貞裕, C.-J.(2001).教育行政研究方法論.臺北市=Taiwan:五南=Wu-Nan Book.