重思學習障礙之定義與鑑定：一個特殊教育社會學的觀點

Reconsidering the Definition and Identification of Learning Disability: A Perspective of Sociology of Special Education

10.3966/102887082021096703001

楊巧玲(Chiao-Ling Yang)

特殊教育需求 ； 缺陷思維 ； 健全常規 ； 學習障礙 ； 鑑定安置 ； special education needs ； deficit thinking ； ableist normativity assumption ； learning disability ； identification and placement

教育研究集刊

67:3期（2021 / 09 / 30）

1 - 42

繁體中文

本研究延續批判教育學傳統，揭露教育理念與學校實務間的矛盾，聚焦於學習障礙類之定義與鑑定，採取社會學的觀點，檢視學習障礙如何是社會建構的產物。資料來源以訪談為主、文件檔案為輔。結果歸納三點發現：一、製造學習障礙：從無到有再到高出現率；二、灰色地帶：學習障礙與低成就難以切割；三、特殊教育需求：文化刺激不足不易排除。進而提出三點討論：一、教育相關體系生產特殊教育需求；二、特殊教育需求反映健全常規預設；三、健全常規預設強化缺陷思維。最後做成結論、提出反思：一、學習障礙乃一需求／供應鏈體系；二、「需求」與「缺陷」是一體兩面；三、反映健全常規預設以及對人口品質的焦慮。本研究呼籲重新省思學習障礙類別之定義與鑑定，以免背離實現教育機會均等、尊重多元文化差異之政策與願景。

Following the tradition of critical education, this study investigates the contradiction between educational ideals and school practices, focusing on the definition and identification of learning disability (LD) and examining how it is socially constructed. Using data from interviews and documents, this study found how LD is manufactured from non-existing, occurring, to being highly-visible, how LD is hard to tell solely from low achievement of students, and how LD is difficult to exempt from lacking of adequate cultural stimuli. Three points were then formulated for discussion. First, special education needs are produced from the entire educational system. Secondly, the assumption of ableist normativity is also required for special education. Finally, ableist normativity reinforces deficit thinking. This study concludes with three statements: 1. LD exhibits a system of demand and supply chain. 2. Needs and deficits are two sides of the same coin. 3. It mirrors the assumption of ableist normativity and an anxiety about population quality. It is important therefore to reconsider the definition and identification of LD for fear of contravening the policy and vision of equal education opportunity and cultural diversity.

1. 于承平, C.-P.(2016)。臺灣融合教育教師師資供需現況及問題探究。學校行政雙月刊，102，140-160。
   連結：
2. 吳瑋聰, W.-T.(2009)。應用差距標準與教學反應分析於學習障礙學童鑑定。國小特殊教育，48，32-40。
   連結：
3. 洪巧珣, C.-H.,林宏熾, H.-C.(2010)。國小階段身心障礙資源班教師多元文化教育素養及其相關因素之研究。特殊教育學報，31，53-84。
   連結：
4. 胡永崇, Y.-C.(2013)。從特殊教育的觀點檢討我國學習障礙的定義與鑑定標準。國小特殊教育，56，1-16。
   連結：
5. 張恆豪, H.-H.(2007)。特殊教育與障礙社會學：一個理論的反省。教育與社會研究，13，71-94。
   連結：
6. 張嘉文, C.-W.(2010)。台灣校長對特殊教育需求定義的觀點之社會學研究。特殊教育研究學刊，35(2)，1-27。
   連結：
7. 郭峰誠, F.-C.,張恆豪, H.-H.(2011)。保障還是限制？定額進用政策與視障者的就業困境。臺灣社會研究季刊，83，95-136。
   連結：
8. 陳淑麗, S.-L.,洪儷瑜, L.-Y.,曾世杰, S.-J.(2007)。轉介前介入在學障鑑定之可行性研究：以原住民低成就國小學童為例。特殊教育研究學刊，32(2)，47-66。
   連結：
9. 鄭麗雪, L.-H.(2010)。教學反應（RTI）—學習障礙鑑定的新趨勢。國小特殊教育，49，99-106。
   連結：
10. 教育部特殊教育通報網（無日期）。一般學校各縣市特教類別學生數統計（身障）。2020年10月1日，取自https://www.set.edu.tw/statistic_web/sta2/default.asp[Special Education Transmit Net, MOE. (n.d.). Statistics of student numbers with respect to special education categories by city/county. Retrieved October 1, 2020, from https://www.set.edu.tw/stastic_web/sta2/default.asp]
11. 立法院法律系統（無日期）。特殊教育法—立法沿革。2020年10月1日，取自https://lis.ly.gov.tw/lglawc/lawsingle?0^C48160C40C06E6C48160C0970606E49166C00E0626D0916EC40C[Legislative Yuan Law System. (n.d.). The Special Education Act—Legislative evolution. Retrieved October 1, 2020, from https://lis.ly.gov.tw/lglawc/lawsingle?0^C48160C40C06E6C48160C0970606E49166C00E0626D0916EC40C]
12. 新北市特教資訊網（2020）。鑑定安置—新北市學習障礙鑑定及亞型研判補充說明。取自https://www.sec.ntpc.edu.tw/Counseling/Details/395[Special Needs Education of New Taipei City. (2020). Identification and placement-Supplemental instruction of identifying LD and judging its subtypes. Retrieved from https://www.sec.ntpc.edu.tw/Counseling/Details/395]
13. 身心障礙及資賦優異學生鑑定辦法（2013）。取自https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=H0080065 [Regulations of Identifying Disabled and Gifted Students. (2013). Retrieved from https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=H0080065]
14. 教育部部史（無日期）。重大教育政策發展歷程。2021年1月4日，取自http://history.moe.gov.tw/policy.asp?id=7[History of MOE. (n.d.). The development process of crucial educational policies. Retrieved January 4, 2021, from http://history.moe.gov.tw/policy.asp?id=7]
15. Apple, M. W.(2004).Curriculum and ideology.New York, NY:RoutledgeFalmer.
16. Ayers, W.(Ed.),Quinn, T.(Ed.),Stovall, D.(Ed.)(2008).The handbook of social justice in education.New York, NY:Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Baker, B.(2002).The hunt for disability: The new eugenics and the normalization of school children.Teachers College Record,104(4),663-703.
18. Bazeley, P.(2021).Qualitative data analysis: Practical strategies.London, UK:Sage.
19. Berg, B.(2012).Qualitative research methods for the social sciences.Boston, MA:Allyn and Bacon.
20. Burman, E.(2008).Deconstructing developmental psychology.London, UK:Routledge.
21. Campbell, F.(2000).Eugenics in a different key? New technologies and the "conundrum" of "disability"."A race for a place": Eugenics, Darwinism and social thought and practice in Australia, Proceedings of the History and Sociology of Eugenics Conference,Callaghan, NSW:
22. Crabtree, B. F.(Ed.),Miller, W. L.(Ed.)(1999).Doing qualitative research.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
23. Danforth, S.,Rhodes, W.(1997).Deconstructing disability: A philosophy of inclusion.Remedial and Special Education,18(6),357-366.
24. Faubion, J. D.(Ed.)(2001).Power: The essential works of Foucault, 1954-1984.New York, NY:New Press.
25. Ferri, B. A.,Connor, D. J.(2005).Tools of exclusion: Race, disability, and (re)segregated education.Teachers College Record,107(3),453-474.
26. Foucault, M.(1977).Discipline and punish: The Birth of the prison.New York, NY:Pantheon Books.
27. Kidder-Ashley, P.,Deni, J.,Anderton, J.(2000).Learning disabilities eligibility in the 1990s: An analysis of state practices.Education,121(1),65-72.
28. Kirp, D. L.(1974).The great sorting machine.Phi Delta Kappan,55(8),521-525.
29. Oakes, J.(2005).Keeping track: How schools structure inequality.New Haven, CT:Yale University Press.
30. Ogbu, J.(1974).The next generation: An ethnography of education in an urban neighborhood.New York, NY:Academic Press.
31. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(2020).PISA 2018 results (Volume V): Effective policies, successful schools.Paris, France:OECD Publishing.
32. Petit-McClure, S. H.,Stinson, C.(2019).Disrupting dis/abilization: A critical exploration of research methods to combat white supremacy and ableism in education.Intersections: Critical Issues in Education,3(2),73-90.
33. Piaget, J.(1970).Science of education and the psychology of the child.New York, NY:Grossman.
34. Rainbow, P.(Ed.)(1984).The Foucault reader.New York, NY:Pantheon Books.
35. Skrtic, T.(1986).The crisis in special education knowledge: A perspective on perspective.Focus on Exceptional Children,18(7),1-16.
36. Slee, R.(2001).Driven to the margins: Disabled students, inclusive schooling and the politics of possibility.Cambridge Journal of Education,31(3),385-397.
37. Sleeter, C.(1986).Learning disabilities: The social construction of a special education category.Exceptional Children,53(1),46-54.
38. Spring, J.(1976).The sorting machine: National educational policy since 1945.New York, NY:David McKay.
39. Stiker, H.,Sayers, W.(Trans.)(1999).A history of disability.Ann Arbor, MI:University of Michigan Press.
40. Thorius, K.(2019).Facilitating en/counters with special education’s cloak of benevolence in professional learning to eliminate racial disproportionality in special education.International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education,32(3),323-340.
41. Tomlinson, S.(1981).Educational subnormality: A study in decision-making.London, UK:Routledge & Kegan Paul.
42. Valencia, R. R.(2010).Dismantling contemporary deficit thinking: Educational thought and practice.New York, NY:Routledge.
43. Valencia, R.(Ed.)(1997).The evolution of deficit thinking: Educational thought and practice.London, UK:Falmer.
44. Ware, L.(2000).Writing, identity, and the other: Dare we do disability studies?.Journal of Teacher Education,52(2),107-123.
45. 吳恭瑞, G.-R.(2010)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan，國立臺北教育大學=Taipei University of Education。
46. 宜蘭縣政府（2018）。宜蘭縣各國民中小學及學前身心障礙特殊教育班級與員額人力設置要點。取自http://glrslaw.e-land.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=GL000363[Yilan County Government. (2018). Regulation of special education class and staff for K-9 in Yilan. Retrieved from http://glrslaw.e-land.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=GL000363]
47. 林大森, T.-S.(2001)。家庭教育資源對教育分流、教育取得之影響。國立政治大學社會學報，31，45-75。
48. 林佩欣, P.-H.(2007)。從一個資源班教師的觀點來看普通學校實施融合教育的問題。特殊教育季刊，104，28-33。
49. 洪儷瑜, L.-Y.(2006)。學障教育在臺灣的第一個三十年—回顧與展望。特殊教育季刊，100，3-15。
50. 胡永崇, Y.-C.(2005)。以教學反應（RTI）作為學習障礙學童鑑定標準之探討。屏師特殊教育，11，1-9。
51. 高雄市政府（2014）。高雄市立高級中等以下學校及幼兒園身心障礙分散式資源班設置要點。取自https://www.kh.edu.tw/rules/getDirectory/126[Kaohsiung City Government. (2014). Regulations on setting the decentralized resource class for the disabled students from K to 12 in Kaohsiung. Retrieved from https://www.kh.edu.tw/rules/getDirectory/126]
52. 高雄市政府教育局, Kaohsiung City Government(2019)。高雄市政府教育局（2019）。高雄市108學年度國民教育階段學習障礙學生鑑定安置工作實施計畫。高雄市：作者。[Bureau of Education, Kaohsiung City Government. (2019). The plan for the identification and placement of students with LD in elementary and junior high schools, 2019 academic year. Kaohsiung, Taiwan: Author.]。
53. 國家教育研究院（編）=National Academy for Educational Research(Ed.)(2011).我國百年教育回顧與展望.新北市=New Taipei City, Taiwan:國家教育研究院=National Academy for Educational Research.
54. 國家教育研究院（無日期）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。2021年1月4日，取自https://www.naer.edu.tw/upload/1/16/doc/288/%E5%8D%81%E4%BA%8C%E5%B9%B4%E5%9C%8B%E6%95%99%E8%AA%B2%E7%A8%8B%E7%B6%B1%E8%A6%81%E7%B8%BD%E7%B6%B1.pdf [National Academy for Educational Research. (n.d.). Curriculum guidelines of 12-year basic education: General guidelines. Retrieved January 4, 2021, from https://www.naer.edu.tw/upload/1/16/doc/288/%E5%8D%81%E4%BA%8C%E5%B9%B4%E5%9C%8B%E6%95%99%E8%AA%B2%E7%A8%8B%E7%B6%B1%E8%A6%81%E7%B8%BD%E7%B6%B1.pdf]
55. 張芬芬, F.-F.(2010)。質性資料分析的五步驟：在抽象階梯上爬升。初等教育學刊，35，87-120。
56. 張春興, C.-H.(1974)。教育心理學的誕生與發展。師大學報，19，177-200。
57. 張嘉文, C.-W.(2009)。檢視台灣融合教育的研究與發展實務。網路社會學通訊，83
58. 張蓓莉, B.-L.(2009)。臺灣的融合教育。中等教育，60(4)，8-18。
59. 教育部（2015）。全球資訊網—即時新聞—持續協助，看見孩子的進步。取自https://www.edu.tw/news_Content.aspx?n=9E7AC85F1954DDA8&s=C37F8FA8128BA683[Ministry of Education. (2015). Global information net-Instant news-Keep helping to see children’s progress. Retrieved from https://www.edu.tw/news_Content.aspx?n=9E7AC85F1954DDA8&s=C37F8FA8128BA683]
60. 教育部（2020）。一○九年度特殊教育統計年報。取自https://www.set.edu.tw/actclass/fileshare/default.asp[Ministry of Education. (2020). Annual statistics of special education-Year 2010. Retrieved from https://www.set.edu.tw/actclass/fileshare/default.asp]
61. 教育部統計處（無日期）。教育統計查詢網—各級學校學生數—國小（各學年度總計公私立別、性別）。2020年10月1日，取自https://stats.moe.gov.tw/qframe.aspx?qno=MQA1AA2[Department of Statistics, MOE. (n.d.). Educational statistics data set-All student numbers-Elementary school. Retrieved October 1, 2020, from https://stats.moe.gov.tw/qframe.aspx?qno=MQA1AA2]
62. 許志成, Z.-C.(2007)。屏東市=Pingtung, Taiwan，國立屏東教育大學=National Pingtung University。
63. 黃柏華, P.-H.,梁怡萱, Y.-H.(2005)。轉介前介入於特殊教育中的角色探析。特殊教育季刊，95，1-11。
64. 楊巧玲, C.-L.(2020)。解構新移民子女教育研究中的缺陷思維論述。臺灣教育社會學研究，20(2)，39-90。
65. 溫國珍, K.-C.(2012)。不同教育安置環境下國小學習障礙學生學習態度與自我概念初探。東華特教，47，15-19。
66. 薛承泰, C.-T.(1996)。影響國初中後教育分流的實證分析：性別、省籍、與家庭背景的差異。台灣社會學刊，20，49-84。