操作型教師研習的網絡效果：行動者網絡理論視角

The Network Effect of In-service Teachers' Hands-on Workshop: A View from Actor-Network Theory

10.53106/102887082021126704002

陳斐卿(Fei-Ching Chen)

工作坊 ； 行動者網絡理論 ； 教師研習 ； 新課綱 ； hands-on workshop ； Actor-Network Theory ； teacher empowerment activities ； new curriculum guidelines

教育研究集刊

67:4期（2021 / 12 / 31）

39 - 79

繁體中文

在新課綱課程政策實施下，教師既有的課程設計能力與新課綱所需產生落差，教師增能活動也呈現變化—聆聽型的研習逐漸淡化，而動手做的研習大量湧現並受到教師普遍的認同。這種引入業界「操作型」活動的增能效果是如何發生的？本文以多點民族誌進行數十場次之研習觀察與訪談，以行動者網絡理論為視角，透過研習活動的數個關注點，分析「聽」、「懂」與「做」等五種聚合，這些聚合是由眾多人與物的異質行動體，如「講員」、「學員」、「現場語言」、「小組型桌椅」、「海報板」、「便利貼」、「零食」、「研習手冊」與「協作員」等相互連結而促成，透過這些聚合所拉開的網絡效果，最終展現在「海報板」的「研習知識」，其實歷經多重場域的多重存在。研究結果對於「物」在教師研習的角色、研習知識如何促成，乃至研習成效如何發生，提供新的洞見。

In Taiwan, teachers' curriculum design competence has been challenged since the implementation of the General Curriculum Guidelines of 12-Year Basic Education in 2019. Teachers' on-the-job training has also been organized differently from plenary speech to hands-on workshops. The effectiveness of the latter was well-received, but how did it happen? Ethnographic data was collected from observing 44 cross-school teacher community workshops, 40 interviews, and numerous postings in online social media. Drawing from the concept of ＂matter of concern＂ of Actor-Network Theory, the study identifies five assemblages: be willing to receive, be able to receive, be willing to understand, be able to understand, and practice. These assemblages were enacted by heterogeneous actors such as peer speakers, practical language, teachers, handouts, stickers, papers, posters, workshop schedules, arrangement of tables, snacks, social media platforms, and the facilitators. This study shows that the knowledge that the teachers performed at end of the hands-on workshop has become ＂matter of fact＂ through multiple hands-on workshop practice. This study will also discuss the role of objects, the enactment of hands-on performance, and the effectiveness of on-the-job training.

1. 林文源, W.-Y.(2018)。定位差異：以糖尿病衛教佈署為例。台灣社會學，36，47-110。
   連結：
2. 林怡君, Y.-J.,陳佩英, P.-Y.(2020)。一所高中的校訂必修發展歷程研究：行動者網絡理論取徑。中等教育，71(3)，17-29。
   連結：
3. 林政逸, J.-Y.(2019)。師資培育白皮書發布後師資職前培育和教師專業發展之省思。教育研究與發展期刊，15(1)，1-28。
   連結：
4. 張堯卿, Y.-C.,梁慧雯, H.-W.(2018)。以行動者網絡理論檢視高中教師跨學科領域課程設計之研究。科學教育學刊，26(S)，441-460。
   連結：
5. 莊德仁, D.-R.(2018)。高中歷史科素養導向課程設計工作坊紀實。中等教育，69，175-181。
   連結：
6. 陳斐卿, F.-F.(2021)。普通高中如何轉譯108課綱：政策促動觀點。課程與教學季刊，24(1)，149-173。
   連結：
7. 詹惠雪, H.-H.,黃曰鴻, Y.-H.(2020)。教師對素養導向課程設計的理解與實踐反思。課程與教學季刊，23(3)，29-58。
   連結：
8. 潘慧玲, H.-L.,許筠萱, Y.-H.(2019)。分散性領導在推動學習共同體中的實踐：以一所國中國文教師學習社群為案例。學校行政雙月刊，119，197-214。
   連結：
9. 藍偉瑩, W.-Y.(2018)。學校課程領導工作坊規劃與實踐。中等教育，69(1)，80-94。
   連結：
10. Bleakley, A.(2012).The proof is in the pudding: Putting actor-network-theory to work in medical education.Medical Teacher,34(6),462-467.
11. Coleman, S.(Ed.),Pauline, V. H.(Ed.)(2012).Multi-sited ethnography: Problems and possibilities in the translocation of research methods.New York, NY:Routledge.
12. Cress, U.(Ed.),Rosé, C.(Ed.),Wise, A. F.(Ed.),Oshima, J.(Ed.)(2021).International handbook of computer-supported collaborative learning.New York, NY:Springer.
13. Edmondson, A. C.(2016).Wicked problem solvers.Harvard Business Review,94(6),52-59.
14. Evans, J.,Jones, P.(2011).The walking interview: Methodology, mobility and place.Applied Geography,31(2),849-858.
15. Fenwick, T.(Ed.),Edwards, R.(Ed.)(2014).Reconceptualising professional learning: Sociomaterial knowledges, practices and responsibilities.New York, NY:Routledge.
16. Fenwick, T.,Edwards, R.,Sawchuk, P.(2011).Emerging approaches to educational research: Tracing the socio-material.Oxford, UK:Routledge.
17. Keay, J. K.,Carse, N.,Jess, M.(2019).Understanding teachers as complex professional learners.Professional Development in Education,45(1),125-137.
18. Koyama, J.(2015).When things come undone: The promise of dissembling education policy.Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education,36(4),548-559.
19. Labone, E.,Long, J.(2016).Features of effective professional learning: A case study of the implementation of a system-based professional learning model.Professional Development in Education,42(1),54-77.
20. Latour, B.(2005).Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor network-theory (Clarendon lectures in management studies).New York, NY:Oxford University Press.
21. Latour, B.(2004).Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern.Critical Inquiry,30(2),225-248.
22. Latour, B.(1987).Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
23. Law, J.(2004).After method: Mess in social science research.Oxford, UK:Routledge.
24. Law, J.(Ed.),Hassard, J.(Ed.)(1999).Actor network theory and after, sociological review monograph.Oxford, UK:Blackwell.
25. Lefstein, A.,Louie, N.,Segal, A.,Becher, A.(2020).Taking stock of research on teacher collaborative discourse: Theory and method in a nascent field.Teaching and Teacher Education,88,1-13.
26. Louie, N. L.(2016).Tensions in equity-and reform-oriented learning in teachers’ collaborative conversations.Teaching and Teacher Education,53,10-19.
27. Marcus, G. E.(1995).Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography.Annual Review of Anthropology,24,95-117.
28. Miettinen, R.(1999).The riddle of things: Activity theory and actor-network theory as approaches to studying innovations.Mind, Culture, and Activity,6(3),170-195.
29. Mitchell, B.(2020).Student-led improvement science projects: A praxiographic, actor-network theory study.Studies in Continuing Education,42(1),133-146.
30. Nxumalo, F(2012).Unsettling representational practices: Inhabiting relational becomings in early childhood education.Child & Youth Services,33(3-4),281-302.
31. Rubin, J. C.,Land, L. C.,Long, S. L.(2021).Mobilising new understandings: An actor-network analysis of learning and change in a self-directed professional development community.Professional Development in Education
32. Schaik, R.,Volman, M.,Admiraal, W.,Schenke, W.(2019).Approaches to co-construction of knowledge in teacher learning groups.Teaching and Teacher Education,84,30-43.
33. Sheridan, M. P.,Lemieux, A.,Nascimento, A. D.,Arnseth, H. C.(2020).Intra-active entanglements: What posthuman and new materialist frameworks can offer the learning sciences.British Journal of Educational Technology,51(4),1277-1291.
34. Shuilleabhain, A.,Seery, A.(2018).Enacting curriculum reform through lesson study: A case study of mathematics teacher learning.Professional Development in Education,44(2),1-15.
35. Simmie, G. M.,De Paor, C.,Liston, J.,O’Shea, J.(2017).Discursive positioning of beginning teachers’ professional learning during induction: A critical literature review from 2004 to 2014.Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education,45(5),505-519.
36. Sørensen, E.(2009).The materiality of learning: Technology and knowledge in educational practice.New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
37. Strauss、 A.,Cobin, J.,徐宗國（譯）, Z.-G.(Trans.)(2002).質性研究概論.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:巨流=Ju-Liu.
38. Vrikki, M.,Warwick, P.,Mercer, N.,Van Halem, N.(2017).Teacher learning in the context of lesson study: A video-based analysis of teacher discussions.Teaching and Teacher Education,61,211-224.
39. Zhang, Z.,Heydon, R.(2016).The changing landscape of literacy curriculum in a SinoCanada transnational education programme: An actor-network theory informed case study.Journal of Curriculum Studies,48(4),547-564.
40. 王金國, J.-G.(2015)。創造正向的教師研習經驗。臺灣教育評論月刊，4(10)，55-58。
41. 王郁雯, Y.-W.(2017)。核心素養的課程轉化探究：一位教保員的實踐。第37屆課程與教學論壇，臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:
42. 王韻齡, Y.-L.(2015)。新鮮事／邀偏鄉老師一同翻轉教育。親子天下，69
43. 余安邦, A.-B.,劉淑慧, S.-H.(2007)。文化、行動與教師專業：以「社區行動課程」與「社區有教室」為例。教育與文化論壇—教育的文化／文化的教育研討會，屏東市=Pingtung, Taiwan:
44. 李珮育, P.-Y.,楊玉珍, Y.-J.(2018)。國小中年級教師專業學習社群推動國語文課程共備模式之省思。臺灣教育評論月刊，7(4)，108-111。
45. 林麗芳, L.-F.,鄭亞盈, Y.-Y.(2016)。淺論「構築教師的同僚性」。臺灣教育評論月刊，5(5)，79-81。
46. 施又瑀, Y.-Y.,施喻琁, Y.-X.(2019)。務實的教師專業發展。臺灣教育評論月刊，8(2)，37-45。
47. 范信賢, S.-S.(2019)。領域素養導向課程及教學設計。課程協作與實踐，臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:
48. 張舒涵, S.-H.(2016)。桃園市=Taoyuan, Taiwan，國立中央大學=National Central University。
49. 張德銳, D.-R.(2015)。研習不等於教學實踐—關鍵五堂課的評論。臺灣教育評論月刊，4(4)，1-4。
50. 教育部（2013）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。臺北市：作者。[Ministry of Education. (2013). Curriculum guidelines of 12-year basic education-general guidelines. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.]
51. 曹博凱, P.-K.(2018)。桃園市=Taoyuan, Taiwan，國立中央大學=National Central University。
52. 陳佩君, P.-C.,陳淑美, S.-M.(2016)。改變的力量—教師參與自主性學習社群以提升教師專業。臺灣教育評論月刊，5(12)，55-57。
53. 陳佩英, P.-Y.(2017)。為維護公共利益而領導：高中優質化輔助方案之推動經驗。性別平等教育季刊，78，27-31。
54. 陳延興, Y.-H.(2019)。大手牽小手—教師專業社群的陪伴與支持。臺灣教育評論月刊，8(3)，41-46。
55. 陳怡心, Y.-S.(2018)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan，國立臺灣師範大學=National Taiwan Normal University。
56. 陳家琪, C.-C.(2021)。桃園市=Taoyuan, Taiwan，國立中央大學=National Central University。
57. 曾怡潓, Y.-H.(2019)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan，國立臺灣師範大學=National Taiwan Normal University。
58. 曾煥淦, H.-K.(2017)。偏鄉國小教師專業發展的困境與策進作為。臺灣教育評論月刊，6(12)，122-126。
59. 黃國峯, K.-F.,吳錦惠, J.-H.,吳俊憲, J.-S.(2019)。推動區域跨校共備教師社群的規劃與運作。臺灣教育評論月刊，8(8)，22-27。
60. 趙曉美, X.-M.(2018)。由九年一貫到十二年國教的課程改革與教師專業成長。臺灣教育評論月刊，7(10)，178-181。
61. 蔡孟耘, M.-Y.,陳棟梁, T.-L.,陳俐文, L.-W.(2020)。教師進修動機、教師專業成長與教學效能關係之研究—以「夢的N次方」為例。兩岸職業教育論叢，4(1)，45-57。
62. 蔡晏霖（編）, Y.-L.(Ed.),趙恩潔（編）, E.-C.(Ed.)(2019).反田野：人類學異托邦故事集.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:左岸文化=Rive Gauche.
63. 鍾昌宏, C.-H.(2019)。以教師專業發展縮小十二年國教新課綱課程轉化落差。臺灣教育評論月刊，8(8)，13-21。
64. 魏素鄉, S.-S.(2015)。記一堂「有效教學」的有效研習。臺灣教育評論月刊，4(4)，39-42。

1. 陳斐卿(Fei-Ching Chen)(2023)。從教師與出版業者之關係看十二年國民基本教育課程綱要下教師學習的轉變。教科書研究。16(1)。79-116。