H. Taba課程發展理論探究

Research on H. Taba's Curriculum Development Theory

10.53106/102887082022036801003

鍾鴻銘(Horng-Ming Jong)

泰勒原理 ； 塔巴 ； 塔巴模式 ； 課程史 ； 課程發展 ； Tyler rationale ； Taba ； Taba model ； curriculum history ； curriculum development

教育研究集刊

68:1期（2022 / 03 / 31）

75 - 113

繁體中文

本文旨在透過文獻分析探究Taba的課程發展理論。Taba本係留學生，因嚮往美國民主與進步主義教育理念，選擇留在美國發展。Taba以研究進步主義教育方法論起家，生涯發展卻與課程發展結下不解之緣。在實務工作與理論思索交互辯證影響下，Taba最終提出與泰勒原理（Tyler rationale）齊名的塔巴模式（Taba model）。塔巴模式認為課程發展需經歷需求診斷、形成目標、內容選擇、內容組織、學習經驗選擇、學習經驗組織，評鑑等程序。塔巴模式與科學化課程編製、泰勒原理皆認為課程發展是理性且科學化的過程，但其間仍有不同之處。解析其間的不同，亦可進一步瞭解塔巴課程發展理論的特性。

This article explores H. Taba's curriculum development theory through document analysis. Originally a foreign student in the United States, Taba chose to stay in the country because she yearned for American democracy and progressive education. Taba launched her academic career by studying the methodology of progressive education, but her career development was inextricably linked with curriculum development endeavor. Under the dialectical influence of practical work and theoretical thinking, she finally proposed the Taba model, which is as famous as Tyler rationale. In her model, Taba claimed that curriculum development process could be divided into seven steps: needs diagnosis, goals formation, content selection, content organization, learning experience selection, learning experience organization, evaluation. Taba model, scientific curriculum making, and Tyler rationale all assumed that curriculum development is a rational and scientific process, but there are still differences between them. Understanding these differences is helpful for understanding Taba's curriculum development theory.

1. 鍾鴻銘, H.-M.(2019)。W. W. Charters課程理論探究：兼論Charters與Bobbitt課程理論的異同。課程與教學季刊，22(3)，99-122。
   連結：
2. Bernard-Powers, J.(1999).Composing her life: Hilda Taba and social studies history.“Bending the future to their will”: Civic women, social education, and democracy,Lanham, MD:
3. Bernard-Powers, J.(2002).Hilda Taba.Building a legacy: Women in social education 1784-1984,Washington, DC:
4. Bhuttah, T. M.,Xiaoduan, C.,Ullah, H.,Bibi, A.(2018).Curriculum development: “An analysis of the Tyler and Taba model.North American Academic Research,1(7),109-118.
5. Bhuttah, T. M.,Xiaoduan, C.,Ullah, H.,Javed, S.(2019).Analysis of curriculum development stages from the perspective of Tyler, Taba and Wheeler.European Journal of Social Sciences,58(1),14-22.
6. Brady, E. H.(1996).Hilda Taba: The congruity of professing and doing.Teachers and mentors: Profiles of distinguished twentieth-century professors of education,New York, NY:
7. Bullough, R. V., Jr.,Kridel, C.(2003).Workshops, in-service teacher education, and the eight-year study.Teaching and Teacher Education,19,665-679.
8. Costa, A. L.,Loveall, R. A.(2002).The legacy of Hilda Taba.Journal of Curriculum and Supervision,18(1),56-62.
9. Fraenkel, J. R.(1992).Hilda Taba’s contributions to social studies education.Social Education,March,172-178.
10. Fraenkel, J. R.(1988).Remembering Hilda Taba.Teaching Education,2(1),82-86.
11. Fraenkel, J. R.(1994).The evolution of the Taba curriculum development project.Social Studies,85(4),149-159.
12. Hanninen, G. E.(1989).Moscow,University of Idaho.
13. Hayes, S.(1991).,未出版
14. Hunkins, F. P.,Hammill, P. A.(1994).Beyond Tyler and Taba: Reconceptualizing the curriculum process.Peabody Journal of Education,69(3),4-18.
15. Jackson, P. W.(Ed.)(1992).Handbook of research on curriculum: A project of the American Educational Research Association.New York, NY:Macmillan.
16. Kantes, M. H.(1976).New Brunswick,State University of New Jersey.
17. Kelting-Gibson, L.(2013).Analysis of 100 years of curriculum designs.International Journal of Instruction,6(1),39-58.
18. Kridel, C.,Newman, V.(2003).A random harvest: A multiplicity of studies in American curriculum history research.International handbook of curriculum research,Mahwah, NJ:
19. Krull, E.(2003).Hilda Taba (1902-1967).Prospect,33(4),481-491.
20. Läänemets, U.,Kalameers-Ruubel, K.(2013).The Taba-Tyler rationales.Journal of the American Association for the Advancement of Curriculum Studies,9,1-12.
21. Lunenburg, F. C.(2011).Curriculum development: Inductive models.Schooling,2(1),1-8.
22. Lybarger, M. B.(1991).The historiography of social studies: Retrospect, circumspect, and prospect.Handbook of research on social studies teaching and learning,New York, NY:
23. Marshall, J. D.,Sears, J. T.,Allen, L. A.,Roberts, P. A.,Schubert, W. H.(2007).Turning points in curriculum: A contemporary American memoir.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Pearson.
24. Middaugh, E.,Perlstein, D.(2005).Thinking and teaching in a democratic way: Hilda Taba and the ethos of Brown.Journal of Curriculum and Supervision,20(3),234-256.
25. Moseley, P. A.(1976).Hilda Taba, curriculum worker.Perspectives on curriculum development 1776-1976,Washington, DC:
26. Nowakowski, J. R.(2004).An interview with Ralph Tyler.Educating America: How Ralph W Tyler taught America to teach,Westport, CT:
27. Null, J. W.(2008).Curriculum development in historical perspective.The SAGE handbook of curriculum and instruction,Thousand Oaks, CA:
28. Ornstein, A. C.,Hunkins, F. P.(2009).Curriculum: Foundations, principles, and issues.Boston, MA:Allyn & Bacon.
29. Ozelis, T. F.(1992).DeKalb, IL.,Northern Illinois University.
30. Pinar, W. F.(1999).Introduction: A farewell and a celebration.Contemporary curriculum discourses: Twenty years of JCT,New York, NY:
31. Pinar, W. F.(2008).Curriculum theory since 1950: Crisis, reconceptualization, internalization.The SAGE handbook of curriculum and instruction,Thousand Oaks, CA:
32. Pinar, W. F.(2015).Educational experience as lived: Knowledge, history, alterity-the selected works of William F. Pinar.New York, NY:Routledge.
33. Pinar, W. F.,Reynolds, W. M.,Slattery, P.,Taubman, P. M.(1995).Understanding curriculum: An introduction to the study of historical and contemporary curriculum discourses.New York, NY:Peter Lang.
34. Popham, W. J.(1993).Educational evaluation.Boston, MA:Allyn & Bacon.
35. Schubert, W. H.(1986).Curriculum: Perspective, paradigm, and possibility.New York, NY:Macmillan.
36. Smith, S.(2013).Hilda Taba-curriculum pioneer and architect.Curriculum windows: What curriculum theorists of the 1960s can teach us about schools and society today,Charlotte, NC:
37. Stauffer, R. G.(Ed.)(1965).Language and the higher hought processes.Champaign, IL:NCTE.
38. Stern, B.(2010).Hilda Taba: Social studies reform from the bottom up.The new social studies: People, projects, and perspectives,Charlotte, NC:
39. Stern, B.(2011).Hilda Taba: A voice in the wilderness.Critical times in curriculum thought: People, politics, & perspectives,Charlotte, NC:
40. Taba, H. (1949b). Methods of studying moral beliefs. In R. J. Havighurst & H. Taba (Eds.), Adolescent character and personality (pp. 247-283). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
41. Taba, H.(2005).What is evaluation up to and up against in intergroup education?.Journal of Curriculum and Supervision,20(3),257-262.
42. Taba, H. (1945a). Curriculum problems. In H. Taba & W. Van Til (Eds.), Democratic human relations: Promising practices in intergroup and intercultural education in the social studies (pp. 21-62). Washington, DC: NCSS.
43. Taba, H. (1949a). Moral beliefs and the ability to apply them in solving problem of conduct. In R. J. Havighurst & H. Taba (Eds.), Adolescent character and personality (pp. 81-96). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
44. Taba, H. (1945c). General techniques of curriculum planning. In N. B. Henry (Ed.), American education in the postwar period, part1 curriculum reconstruction. The forty-forth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 80-115). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
45. Taba, H.(1962).Curriculum development: Theory and practice.New York, NY:Harcourt Brace and World.
46. Taba, H.(1957).Problem identification.Research for curriculum improvement,Washington, DC:
47. Taba, H. (1932). The dynamics of education: A methodology of progressive educational thought. London, UK: K. Paul Trench, Trubner.
48. Taba, H.(1963).Learning by discovery: Psychological and educational rationale.The Elementary School Journal,63(6),308-316.
49. Taba, H.(1953).An articulated social-studies curriculum in the elementary school.Social Education,17(8),369-372.
50. Taba, H. (1945b). Planning learning activities. In H. Taba & W. Van Til (Eds.), Democratic human relations: Promising practices in intergroup and intercultural education in the social studies (pp. 63-84). Washington, DC: NCSS.
51. Taba, H.(1999).The dynamics of education: A methodology of progressive educational thought.London, UK:Routledge.
52. Taba, H.(1967).Implementing thinking as an objective in social studies.Effective thinking in the social studies,Washington, DC:
53. Taba, H.,Brady, E. H.,Robinson, J. T.(1952).Intergroup education in public schools: Experimental programs sponsored by the project in intergroup education in cooperating schools: Theory, practice, and in-service education.Washington, DC:American Council on Education.
54. Taba, H.,Durkin, M. C.,Fraenkel, J. R.,McNaughton, A. H.(1971).A teacher’s handbook to elementary social studies: An inductive approach.Reading, MA:Addison-Wesley.
55. Taba, H., & Wilson, H. E. (1946). Intergroup education through the school curriculum. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 244, 19-25.
56. Tanner, D.,Tanner, L.(2007).Curriculum development: Theory into practice.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Pearson.
57. Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
58. Tyler, R. W.(1953).Leadership role of the school administrator in curriculum and instruction.The Elementary School Journal,54(4),200-209.
59. Watras, J.(2006).The eight-year study: From evaluative research to demonstration project, 1930-1940.Education Policy Analysis Archives,14(21),1-20.
60. Weldon, J. J.(1970).Carbondale, IL.,Southern Illinois University.
61. Witt, P. W. F.(Ed.)(1968).Technology and the curriculum.New York, NY:Teachers College Press.
62. Wraga, W. G.(2017).Understanding the Tyler rationale: Basic principles of curriculum and instruction in historical context.Espacio, Tiempo y Educación,4(2),227-252.
63. 陳伯璋（編）, P.-C.(Ed.)(2011).課程美學.臺北市=Taiwan:五南=Wu-Nan Book.
64. 黃光雄, G.-S.,蔡清田, C.-T.(2015).課程發展與設計新論.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:五南=Wu-Nan Book.
65. 黃政傑, Z.-J.(1991).課程設計.臺北市=Taiwan:東華=Tung Hua.
66. 甄曉蘭, H.-L.(2002).中小學課程改革與教學革新.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:高等教育=Higher Education.

1. (2023)。從教育社會學視角探察Hilda Taba社會科課程發展理論。臺灣教育社會學研究，23(1)，37-82。