大學跨域教育之學理基礎－從Nicolescu超／跨學科思想探析之

On the Rationale of Cross-domain Education in the University From the Perspective of Basarab Nicolescu's Thoughts on Transdisciplinarity

10.53106/102887082023036901001

林建福(Chien-Fu Lin)

Nicolescu ； 大學跨域／超（跨）學科教育 ； 超／跨學科 ； Basarab Nicolescu ； cross-domain or transdisciplinary education in university ； transdisciplinarity

教育研究集刊

69:1期（2023 / 03 / 31）

1 - 42

繁體中文;英文

現代大學主要是以學科知識為本而建立，難以協助學生形成統整的知識觀，或使其具有解決棘手問題所需要的能力，因此亟須探究超／跨學科思想並推廣超／跨學科教育。經由本研究發現，Nicolescu超／跨學科思想從存有論闡述超／跨學科的意義，承繼並運用Stéphane Lupasco含中邏輯的識見，在量子物理學的啟發下，提出了超／跨學科中「主體、客體、互動項」的三元劃分，並論述各個實在層級之間相互關聯與依賴的複雜性公理，同時，他也提出大學必須教導超／跨學科知識等相關大學超／跨學科教育的主張。本研究提出三點建議：一、超／跨學科的思潮與理念提醒我們檢視以學科為本之大學教育處境；二、必須闡明思想、理念史與學科的同構關係，特別是十七世紀機械論物理學或Descartes思想對當代大學所造成的影響；三、立基於Nicolescu途徑之類超／跨學科思想，審視大學跨域教育中所提供的跨域或超／跨學科課程。

Modern universities organized mainly on the basis of academic disciplines face significant challenges in fostering both learners' knowledge integration and their abilities to solve wicked problems. Carrying out Transdisciplinarity (TD) research and promoting TD education, therefore, are urgently needed. To bridge the gap, this study examines Basarab Nicolescu's TD thoughts and discusses their significance in TD education at universities. Three findings were revealed. Firstly, Nicolescu presents his unique TD thoughts from an ontological standpoint. Secondly, being inspired by quantum physics and Stéphane Lupasco's Logic of the Included Middle, Nicolescu proposes his ternary partition "Subject, Object, Interaction term/Hidden Third" and discusses TD complexity axiom of the interconnection and interdependence among levels of Reality. Thirdly, Nicolescu provides advices regarding TD education in the universities, including the inculcation of TD knowledge. This study ends with three suggestions: 1) the discipline-based education at modern universities should be reexamined; 2) a special light should be shed on the isomorphic relation among thought, the history of ideas and disciplines; and 3) in the light of Nicolescu's TD thoughts, the cross-domain or TD curricula offered at universities should be critically scrutinized.

1. Heisenberg, W.（2009）。物理學和哲學：現代科學中的革命（范岱年，譯）。商務印書館。（原著出版於1958）[Heisenberg, W. (2009). Physics and philosophy: The revolution in modern science (D.-N. Fan, Trans.). The Commercial Press. (Original work published 1958)]
2. 王秀槐、丁艾竹、蘇愛嵐（2011）。跨越科系的藩籬：我國研究型大學實施前段不分系模式分析與個案大學實施策略之探討。教育科學研究期刊，56（3），1-30。[Wang, H.-H., Ding, A.-C., & Su, A.-L. (2011). Crossing the border of disciplinary knowledge: An analysis of the choice of major at the upper level of college in research-oriented comprehensive universities, with the use of one case study based on student needs in Taiwan. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 56(3), 1-30.]
3. 陳竹亭、唐功培（2013）。跨科際教育在臺灣大專校院實施之探究。長庚人文社會學報，6（2），159-195。[Chen, J.-T., & Tang, K.-P. (2013). A study on the implementation of trans-disciplinary education at the university. Chang Gung Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(2), 159-195.]
4. Brenner, J. E. (2008). The logic of transdisciplinarity. In B. Nicolescu (Ed.), Transdisciplinarity: Theory and practice (pp. 155-165). Hampton Press.
5. Cole, A. (2007, November 22-24). Motueka Catchment futures, transdisciplinarity, a local sustainability problématique and the Achilles-heel of Western science [Paper presentation]. 5th Australasian Conference on Social and Environmental Accounting Research. Wellington, New Zealand.
6. de Freitas, L., Morin, E., & Nicolescu, B. (1994). The charter of transdisciplinarity. In K. C. Voss (Trans.), Manifesto of transdisciplinarity (pp. 147-152). State University of New York Press.
7. Descartes, R. (1954). Rules for the direction of the mind. In Philosophical Writings (E. Anscombe & P. T. Geach, Trans.). https://learning.hccs.edu/faculty/robert.tierney/phil1301-3/substantive-course-materials/unit-iii/descartes-rules-for-the-direction-of-the-mind/view
8. Dressel, P. L., & Marcus, D. (1982). On teaching and learning in college. Jossey-Bass.
9. Heisenberg, W. (1958). Physics and philosophy: The revolution in modern science. Harper.
10. Max-Neef, M. A. (2005). Foundations of transdisciplinarity. Ecological Economics, 53, 5-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleon.2005.01.014
11. McGregor, S. L. T. (2015). The Nicolescuian and Zurich approaches to transdisciplinarity. https://www.academia.edu/13049831/The_Nicolescuian_and_Zurich_Approaches_to_Transdisciplinarity
12. McGregor, S. L. T., & Volckmann, R. (2013). Transversity: Transdisciplinarity in higher education. In G. Hampson & M. RichTolsma (Eds.), Leading transformative higher education (pp. 58-81). Palacky University Press. https://www.consultmcgregor.com/documents/publications/McGregor_Volckmann_2013_Transversity_chapter.pdf
13. Menken, S., & Keestra, M. (2016). An introduction to interdisciplinarity research: Theory and practice. Amsterdam University Press.
14. Mokiy, V. S. (2019). International standard of transdisciplinary education and transdisciplinary competence. Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 22, 73-90. https://doi.org/10.28945/4480
15. Montuori, A. (2008). Foreword: Transdisciplinarity. In B. Nicolesc (Ed.), Transdisciplinarity: Theory and practice (pp. ix-1). Hampton Press.
16. Morin, E. (2006, July 17). Restricted complexity, general complexity (C. Gershenson, Trans.) [Paper presentation]. Colloquium “Intelligence de la complexit’e: ‘epist’ emologie et pragmatique”, Cerisy-La-Salle, France. https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/5762082/mod_resource/content/1/Morin%20%282006%29%20-%20Restricted%20x%20Genderal%20Complexity.pdf
17. Morin, E. (2008). The reform of thought, transdisciplinarity, and the reform of university. In B. Nicolesc (Ed.), Transdisciplinarity: Theory and practice (pp. 23-33). Hampton Press.
18. Nicolescu, B. (1997, November 12-14). The transdisciplinary evolution of the university condition for sustainable development [Paper presentation]. International Congress on Universities’ Responsibilities to Society, Bangkok, Thailand.
19. Nicolescu, B. (2002). Manifesto of transdisciplinarity (K.-C. Voss, Trans.). State University of New York Press.
20. Nicolescu, B. (2005a, June 4-8). Towards transdisciplinary education and learning [Paper presentation]. Science and religion: Global perspectives Metanexus Institute Conference, Philadelphia, PA. http://www.metanexus.net/archive/conference2005/pdf/nicolescu.pdf
21. Nicolescu, B. (2005b). Transdisciplinarity- Past, present and future. https://www.tercercongresomundialtransdisciplinariedad.mx/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Transdisciplinarity-past-present-and-future.pdf
22. Nicolescu, B. (2005c). Towards transdisciplinary education. The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa, 1(1), 5-15. https://doi.org/10.4102/td.vlil.300
23. Nicolescu, B. (2007). Transdisciplinarity as methodological framework for going beyond the science-religion debate. In B. Nicolescu & M. Stavinschi (Eds.), Transdisciplinarity in science and religion (pp. 35-60). Curtea Veche.
24. Nicolescu, B. (2008). In vitro and in vivo knowledge-Methodology of transdisciplinarity. In B. Nicolesc (Ed.), Transdisciplinarity: Theory and practice (pp. 1-23). Hampton Press.
25. Nicolescu, B. (2010, June 16-19). Disciplinary boundaries-What are they and how they can be transgressed? [Paper presentation]. International Symposium on Research Across Boundaries, Luxembourg.
26. Nicolescu, B., & Camus, M. (1997, April 30-May 2). Declaration and recommendations [Paper presentation]. International Congress on Which University for Tomorrow? Towards a Transdisciplinary Evolution of the University, Locarno, Switzerland.
27. Ortega y Gasset, J. (1951). The revolt of the masses. George Allen & Unwin.
28. Short Chronology of Transdisciplinarity. (2008). In B. Nicolescu (Ed.), Transdisciplinarity: Theory and practice (pp. 253-255). Hampton Press.
29. Snow, C. P. (1993). The two cultures. Cambridge University Press.
30. Southgate, C. (Ed.). (2005). God, humanity, and the cosmos (2nd ed.). T & T Clark.
31. Volckmann, R. (2007). Transdisciplinarity: Basarab Nicolescu talks with Russ Volckmann. Integral Review, 4, 73-90.
32. Voss, K.-C. (1998). The university as a space of possibility. Centre International de Recherches et Études Transdisciplinaires. https://ciret-transdisciplinarity.org/bulletin/b12c10.php
33. Whitehead, A. N. (1970). Science and the modern world. Taipei Rainbow Bridge Book.
34. Wilshire, B. W. (1990). The moral collapse of the university: Professionalism, purity and alienation. State University of New York Press.